Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print
A nuclear Australia (Read 4778 times)
mellie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8142
Sydney
Gender: female
A nuclear Australia
Aug 14th, 2010 at 8:47pm
 
U.S. AEC, forerunner of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States Department of Energy spoke of electricity in the future being "too cheap to meter, this might be what's holding us back.

Cant impose a tax on what doesn't exist, ETS wise, now can we.


We could always impose a fresh air tax (FAT) or something I guess...

Ironically, since 2007, we have seen a sharp decline in new nuclear plants being added to the grid, 2008 being the first year ever whereby none were added, and only 1 or two (from memory) were added to the grid during 2009.

Even stranger, some countries formerly pro-nuclear appear to be closing their plants down, for no apparent reason at all.

Cool
Back to top
 

All together now Labor voters.......&&&&lap-tops, pink-bats refugees and Clunker-cars&&&&insurance.AES256
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: A nuclear Australia
Reply #1 - Aug 14th, 2010 at 9:16pm
 
mellie wrote on Aug 14th, 2010 at 8:47pm:
Ironically, since 2007, we have seen a sharp decline in new nuclear plants being added to the grid, 2008 being the first year ever whereby none were added, and only 1 or two (from memory) were added to the grid during 2009.

Even stranger, some countries formerly pro-nuclear appear to be closing their plants down, for no apparent reason at all.

Cool


It's not strange - it's obvious. It is too expensive and unpredictable and more advanced countries than us are embracing green technology. Even China is making an effort.

Besides the nuclear lobbyists aren't getting the financial support they're used to since the sub-prime crisis hit the US.

Let's hope it's a dying industry.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
deepthought
Gold Member
*****
Offline


In Defence Of Liberty

Posts: 2869
Re: A nuclear Australia
Reply #2 - Aug 14th, 2010 at 9:31pm
 
With a determination to go green and cut emissions the USA has resumed development of nuclear power generation after thirty years of no new stations.

And why not.

Pres Obama says a few kilograms of uranium is  better than 30 million barrels of oil and there are no emissions at all.

Who could argue with that.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
mellie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8142
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: A nuclear Australia
Reply #3 - Aug 14th, 2010 at 9:32pm
 
Fads come and go Mantra, i'm guessing nuclear will make a come back just as soon as our wells of prosperity all but dry up, I mean what's a gallon or two of oil spilled over our barrier reef, this or increasing dioxin levels in our marine life and produce between friends?

Nuclear is both New and Clear...hence nuclear Mantra ...(grinz)

This said, I can imagine you sitting here in 50 years time friction powering your laptop by means of um, er...exercise bike?  Wink



Back to top
 

All together now Labor voters.......&&&&lap-tops, pink-bats refugees and Clunker-cars&&&&insurance.AES256
 
IP Logged
 
mellie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8142
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: A nuclear Australia
Reply #4 - Aug 14th, 2010 at 9:33pm
 
deepthought wrote on Aug 14th, 2010 at 9:31pm:
With a determination to go green and cut emissions the USA has resumed development of nuclear power generation after thirty years of no new stations.

And why not.

Pres Obama says a few kilograms of uranium is  better than 30 million barrels of oil and there are no emissions at all.

Who could argue with that.


Not me, thats for sure.

Cool
Back to top
 

All together now Labor voters.......&&&&lap-tops, pink-bats refugees and Clunker-cars&&&&insurance.AES256
 
IP Logged
 
stryder
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4545
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: A nuclear Australia
Reply #5 - Aug 14th, 2010 at 9:45pm
 
Tell me Mellie, is France which is the biggest user of nuclear power are also shutting down there nuclear reactors one by one . ??
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: A nuclear Australia
Reply #6 - Aug 14th, 2010 at 9:47pm
 
mellie wrote on Aug 14th, 2010 at 9:32pm:
Fads come and go Mantra, i'm guessing nuclear will make a come back just as soon as our wells of prosperity all but dry up, I mean what's a gallon or two of oil spilled over our barrier reef, this or increasing dioxin levels in our marine life and produce between friends?


You could be right Mel, but some of us can live in hope that less toxic methods of power will be used in greater volume here in the near future.

Quote:
Nuclear is both New and Clear...hence nuclear Mantra ...(grinz)

This said, I can imagine you sitting here in 50 years time friction powering your laptop by means of um, er...exercise bike?  Wink


Haha. I should be so lucky.

Quote:
Pres Obama says a few kilograms of uranium is  better than 30 million barrels of oil and there are no emissions at all.

Who could argue with that.


He's following in the path of his predecessor - the same as our leader/s are doing.

Obama makes a good argument obviously, but NP stations dotted all over the planet aren't going to stop Texas Oil going out of business.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mellie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8142
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: A nuclear Australia
Reply #7 - Aug 14th, 2010 at 9:54pm
 
Quote:
Obama makes a good argument obviously, but NP stations dotted all over the planet aren't going to stop Texas Oil going out of business.
by -Mantra

No, but it will sure throw a spanner in the works.

Cool
Back to top
 

All together now Labor voters.......&&&&lap-tops, pink-bats refugees and Clunker-cars&&&&insurance.AES256
 
IP Logged
 
deepthought
Gold Member
*****
Offline


In Defence Of Liberty

Posts: 2869
Re: A nuclear Australia
Reply #8 - Aug 14th, 2010 at 10:11pm
 
mantra wrote on Aug 14th, 2010 at 9:47pm:
He's following in the path of his predecessor - the same as our leader/s are doing.


Derek is a George Bush sock puppet?

And Jules is operated by remote by Johnny?
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: A nuclear Australia
Reply #9 - Aug 14th, 2010 at 10:28pm
 
Following in the path of their predecessors, doesn't mean that previous leaders weren't being led by the World Order down that path also.  As much as I hate using the term World Order - there's no other way to describe these organisations. Howard was as much of a puppet as Gillard or Rudd, the difference being Howard had a more important role to fulfill because his co-operation was needed in the instigation of wars and trade agreements.

Certainly it has been noted that 12 of Obama's appointments to the Whitehouse are members of the Trilateral Commission.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
deepthought
Gold Member
*****
Offline


In Defence Of Liberty

Posts: 2869
Re: A nuclear Australia
Reply #10 - Aug 14th, 2010 at 10:33pm
 
mantra wrote on Aug 14th, 2010 at 10:28pm:
Following in the path of their predecessors, doesn't mean that previous leaders weren't being led by the World Order down that path also.  As much as I hate using the term World Order - there's no other way to describe these organisations. Howard was as much of a puppet as Gillard or Rudd, the difference being Howard had a more important role to fulfill because his co-operation was needed in the instigation of wars and trade agreements.

Certainly it has been noted that 12 of Obama's appointments to the Whitehouse are members of the Trilateral Commission.


This discussion has taken a strange twist.

Johnny cooperated with wars and trade agreements?

Jules and Kev, equally, are puppets?

I need to know more.


Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
mellie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8142
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: A nuclear Australia
Reply #11 - Aug 14th, 2010 at 10:37pm
 
Let us hope we have enough natural resources left to power our own nuclear plants if/when the time comes.


Bare in mind, we have been supplying the world with uranium for decades now.

It would be a bummer to learn that we don't even have enough to sustain our own clear future, for when the time comes.


Smiley
Back to top
 

All together now Labor voters.......&&&&lap-tops, pink-bats refugees and Clunker-cars&&&&insurance.AES256
 
IP Logged
 
mellie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8142
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: A nuclear Australia
Reply #12 - Aug 14th, 2010 at 10:41pm
 
mantra wrote on Aug 14th, 2010 at 10:28pm:
Following in the path of their predecessors, doesn't mean that previous leaders weren't being led by the World Order down that path also.  As much as I hate using the term World Order - there's no other way to describe these organisations. Howard was as much of a puppet as Gillard or Rudd, the difference being Howard had a more important role to fulfill because his co-operation was needed in the instigation of wars and trade agreements.

Certainly it has been noted that 12 of Obama's appointments to the Whitehouse are members of the Trilateral Commission.


Now, this is interesting....

Smiley
Back to top
 

All together now Labor voters.......&&&&lap-tops, pink-bats refugees and Clunker-cars&&&&insurance.AES256
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 118686
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: A nuclear Australia
Reply #13 - Aug 14th, 2010 at 10:41pm
 
Has anyone here considered a Thorium Reactor for Australia?
The Indians are well ahead of us.

See link:

http://spectrum.ieee.org/energy/nuclear/qa-thorium-reactor-designer-ratan-kumar-sinha
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
deepthought
Gold Member
*****
Offline


In Defence Of Liberty

Posts: 2869
Re: A nuclear Australia
Reply #14 - Aug 14th, 2010 at 10:49pm
 
mellie wrote on Aug 14th, 2010 at 10:37pm:
Let us hope we have enough natural resources left to power our own nuclear plants if/when the time comes.


Bare in mind, we have been supplying the world with uranium for decades now.

It would be a bummer to learn that we don't even have enough to sustain our own clear future, for when the time comes.


Smiley


Uranium is abundant in the earth's crust.

We will have developed fusion reactors before there is much chance of running out.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print