Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8
Send Topic Print
Still borrowing $100 million per day? (Read 16795 times)
#
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #60 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 9:21pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 7:56pm:
Please delete wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 3:01pm:
Bobby, you've raised this a hundred times, don't pretend you're not doing it to make a point.

Use your own brain - of course we are not borrowing $36.5B per annum. It's ridiculous, especially when you recall that at one stage they (and you) were saying that it was just the interest component.

And the attempt to say that Gillard agreed, because she didn't disagree is just poor debating.

So here's my challenge - You prove it's true, that it's not propaganda.



Ernie - I can't prove it.
It was a major election issue & now we hear nothing about it.

I asked someone who should have known. They told me that the figure originated with Barnaby Joyce. I haven't been able to confirm that. If true, it might indicate why nobody's taking it seriously.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
qikvtec
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1846
Queensland
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #61 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 9:37pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 7:56pm:
Please delete wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 3:01pm:
Bobby, you've raised this a hundred times, don't pretend you're not doing it to make a point.

Use your own brain - of course we are not borrowing $36.5B per annum. It's ridiculous, especially when you recall that at one stage they (and you) were saying that it was just the interest component.

And the attempt to say that Gillard agreed, because she didn't disagree is just poor debating.

So here's my challenge - You prove it's true, that it's not propaganda.



Ernie - I can't prove it.
It was a major election issue & now we hear nothing about it.


http://www.treasury.gov.au/documents/1858/HTML/docshell.asp?URL=02_Appendix_A.htm

Reasonable to expect we could find the numbers here?

Any clues Mr Hicks?
Back to top
 

Politicians and Nappies need to be changed often and for the same reason.

One trouble with political jokes is that they often get elected.

Alan Joyce for PM
 
IP Logged
 
qikvtec
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1846
Queensland
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #62 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 9:40pm
 
# wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 9:21pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 7:56pm:
Please delete wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 3:01pm:
Bobby, you've raised this a hundred times, don't pretend you're not doing it to make a point.

Use your own brain - of course we are not borrowing $36.5B per annum. It's ridiculous, especially when you recall that at one stage they (and you) were saying that it was just the interest component.

And the attempt to say that Gillard agreed, because she didn't disagree is just poor debating.

So here's my challenge - You prove it's true, that it's not propaganda.



Ernie - I can't prove it.
It was a major election issue & now we hear nothing about it.

I asked someone who should have known. They told me that the figure originated with Barnaby Joyce. I haven't been able to confirm that. If true, it might indicate why nobody's taking it seriously.


Not even Barnaby's own constituents understand why they continue to vote for him.  Certifiably insane. 
Back to top
 

Politicians and Nappies need to be changed often and for the same reason.

One trouble with political jokes is that they often get elected.

Alan Joyce for PM
 
IP Logged
 
deepthought
Gold Member
*****
Offline


In Defence Of Liberty

Posts: 2869
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #63 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 9:52pm
 
qikvtec wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 9:40pm:
# wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 9:21pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 7:56pm:
Please delete wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 3:01pm:
Bobby, you've raised this a hundred times, don't pretend you're not doing it to make a point.

Use your own brain - of course we are not borrowing $36.5B per annum. It's ridiculous, especially when you recall that at one stage they (and you) were saying that it was just the interest component.

And the attempt to say that Gillard agreed, because she didn't disagree is just poor debating.

So here's my challenge - You prove it's true, that it's not propaganda.



Ernie - I can't prove it.
It was a major election issue & now we hear nothing about it.

I asked someone who should have known. They told me that the figure originated with Barnaby Joyce. I haven't been able to confirm that. If true, it might indicate why nobody's taking it seriously.


Not even Barnaby's own constituents understand why they continue to vote for him.  Certifiably insane.  



The Bat and Barnaby are not wrong in saying the Treasurer refuses to deny the claim

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/07/26/2964184.htm
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 115367
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #64 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 10:26pm
 
Thanks Deepthought.

Link:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/07/26/2964184.htm

Quote:
"The correct figure is that our net debt, our net position - which is the way this has always been measured - is 6 per cent of GDP," Mr Swan said.


As a simple way to calculate with certain assumptions:

6% of  GDP  say $1.3 trillion -  is $78 billion.
If the interest is say-  5% -  then the annual interest is $3.9 billion.
The interest per day is $3.9 billion divided by 365 days = 10.7 million per day.

It's an order of magnitude smaller than what Abbott was saying.

Was Abbott a liar during the election?
The $100 million per day appeared in Liberal party adverts.

Was Abbott talking about the interest on the debt or
new borrowings?

Now I'm confused.





Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Binary Ninja
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 460
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #65 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 10:33pm
 
he is a liar .. nothing to e confused about .. he lied about costings , he lied about supporting regional australia , he lied to the Indi's about supporting the NBN..
why would you believe him when he uses numbers like 100 million per day ..
Back to top
 

Suck it up Princess's Labor are in
WWW  
IP Logged
 
qikvtec
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1846
Queensland
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #66 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 10:35pm
 
Binary Ninja wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 10:33pm:
he is a liar .. nothing to e confused about .. he lied about costings , he lied about supporting regional australia , he lied to the Indi's about supporting the NBN..
why would you believe him when he uses numbers like 100 million per day ..


Excuse me if I don't accept you as a bellwether for objectivity.  I'm interested to understand their measure, let me know if you find it.
Back to top
 

Politicians and Nappies need to be changed often and for the same reason.

One trouble with political jokes is that they often get elected.

Alan Joyce for PM
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #67 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 10:35pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2010 at 4:02pm:
Perceptions
Quote:
Possibly, because the Libs have agreed they would have borrowed at least 80% of what Labor did!


You are all missing the point.

Why can't we live within our means?


Let me say first, that compared to many, in fact, most other countries around the world, we are certainly much better off and yes, we are currently living well within our means.

Second, the figures seem to fluctuate a little, perhaps due to Political leanings. The $100 million you refer to was originally just the interest component of new borrowings, which in effect is the current deficit, now it seems to have slipped to new borrowings, not just interest.

That said, I would say you may be a little low, I think you may find out when the figures are announced later in the year, that the 2009-2010 deficit will be closer to $70 Billion or around $200 million a day.

That is certainly higher than the Liberals did during their last term during 1996-2007, but that was assisted by a massive Economic Boom, driven by the Peak Earning & Spending period for the Boomer generation.

The period between 2007-2010 was marked by the GFC, which was the beginning of the Boomer Bust, also assisted by the Peaking of Global Energy supplies (Peal Oil).

Notwithstanding all of that, if the deifict comes in at $70 Billion, that would be around 6% of GDP. To compare, the USA is looking at a deficit of over $1.5 Trillion on a GDP of about $13-14 Trillion, so their deficit would be about 11%.

Similarly, Australia's National Debt is likely to be around $180-$200 Billion, which is about 17% on our current GDP, whereas the USA has probably just exceeded 100% on their National Debt to GDP ratio.  

Bear in mind, the USA is not the worst & their are many in a similar category to them, so yes, we are relatively living within our means, particularly given the relevant circumstances, of when the Libs were in power, compared to the last 3 years.

And, if this were a standard recession, of the type experienced quite often last century, then I would also have no problem with continuing with deficits for the next 2-3 years.

However, this is not your run-of-the-mill recession, in that it will not simply go away, with the input of some money, to boost public confidence.

What we are now entering is a long term, Economic slowdown, where Demand is set to decline of many years, for a number of reasons.

That said, we need to back away from deficits, as quickly as possible, but at the same time we need to try to maintain the publics disposable income, as much as possible.

Politicians & Economists, will need to think outside their normal comfort zones, for a change!  
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 115367
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #68 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 10:41pm
 
Perceptions:
Quote:
That said, I would say you may be a little low, I think you may find out when the figures are announced later in the year, that the 2009-2010 deficit will be closer to $70 Billion or around $200 million a day.


$70 billion would give less than 10 million per day in interest not $200 million.

Look at my previous calculations.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Binary Ninja
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 460
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #69 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 10:47pm
 
Their is serious talks in financial circles  about the US going into a depression alongside Europe and Japan .. the coalition supporters whine about labors economic management but as pointed out was worse under Howard ..

They whine we spent the money we did on a stimulus but this has proved to be correct and kept us out of a recession ..  The countries who are struggling and heading into a depression have far worse economic figures.. Just remember Howard saw this coming and did nothing ... that is good management

So really it isn't about labor fiscal policy it is about how much the coalition supporters whinge because they lost the election ...
Back to top
 

Suck it up Princess's Labor are in
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 115367
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #70 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 10:51pm
 
Binary Ninja wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 10:47pm:
Their is serious talks in financial circles  about the US going into a depression alongside Europe and Japan .. the coalition supporters whine about labors economic management but as pointed out was worse under Howard ..

They whine we spent the money we did on a stimulus but this has proved to be correct and kept us out of a recession ..  The countries who are struggling and heading into a depression have far worse economic figures.. Just remember Howard saw this coming and did nothing ... that is good management

So really it isn't about labor fiscal policy it is about how much the coalition supporters whinge because they lost the election ...  


Stop hijacking my thread.
Just answer the question.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Binary Ninja
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 460
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #71 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 10:59pm
 
calm down take a chill pill .. no one is hijacking i am just making a valid point .. all the while you whine about our debt level it is very small compared to any major country in the world ....We are very healthy economy wise and as pointed out out of a recession , and not headed for a depression like the possibility for others ..

That is a better scenario then the amount of debt we have to repay just like any other country has a debt
Back to top
 

Suck it up Princess's Labor are in
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 115367
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #72 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 11:04pm
 
Binary Ninja wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 10:59pm:
calm down take a chill pill .. no one is hijacking i am just making a valid point .. all the while you whine about our debt level it is very small compared to any major country in the world ....We are very healthy economy wise and as pointed out out of a recession , and not headed for a depression like the possibility for others ..

That is a better scenario then the amount of debt we have to repay just like any other country has a debt


Stop your Ruddite behaviour.
You ask Rudd a question & he says -
well that's not really the question -
this is the question - blah blah blah.
Get off my thread with your nonsense.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #73 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 11:10pm
 
perceptions_now wrote on Sep 14th, 2010 at 10:35pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2010 at 4:02pm:
Perceptions
Quote:
Possibly, because the Libs have agreed they would have borrowed at least 80% of what Labor did!


You are all missing the point.

Why can't we live within our means?


Let me say first, that compared to many, in fact, most other countries around the world, we are certainly much better off and yes, we are currently living well within our means.

Second, the figures seem to fluctuate a little, perhaps due to Political leanings. The $100 million you refer to was originally just the interest component of new borrowings, which in effect is the current deficit, now it seems to have slipped to new borrowings, not just interest.

That said, I would say you may be a little low, I think you may find out when the figures are announced later in the year, that the 2009-2010 deficit will be closer to $70 Billion or around $200 million a day.

That is certainly higher than the Liberals did during their last term during 1996-2007, but that was assisted by a massive Economic Boom, driven by the Peak Earning & Spending period for the Boomer generation.

The period between 2007-2010 was marked by the GFC, which was the beginning of the Boomer Bust, also assisted by the Peaking of Global Energy supplies (Peal Oil).

Notwithstanding all of that, if the deifict comes in at $70 Billion, that would be around 6% of GDP. To compare, the USA is looking at a deficit of over $1.5 Trillion on a GDP of about $13-14 Trillion, so their deficit would be about 11%.

Similarly, Australia's National Debt is likely to be around $180-$200 Billion, which is about 17% on our current GDP, whereas the USA has probably just exceeded 100% on their National Debt to GDP ratio.  

Bear in mind, the USA is not the worst & their are many in a similar category to them, so yes, we are relatively living within our means, particularly given the relevant circumstances, of when the Libs were in power, compared to the last 3 years.

And, if this were a standard recession, of the type experienced quite often last century, then I would also have no problem with continuing with deficits for the next 2-3 years.

However, this is not your run-of-the-mill recession, in that it will not simply go away, with the input of some money, to boost public confidence.

What we are now entering is a long term, Economic slowdown, where Demand is set to decline of many years, for a number of reasons.

That said, we need to back away from deficits, as quickly as possible, but at the same time we need to try to maintain the publics disposable income, as much as possible.

Politicians & Economists, will need to think outside their normal comfort zones, for a change!  


That is an excellent analysis by perceptions, and the final point about how we proceed is a very valid one, although the sad fact is that if the recession continues as is expected, then we also know what will follow, as night follows day, it has always been, and that is one of the scariest scenarios there is.
In that situation (war for those slow on the uptake), it is hard to say how our comparative financial status will be of much benefit anyway, so I think we really need to concentrate on raising the profile of our banking system and chocolate industries, and be careful who we are friends with.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 115367
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Still borrowing $100 million per day?
Reply #74 - Sep 14th, 2010 at 11:19pm
 
Mozzaok,
I already debunked Perceptions.

Perceptions:
Quote:
That said, I would say you may be a little low, I think you may find out when the figures are announced later in the year, that the 2009-2010 deficit will be closer to $70 Billion or around $200 million a day.


$70 billion would give less than 10 million per day in interest not $200 million.

Look at my previous calculations.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8
Send Topic Print