muso wrote on Sep 2
nd, 2010 at 3:51pm:
mellie wrote on Sep 2
nd, 2010 at 1:18pm:
Please outline your reasons for preferring one way or the other.
You don't have a viable option for my preference.
My preference is for a federation , similar to the Swiss Federation, as opposed to a Republic. A monarchy is anachronistic and we have the situation where foreign heads of state pay their respects to our head of state - The Queen, or even worse, King Charles and Queen Camilla.
My option is not to change the system much. We don't need an actual president. We have enough layers of government as it is. All we need is a presiding council with a representative from each state with powers similar to the current GG.
On the subject of the flag, perhaps it's an opportunity to transition to a new flag that reflects the joint values of a Federation.
Perhaps we could retain the Southern Cross, but superimpose the combined floral emblems of each of the States. It's a suggestion. Maybe we should have a competition.
Boxing kangaroos are crass.
Muso, the reason I didn't provide you with this option, is because neither of our leading party's have.
As far as Labor are concerned, it's their way or no way.
They want their republic, this and made it a covert election issue when they sprung this on us just days before an election.
Much like their covert censorship issue, they don't feel at liberty to discuss either, despite Gillard herself advising reporters that censorship would be an election issue back in 2008 when they enquired about the mandatory filter then.
Another 'non-discussion' is the islamification of our country, and Labor immigrating those who they know will vote in favour of their political objectives.
Muslim immigration should have been an election also, though it wasn't.
We need to start talking about these issues, PC or not.