mozzaok wrote on Aug 23
rd, 2010 at 9:47am:
Yes the tight numbers will mean that we will be likely to see a No Confidence vote sooner or later, due to unavoidable absences, which will mean that we will all be going back to the polls much sooner than we would like, but I for one hope that the people of Australia get to see the two independents, Windsor, and Oakeshott, performing well as part of a minority government, to inspire even more people to run as independents, and more people to vote for them.
Imn recent time we have seen most independents as single issue extremists that attract few votes from normal aussies, but really moderate, politically centrist independents seeking to represent their local electorate, and the nation, could make a great improvement to our parliament.
I think all preferences should detracted from the primary vote...why should a Labor government be allowed to desperately squander more money in order to grapple for a leadership they clearly don't deserve?
It's the only sensible thing to do.
Because should we head back to the polls, it's clear, the Labor party wont win anyway.
The only thing Labor had going for them were the Greens how-to-vote cards...without these, they wouldn't have stood a chance.
Would have been a Liberal victory.
Again, the Australian people have already decided, Gillard reminds me of one of those 'red faces' performers who have been gonged off the stage, though keep on performing.
Booo, hiss, Booo, take a hint ALP!
Australia don't want you.
Not even your own want you...being the dysfunctional little arrangements that you be.
the ALP is a sham.i