Marxist socialist-feminists with the support of a UN protocol have a global agenda to control our worlds population out of 'said' environmental concern for a planet ark, this and are winning by means of generating fear, propaganda, intimidation, and a popular consensus that population control is socially achievable by imposing environmental taxes,  when in fact it's a means of ensuring socio-demographic enslavement and control, right down to our very last key-stroke. If population control were achievable by increasing electricity prices..(lowering living standards) wilfully inflicting poverty on a populace, then why is it that our more deprived and impoverished nations on earth are also our more reproductively prolific?

We behave like bacteria, and when faced with the threat of extinction, our biological urge switches on and goes into overdrive. Our baby boomers are a perfect example of this interesting phenomena scientists are only beginning to understand. ...observing how bacteria arrange one another into carefully selected and genetically desirable communities, this and even communicate with one another on a cellular level, not unlike how we do really. Hence our cellular phones!!'
*groan* Ok, bad joke..., but even bacteria and assorted other organisms we are believed to have spawned from by some exhibit some rather humanoid-like behaviours, like population control, murder, discrimination, communication.


It's believed by some we are super-organisms, resilient, invasive, humanoid-bacterial hybrids currently plaguing the earth.



We must be stopped!!! AT ALL COST!!!!

But have we ever stopped to wonder why we privileged are bewildered by starving diseased abdominally bloated stick-people breeding like rabbits in 3rd world countries, celebrating the birth of their 14th child irrespective of high infant mortality rates and obvious poverty?

What do bacteria do when threatened, or faced with the possibility of extinction/invasion?
They multiply rapidly, as a means of survival. ...go into a type of biological overdrive... it's believed some don't however, rather they commit suicide, practice cannibalism, certain strains anyway.

Now for the developed new world order...traditional values, sentiments, families and beliefs simply don't fit the UN vision for their 21st Century community prototype. Breeders will be penalised, this and taxed heavily for their biologically invasive and green-house-gas emitting spawn, while pro-euthanasia and abortion lobby's and activists normalise the lawful practice of subtle genocide.

With or without the imposition of soul and lifestyle destroying taxes or one child policies, you will obey those who dictate the terms of corpocracy, so breeders beware...and have your chequebooks ready to make a tax deductible donation to your already chosen federally funded UN approved GALP approved organisation in the event you have just that one child too many.


Welcome to Sustainable Population Australia Inc.

http://www.population.org.au/

http://www.lifenews.com/int1206.html

http://www.news.com.au/baby-tax-needed-to-save-planet-claims-expert/story-e6frfk...

I agree, population reduction, or at least sustainability is required here without a doubt, but I just don't think inflicting famine on already developing countries will solve the problem.

Especially considering the poorest of the poor are the more reproductive and needy for their woes.


Like adding fuel to the fire.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Sep 20^th, 2010 at 11:58am:


To be accepted as a true feminist you have to be unquestioningly anti-life?

Quote:


Try really hard not to be ridiculous, Soren.

Soren wrote on Sep 20^th, 2010 at 2:25pm:


This opens a can of worms.  It does seem rather odd to oppose the death penalty for convicted criminals, but to feel comfortable with the killing of unborn babies?

mellie wrote on Sep 20^th, 2010 at 10:53am:


Totally agree, I meant to say something like that in my blurb, but it slipped my mind.

Quote:


Exactly. I've made it quite clear on this forum that I'm pro death penalty and, for the most part, anti-abortion.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2010 at 9:38am:



Fine, sorry.

'rabid pro-life' is tin-eared combination (being mad/sick in favour of life?) and juxtaposed against supposeddly 'real' feminsm as its opposite is startling. I didn't take it to be a mere tin-eared mixed metaphor but as the expression of a stance.