abu_rashid wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2010 at 7:32am:


That little 'propaganda' story is called history, and none can escape that fact. It happened.
So your assertions that the rulers of Egypt, Saudi, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq were and are traitors and agents of the Israeli's & British is unsubstantiated, as there is no proof of this.
If the Lebanese government was in the pocket of the British or Israeli's, Hezbollah would be just a bad memory and Israeli citizens near the border could live in peace without wondering when the next attack will come.
Whether you accept it or not, the Palestinians are the social lepers of the Muslim brotherhood by the actions taken against them every day by their own 'brothers', not solely by the policies of their political leaders.
Not even the Israeli's would dare treat them in such a fashion.
Perhaps the treatment of the Palestinians by their Muslim brothers could be explained by that old South American proverb, "Who needs revolutionaries once the revolution is over".
The reality is if the Muslim fraternitity was interested in the Palestinians having their own land, it would have happened long ago before Israel even existed.
The Ottomans had 500 years to make it so, the Jordanians and Egyptians could have also for a time.
However, none want them as a neighbour so the status quo remains.

Thanks it only just went up on Youtube
This is excellent too

We're not Giz......... !!!!!!!

From Ahl  AlQuran..International Quranic Centre

Eliminating Arab Discrimination against Palestinians



Throughout the Arab world, the Palestinians are subject to blatant discrimination with regard to employment opportunities, property ownership, freedom of movement, and acquisition of citizenship. For example, Saudi Arabia in 2004 announced it was introducing measures to ease the attainment of Saudi citizenship for all foreigners who were residing in the country except Palestinians, half a million of whom live in the kingdom.

Similar policies of discrimination are prevalent in other Arab states. A 2004 Los Angeles Times report painted a grim picture of the life Palestinians are forced to endure among the Arab “brethren.” According to the report, Palestinians in Egypt suffer restrictions on employment, education, and owning property, and when Egypt announced in 2003 that it would grant nationality to children of Egyptian mothers married to foreigners, Palestinians were excluded. In Lebanon, meanwhile, nearly 400,000 Palestinians live in 12 “refugee camps,” where crime is rife and clashes between rival Palestinian factions are common. Palestinians cannot own property or getstate health care. According to Tayseer Nasrallah, head of the Palestinian Refugee Rights Committee in the West Bank, Lebanon bans refugees from 72 areas of employment, including medicine and engineering. Syria, with a population of 18 million, is a strong verbal supporter of the Palestinian cause, but refuses citizenship to its 410,000 Palestinian refugees. Even in Jordan, where Palestinians comprise nearly 70% of the population, Palestinians complain that they are discriminated against in terms of employment.

When approached on this issue of discrimination against the Palestinian residents in Arab countries, Hisham Youssef, spokesman for the 22-nation Arab League, openly acknowledged that Palestinians live “in very bad conditions,” but claimed the policy is meant “to preserve their Palestinian identity.” He went on to explain with perhaps unintended candor: “If every Palestinian who sought refuge in a certain country was integrated and accommodated into that country, there won’t be any reason for them to return to Palestine.”

But according to a survey conducted by the well-known Palestinian pollster, Dr. Khalil Shikaki, most Palestinians were less interested in being nationalist standard-bearers than in living fuller lives. This view resonates strongly with opinion samples gathered by the leadingArab television stations Al-Arabiya and Al Jazeera of Palestinians living in the various Arab states, the vast majority of whom very much want to become citizens in the their respective countries of residence.

This clearly seems to indicate that Palestinian national identity is something more jealously guarded by non-Palestinian Arabs rather than the Palestinians themselves.

It is only the United Nations Relief and Works Agency that allows the Arab countries to continue to keep the Palestinians within their borders in their situation of suspended stateless animation. For while its mandate prevents finding a permanent solution for the Palestinian residents in these countries, it is the ongoing humanitarian aid that it provides for an ever-increasing client population that permits the host governments to sustain their discriminatory policy toward their Palestinian “guests,” to perpetuate their inferior status, and to allow their situation to languish and fester.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2010-09/03/c_13475890.htm


13 Palestinian armed groups vow to step up attacks against Israel

Militants of Palestinian armed factions, including members of Hamas, hold a press conference against the direct negotiations between Israel and Palestine in Washington, in Gaza City on Sept. 2, 2010. More than a dozen Palestinian militant groups on Thursday pledged to step up joint and separate attacks on Israeli targets to foil the peace negotiations which kicked off in Washington this week. (Xinhua/Wissam Nassar)

PEACE .............................my left foot

Was no myth

"It might detract from the myth that the tiny little Jewish state fought off 5 great huge Arab neighbours at once and gave them a whipping, but it certainly explains a lot when we actually know who was pulling the strings doesn't it?"

Only to your evil twisted mind....

Israel was alone. The US was not involved with Israel and Britain certainly wasn't

Watch the first video I posted