mozzaok wrote on Aug 22
nd, 2010 at 8:56am:
I agree philperth, and Labor lost votes to the Greens because people did not respect their pathetic pandering to all those seeking to demonise refugees, led by Tony Abbott.
My wife asked me, "How the heck do the Libs think they can promise to stop the boats?"
I told her they just had to return to treating refugees like the worst criminals in society, and locking them up in maximum security hellholes for years, like they used to, because the refugees won't want to come to a place that treats them so cruelly and unfairly.
All the Lib voters are fine with cruelty being directed at refugees, because it works, and they can justify it to themselves by believing that refugee=terrorist.
It is a very tough call to make, because the cruelty policy works, people just have to decide if they are prepared to accept their share of the responsibility for promoting that cruelty?
Re : "How the heck do the Libs think they can promise to stop the boats?"
Look at it this way, these poor asylum seekers are presently very few in number, but if allowed to continue, the numbers have a high likelihood of growing massively. These people are displaced, without representation or protection, and prone to being brutalised and taken advantage of, they are being placed on boats that are considered disposable in Indonesia etc. These boats are death traps. The people smuggling business has the potential to become the "Armada of Death", they are not seaworthy.
Do you want this on your conscience? Wouldn`t you rather try to save the lives of many by discouraging this horrible practice? A hard line is needed here, once the news of the futility of this practice gets out, the people smuggling business will all but dry up.