Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 31
st, 2010 at 6:02pm:
perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31
st, 2010 at 4:29pm:
What happened to the one decade you used to use, Andrei?
In any event, I never agreed with your assertion, when it was at 10 years and I certainly wouldn't agree to anything like 30 years!
It would take 10 years at the flat out pace of a Manhattan style project, Globally, to get geared up for a transition from Oil to something else, if something else was available, which it isn't!
If we waited for 30 years after Peaked Oil became reality, before then declaring Peak Oil and then moving into a mitigation phase, then you would not only consign the Global Economy to the toilet, but you would also shunt humanity toward extinction!
Now I know you have read enough about peak oil theory to know as much about as I do.
If you take a 5 year period, you would not encompass natural progression or regression trends on such a theory which transcends generations.
Take for example if you took the oil shock of the 1970s as the base of your theory. You'd think we'd run about by about 1987 on that.
Peak oil can be detected from the measurement over a decades long timegraph.
It cannot be detected by picking a short 5 year period and basing your argument on that.
5 years in a click of your fingers in the oil industry.
Remember also, the theory does not allowed for advances in technology - you are totally ignoring that.
In this decade we can map the entire ocean floor without drilling, we can go down to depths completely out of our reach only one decade ago.
We can drill further down on the ocean floor and at depths far beyond capability of the 1990s.
We can drill further, safer and cleaner.
Peak oil theory takes current known oil fields and applies little logic for advancement.
A dangerous game.
It may help to explain why the date that oil peak has happened has moved back 6 times.
In fact we originally were going to run out of oil in 1982 at one point....
Andrei,
Have a look at Table 1. Oil Production Through Time, in the following site, it details when various nations HAVE ALREADY PEAKED & THE EXPECTED DATES for others.
Although the report uses 1997 data, I think the majority of the Peak dates will prove to be around the mark. Of interest, they predicted 2002 would be Australia's Peak, which was spot on. They predicted Mexico had Peaked in 1998, it was actually 2003 before it really Peaked. They suggested that North Sea Oil would Peak in 2001, it actually Peaked in 1999.
In fact, of the 42 major Oil Production nations listed, they suggested that 37 would have Peaked by NOW, leaving a few of the older, super producers still to Peak, such as Saudi Arabia (in 2011), Kuwait (2018) & the UAE (2017).
No doubt there will be some ups & downs, a few years here and there, but in essence, we have Peaked!
Btw, I don't know where you get those gems about moving Peal Oil back 6 times or about Oil running out in 1982!
In fact, Hubbert said that USA Production would Peak around 1970-1972, it actually Peaked in 1970. Hubbert also said that Global Production would Peak just after 2000 and as far as I'm concerned it did effectively Peak in around 2005!
The rest of what you said, will make little difference in the overall grand scheme of events!
http://www.mnforsustain.org/oil_duncan_and_youngquist_encircling_oil.htm