Australian Politics Forum - Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott

Equitist Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 9632 NSW	Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott Reply #75 - Jul 25^th, 2010 at 10:32pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 25^th, 2010 at 10:14pm: thy the nothyinker LOL...would you believe that: only minutes ago, I was considering dropping the 'Thy' off my ID!? How can I do that, when my nemeses seem to have so much fun toying with it!?
Back to top	Lamenting the shift in the Australian psyche, away from the egalitarian ideal of the fair-go - and the rise of short-sighted pollies, who worship the 'Growth Fairy' and seek to divide and conquer! IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 41675 Gender:	Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott Reply #76 - Jul 25^th, 2010 at 10:33pm true. have a good night mate
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

Cyberman

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 391

Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott
Reply #77 - Jul 25^th, 2010 at 10:36pm

Cyberman wrote on Jul 25^th, 2010 at 10:19pm:

Yes...that one didn't back your statements either Roll Eyes

It is not a false impression. You have continually spoken of 'attacked' and 'denigrated' voters.

All I ask is where did Abbott do this? Something you have consistently refused to address other than" oh look at my previous post'. Mentioning a pertinent point in a debate is not 'denigrating' or 'attacking' voters.

Now you need to show where this occurred or back slowly out of the thread and hope no one notices that you have embarrassed yourself

*bump* for Meekest

Back to top

IP Logged

Equitist

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9632
NSW

Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott
Reply #78 - Jul 25^th, 2010 at 11:21pm

Cyberman wrote on Jul 25^th, 2010 at 10:36pm:

Cyberman wrote on Jul 25^th, 2010 at 10:19pm:

Yes...that one didn't back your statements either Roll Eyes

It is not a false impression. You have continually spoken of 'attacked' and 'denigrated' voters.

All I ask is where did Abbott do this? Something you have consistently refused to address other than" oh look at my previous post'. Mentioning a pertinent point in a debate is not 'denigrating' or 'attacking' voters.

Now you need to show where this occurred or back slowly out of the thread and hope no one notices that you have embarrassed yourself

*bump* for Meekest

NOTICE FOR CYBERMAN ET AL

**** THE DEBATE IS CURRENTLY REPLAYING ON ABC24 ****

Watch around midnight for Abbott's closing statements

Pay attention and you will hear him mention the word "gender" -
then decide whether he was wise to make that statement!

Back to top

Lamenting the shift in the Australian psyche, away from the egalitarian ideal of the fair-go - and the rise of short-sighted pollies, who worship the 'Growth Fairy' and seek to divide and conquer!

IP Logged

Cyberman

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 391

Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott
Reply #79 - Jul 25^th, 2010 at 11:29pm

Why do I have to repeat myself?

I watched the debate and I heard what Abbott said. It is up to you you to prove that he 'attacked' and 'denigrated' voters as you have suggested.

You have avoided doing this all night and I suggest it is because you are not only deficient in defending your arguments, you are also deficient in logical thinking...but you seem to have the hang of highlighting text.

I suggest you stick to text that doesn't highlight your ignorance.

Back to top

IP Logged

Equitist

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9632
NSW

Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott
Reply #80 - Jul 25^th, 2010 at 11:38pm

Cyberman wrote on Jul 25^th, 2010 at 11:29pm:

Why do I have to repeat myself?

I watched the debate and I heard what Abbott said. It is up to you you to prove that he 'attacked' and 'denigrated' voters as you have suggested.

You have avoided doing this all night and I suggest it is because you are not only deficient in defending your arguments, you are also deficient in logical thinking...but you seem to have the hang of highlighting text.

I suggest you stick to text that doesn't highlight your ignorance.

LOL...you're sounding remarkably like a former Yahooligan Shitzu...

Meantime, what matters is not how ye and me interpret what he said, rather it is how the broader electorate responds to what he said...

Back to top

Lamenting the shift in the Australian psyche, away from the egalitarian ideal of the fair-go - and the rise of short-sighted pollies, who worship the 'Growth Fairy' and seek to divide and conquer!

IP Logged

Cyberman Senior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 391	Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott Reply #81 - Jul 25^th, 2010 at 11:42pm Yet another non-specific post against a specific question. If all I gain is your ability to think before you post, then I will have educated you. I hope the eduction sinks in
Back to top	IP Logged

Equitist

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9632
NSW

Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott
Reply #82 - Jul 25^th, 2010 at 11:47pm

Cyberman wrote on Jul 25^th, 2010 at 11:42pm:

Yet another non-specific post against a specific question.

If all I gain is your ability to think before you post, then I will have educated you. I hope the eduction sinks in

LOL...the arrogance of the yappy Shitzu is showing through too... Roll Eyes

Hmnnn...I wonder...which portrait most suits you: -

The arrogant 'Sad sack' with the blue ribbon or the cute 'Excitable Sam' with the yellow ones!?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jul 25^th, 2010 at 11:56pm by Equitist »

Lamenting the shift in the Australian psyche, away from the egalitarian ideal of the fair-go - and the rise of short-sighted pollies, who worship the 'Growth Fairy' and seek to divide and conquer!

IP Logged

Cyberman

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 391

Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott
Reply #83 - Jul 25^th, 2010 at 11:55pm

Yet another left trait comes to the fore.

I am not this Shitzu, just like I am not this IQ... what is it with you leftys. Do you have no self introspection that when multiple people show you that you're incorrect, the only defence you have is to accuse your adversary that they are someone else that saw through your bullsh!t?

Back to top

IP Logged

Equitist

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9632
NSW

Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott
Reply #84 - Jul 26^th, 2010 at 12:03am

Cyberman wrote on Jul 25^th, 2010 at 11:55pm:

Yet another left trait comes to the fore.

I am not this Shitzu, just like I am not this IQ... what is it with you leftys. Do you have no self introspection that when multiple people show you that you're incorrect, the only defence you have is to accuse your adversary that they are someone else that saw through your bullsh!t?

LOL...I was just testing to see if you were Macca in disguise - you can't be, as she can take a joke! Roll Eyes

Back to top

Lamenting the shift in the Australian psyche, away from the egalitarian ideal of the fair-go - and the rise of short-sighted pollies, who worship the 'Growth Fairy' and seek to divide and conquer!

IP Logged

Equitist Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 9632 NSW	Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott Reply #85 - Jul 26^th, 2010 at 12:16am OK, this time around I recorded the relevant Abbott comment from his concluding statement... His exact words were as follows: - Quote: ...whether Prime Ministers are to be chosen on the basis of the job they've done, or gender."
Back to top	« Last Edit: Jul 26^th, 2010 at 7:59am by Equitist » Lamenting the shift in the Australian psyche, away from the egalitarian ideal of the fair-go - and the rise of short-sighted pollies, who worship the 'Growth Fairy' and seek to divide and conquer! IP Logged

Cyberman Senior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 391	Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott Reply #86 - Jul 26^th, 2010 at 12:31am You just keep digging yourself a deeper hole. Where has he attacked or denigrated the voter? Are you dim, don't get the question or just plain smacking stupid (I'm guessing the latter considering your continual inability to address the actual question)
Back to top	IP Logged

Equitist

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9632
NSW

Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott
Reply #87 - Jul 26^th, 2010 at 7:58am

Here's a link to a transcript: -

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/special-reports/transcript-of-2010-federal-elec...

Here is the relevant extract in context: -

Quote:

Re-elect this Government and there’ll be six years of pink batt disasters and school hall rip-offs. There’ll be more spending, more backflips, more debt, more taxes. It will just get worse. There will be more hits on your standard of living. We’ll get a mining tax if Labor is elected. We’ll get a carbon tax if Labor is elected – thanks to the preference deal with the Greens that not even Bob Brown likes.

So this election will determine whether the Prime Minister is to be elected by the people or by the powerbrokers, whether Prime Ministers are to be chosen on the basis of the job they’ve done or gender and whether the national government should be run as a mates machine like the Labor Governments in New South Wales and Queensland. It’s about whether the public can trust the Labor Party when not even Kevin Rudd could.

Petty, negative, divisive and juvenile - that's just what his rusted-on supporters love. That's the attitude that Tony Abbott brings to the poor job that he is doing in connecting with the broader electorate!

Clearly, he has a lot of chips on his shoulders and he lacks the vision and maturity to constructively govern our nation!

Back to top

Lamenting the shift in the Australian psyche, away from the egalitarian ideal of the fair-go - and the rise of short-sighted pollies, who worship the 'Growth Fairy' and seek to divide and conquer!

IP Logged

Sprintcyclist

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 41675
Gender: male

Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott
Reply #88 - Jul 26^th, 2010 at 8:44am

thy- of course it is relevant and obvious to mention julia gender.

she's a female. she's the 1st female we have ever had to stand for pm.
many woman will vote for her becaiuse she is a woman.

Surely, you are not that naieve that you thynk it is irrelevant ??
did you see the worms for the female being strongly for jooolya

Back to top

Modern Classic Right Wing

IP Logged

skippy. Gold Member Offline Posts: 20882 Gender:	Re: Election Debate: Gillard v's Abbott Reply #89 - Jul 26^th, 2010 at 8:49am Yes but Abbotts obsessed with Gillards gender, and the fact she's single, the muncher opened his speeech with " Margie and I know what its like to raise a family" he also knows what its like to gobble priests but he never mentioned that.
Back to top	freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL Click onWWW below IP Logged