Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 18
Send Topic Print
Same-sex adoption (Read 31679 times)
mellie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8142
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #30 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:29pm
 
... wrote on Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:23pm:
Verge wrote on Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:20pm:
Reality is its not hard for a woman to get access to IVF in order for the lesbian couple to have a child.  

There is also cases where the mum and the dad have the kids, down the track dad decides he like Dave more than Mary, moves out, but still retains his parental rights.

Reality is outside of the bedroom, they are exactly the same as the rest of us.

I would rather a child brought up in a loving, stable, financially secure gay home, than other alternatives.




But what would the CHILD rather?

You also seem to be suffering from the misconception that gays are not subject to the saem failings that everyone else is.



Ok, these situations occur, re- gay-IVF woman and Dad preferring Dave later on down the track, but passing bills to legalise gay-adoption is just typical of Labors poll driven policy/social engineering.

Where they get to play 'god' for a term.

Roll Eyes ....Just because it's legal, doesn't mean it's right.

All kids deserve the right to both a male and female parenting figure, if this fails, then sure, improvise, but I think it's a biological right of all, ...likewise, I'm opposed to single straight woman receiving IVF.

Again, the child is being denied the opportunity of both a maternal and paternal figure in their lives.
Back to top
 

All together now Labor voters.......&&&&lap-tops, pink-bats refugees and Clunker-cars&&&&insurance.AES256
 
IP Logged
 
Life_goes_on
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4772
400kms south of Yobsville, Qld
Gender: male
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #31 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:30pm
 
Quote:
But what would the CHILD rather?


A loving, stable, financially secure home?

A friend of mine grew up with two "mums" and she's just fine about it. She's simply never seen an issue with it.
Back to top
 

"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013

Num num num num.
 
IP Logged
 
Verge
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6329
Gender: male
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #32 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:32pm
 
... wrote on Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:23pm:
Verge wrote on Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:20pm:
Reality is its not hard for a woman to get access to IVF in order for the lesbian couple to have a child.  

There is also cases where the mum and the dad have the kids, down the track dad decides he like Dave more than Mary, moves out, but still retains his parental rights.

Reality is outside of the bedroom, they are exactly the same as the rest of us.

I would rather a child brought up in a loving, stable, financially secure gay home, than other alternatives.




But what would the CHILD rather?

You also seem to be suffering from the misconception that gays are not subject to the saem failings that everyone else is.


I think a kid would want to grow up in a loving stable home.

Of course they are subject to the same failings as everyone else, so why should adoption be only for hetro couples.  Why dont they just have to accept they can have kids and move on?
Back to top
 

And why not, if you will permit me; why shouldn’t I, if you will permit me; spend my first week as prime minister, should that happen, on this, on your, country - Abbott with the Garma People Aug 13
 
IP Logged
 
aikmann4
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2093
canberra
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #33 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:32pm
 
Isn't the number of children waiting to be adopted much smaller than the queues of people who desire to adopt? If so, how is this an issue?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #34 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:33pm
 

Quote:
She's simply never seen an issue with it.




She's in for a shock when she finally finds out how babies are made then.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
Life_goes_on
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4772
400kms south of Yobsville, Qld
Gender: male
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #35 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:35pm
 
Quote:
You also seem to be suffering from the misconception that gays are not subject to the saem failings that everyone else is.


They're subject to the same failings, same aspirations, same emotions.
Back to top
 

"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013

Num num num num.
 
IP Logged
 
Verge
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6329
Gender: male
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #36 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:38pm
 
I find it amusing people who are against it keep saying it goes against nature.

Doesnt adoption full stop go against nature, giving couples who cant have kids getting to have them?
Back to top
 

And why not, if you will permit me; why shouldn’t I, if you will permit me; spend my first week as prime minister, should that happen, on this, on your, country - Abbott with the Garma People Aug 13
 
IP Logged
 
aikmann4
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2093
canberra
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #37 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:43pm
 
Statistical analysis of children adopted by gay parents is required before we jump right into the widespread acceptance and institutionalization of homo adoption. If it can be determined that being raised in the household of a functional, normal gay couple is more likely than not a cause of the development of social pathologies amongst their children, then we have a fairly good reason to restrict the right of gay parents from adopting.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:48pm by aikmann4 »  
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #38 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:44pm
 
mellie wrote on Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:29pm:
... wrote on Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:23pm:
Verge wrote on Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:20pm:
Reality is its not hard for a woman to get access to IVF in order for the lesbian couple to have a child.  

There is also cases where the mum and the dad have the kids, down the track dad decides he like Dave more than Mary, moves out, but still retains his parental rights.

Reality is outside of the bedroom, they are exactly the same as the rest of us.

I would rather a child brought up in a loving, stable, financially secure gay home, than other alternatives.




But what would the CHILD rather?

You also seem to be suffering from the misconception that gays are not subject to the saem failings that everyone else is.



Ok, these situations occur, re- gay-IVF woman and Dad preferring Dave later on down the track, but passing bills to legalise gay-adoption is just typical of Labors poll driven policy/social engineering.

Where they get to play 'god' for a term.

Roll Eyes ....Just because it's legal, doesn't mean it's right.

All kids deserve the right to both a male and female parenting figure, if this fails, then sure, improvise, but I think it's a biological right of all, ...likewise, I'm opposed to single straight woman receiving IVF.

Again, the child is being denied the opportunity of both a maternal and paternal figure in their lives.



No mellie....
All children 'deserve the right' to be raised by a person or people who loves and cares for them....

Unless you feel that single parent families (single mother OR single father) should be made illegal too..
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #39 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:47pm
 
Verge wrote on Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:38pm:
I find it amusing people who are against it keep saying it goes against nature.

Doesnt adoption full stop go against nature, giving couples who cant have kids getting to have them?



For that matter 1 male+1 female coupling goes against nature...
The 'norm' in nature is 1 male+5 female....

AND usually the 'new' male kills and/or eats  the offspring of the previous male....
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #40 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:48pm
 
mellie wrote on Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:29pm:
Ok, these situations occur, re- gay-IVF woman and Dad preferring Dave later on down the track, but passing bills to legalise gay-adoption is just typical of Labors poll driven policy/social engineering.

Where they get to play 'god' for a term.

Roll Eyes ....Just because it's legal, doesn't mean it's right.

All kids deserve the right to both a male and female parenting figure, if this fails, then sure, improvise, but I think it's a biological right of all, ...likewise, I'm opposed to single straight woman receiving IVF.

Again, the child is being denied the opportunity of both a maternal and paternal figure in their lives.


Why don't you think about what you're saying Mel?  Approximately one third of our kids grow up in households with only one parent - and that's an overstatement.

Single parents are stressed and anxious a lot of the time. They can't give their children the quality time they demand. Two parents of either sex are better than just one as long as the child/children are wanted and loved.

You have a son at high school Mel. You must have some awareness that many of his classmates are bi-sexual or gay.  People have to choose their own partners and there is no logical reason why they shouldn't have the same rights as anyone else.




 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Verge
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6329
Gender: male
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #41 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:48pm
 
aikmann4 wrote on Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:43pm:
Statistical analysis of children adopted by gay parents is required before we jump right into its widespread acceptance and institutionalization. If it can be determined that being raised in the household of a functional, normal gay couple is more likely than not a cause of the development of social pathologies amongst their children, then we have a fairly good reason to restrict the right of gay parents from adopting.


I havent seen the stats, but it would be interesting to see the ones out of the US.
Back to top
 

And why not, if you will permit me; why shouldn’t I, if you will permit me; spend my first week as prime minister, should that happen, on this, on your, country - Abbott with the Garma People Aug 13
 
IP Logged
 
aikmann4
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 2093
canberra
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #42 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:51pm
 
I haven't either. I don't think any exist yet, which is why we need studies. Progressives are always willing to dive headfirst into any notion with no looking back without cautiously asking amongst themselves whether it will be a good idea, and applying statistical tools to inform their final decision on the matter. Look at multiculturalism, multiracialism, civil rights, etc. to see that this observation holds true.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Life_goes_on
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4772
400kms south of Yobsville, Qld
Gender: male
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #43 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:52pm
 
aikmann4 wrote on Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:43pm:
Statistical analysis of children adopted by gay parents is required before we jump right into its widespread acceptance and institutionalization. If it can be determined that being raised in the household of a functional, normal gay couple is more likely than not a cause of the development of social pathologies amongst their children, then we have a fairly good reason to restrict the right of gay parents from adopting.


And what if it's determined that they're less likely to cause the development of social pathologies amongst their children?

Do we then encourage more gay and lesbian couples to adopt?
Back to top
 

"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013

Num num num num.
 
IP Logged
 
mellie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8142
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Same-sex adoption
Reply #44 - Sep 1st, 2010 at 2:52pm
 
Bare in mind, adoption is first about the 'child'  not those who wish to adopt them.

Being a kid is tough enough, why make it harder than it has to be for them to fit in at school?

I cant see too many heterosexual parents being OK with their own children sleeping over at a gay household, because unfortunately, there still exists much prejudice in our society.

It might not get said out-loud in polite company, but if my sons slumber party was any indication, (I will just add his gay-friend  has been beaten up more times than I can tell you in the last year)...  my son being a popular kid now protects him though....when he's at school, but the thing is, kids can be cruel, really really cruel, and I know for certain if it weren't for my son and his mates looking after this boy, then he would have left school well before now, and despite the protection my son offers his mate at school, the A-holes find a way of getting to him after school, tagging up his house, and all sorts of wretched things.

Recently, they binned his bag....up-ended the contents of his bag, turned it inside out and stuffed it in a school bin.

Apparently it's still cool to gay-bash among some uncouth yobs and their red-neck parents, so imagine what they would do if they knew another kids parents were gay?

Prejudice and intolerance is very real, so before passing these laws, I might suggest some security in our kids playgrounds might be a good idea.

I had one parent who called me (I think from the pub) and in no uncertain terms advise that my allowing my son to have gay friends would be one of the biggest mistakes of my life.

Naturally, this made me even more determined to allow this slumber party to go ahead!

And it did...without a hitch.

....... But there's still the predicable few who more or less egg their own children on to humiliate and degrade gay students at school, as though it were acceptable.

These attitudes aren't changed over night, and or by passing new bills, first-most, children should always be considered first.

Adopted parents always get the "You aren't my real parents anyway so you cant tell me what to do" thingy at some point...   it's inevitable, and it hurts, (My children's father was adopted), but imagine these kids going to school blowing off steam to mates, telling all about his/her gay parents, this and even condemning the situation themselves this and then after having done so, expecting things to be business as usual when they have gotten over their parent-war...  no way, it's not going to happen.

If anything, we will have kids suing a future government for having been deprived of an optimal environment, in the event their own lives somehow end up a wreck.

Not unlike we saw with indigenous children being adopted out to white family's and things not working out there also.

When will we learn to stop meddling?


Roll Eyes



Back to top
 

All together now Labor voters.......&&&&lap-tops, pink-bats refugees and Clunker-cars&&&&insurance.AES256
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 18
Send Topic Print