On this forum, on account of this board being rather stagnant and bias like so many political forums are this close to a federal election.

So, I might catch up with you all after the election, as I will be spending my time posting where views are not censored in accordance with the forum owners own marred political,religious persuasions.

Thankyou.

Nobody censored you.

You're an idiot.

Nobody deleted anything you wrote.

wait a sec mellie ..aren't you and the mods of the board barrick for the same politcal  party ? 


May I ask what got deleted ?   

mellie wrote on Jul 10^th, 2010 at 4:04pm:

feel free to drop me a line, though I wont be on until later tonight.
===================

Thanks for that .. 

A group of her posts were moved to general.

mellie<< You should alert posters to your agenda prior to inviting them here, this or using forums like Yahoos message boards to generate traffic to your site..>>

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

I think you will find that myself and a couple of others from Yahoo suggested people come to this forum, and not the administrator of ozpolitic. I think perhaps freediver popped into yahoo once but that was well after many of the yahooligans had signed up on here.

Funny thread,lol, see ya mellie, did you get sick of being proven wrong?

Lol, love the attachment, and will give this a bit more thought until school goes back, as I'm a little snowed under until then.

... Well, not technically, as I'm back from my almost snow trip..(well, It sleeted).

I thought my posts had been deleted on account of my coming here and seeing that they had all disappeared, (I thought I was not welcome to post here so stopped) I wasn't aware that this sites mods relocate them to other areas on ozpolitic.

Thank you, and I shall bare this in mind.

Have a lovely weekend all.

mellie wrote on Jul 11^th, 2010 at 1:38pm:


To what I remember, they posted saying they were doing so, and why. They also left the links in the original area for a wee while, and stated that the links would be deleted shortly.

adelcrow wrote on Jul 11^th, 2010 at 5:36pm:

the fat one is amanda vandstone

I think the posts in question may have been the ones about Gillard, when half a dozen or so posts all popped up one after the other saying they did not like her, and as they were all basically saying the same thing, they were condensed into a single thread.
I think it was just about keeping the place "neat", I am sure that FD would never delete anyone's posts because he found their political view different to his own, he has a very, very high standard as far as "freedom of speech" goes.
If he disagrees with your views, he will post reasons why, not delete your posts.

I have had times when he has moved a post I started to a different thread, because he thought it belonged there, which can be annoying, but it isn't censorship, just "housekeeping".

Also, when I get back, I will do something about my rather unattractive avatar,  it's hideous.

Quote:


Are you still trying to get my attention? I told you I'm just not that into liars.

muso wrote on Jul 12^th, 2010 at 1:50pm:


*blushes*

skippy. wrote on Jul 12^th, 2010 at 4:11pm:


1) Interest rates are up, and will sky-rocket after the election if Labor get in.  A matter of opinion, I guess.

2) A relative of mine advised my parents why his friend (A Labor member) believes his party are reluctant to fund ongoing support for care packages for autistic children,Fact!
Furthermore, autism has nothing to do with mental illness, it's like comparing schizophrenia with down-syndrome.

3) Unemployment has not been this high since the 1960's, irrespective of a Labor government trying to conceal the real figures/stats by means of artificially creating awkward and embarrassing employment opportunities ie (insulation and school buildings, and indigenous support workers etc)...jobs which were only ever meant to see them through the next election anyway.... yes?
Hence they have dramatically reduced their ABS (Australian Beuro of Statistics) funding, do you have any idea where the stats on unemployment are post 2008?

And as I corrected, these all time high unemployment figures apply to youth , under 25's, though I suspect the figures among other disadvantaged groups would be much higher than is being discussed, as they too are forced to compete with unskilled immigrants on visas entering our country willing to work cash in hand for a minimal rate of pay.

Face the facts....

Labors "BIG AUSTRALIA" concept has gone belly up, we dont have the infrastructure, the jobs, housing and or even desire to take on any more immigrants, refugees or otherwise.

In fact, it's this irresponsible immigration which sours opportunities for others who would otherwise immigrate to Australia to make a worthwhile contribution to our society.....this opposed to sapping our system like some ethnic minority groups do when they come here, live in housing commission houses with prestige cars parked in the driveway and illegally claim benefits for multiple wives.

Our welfare system was not set up to accommodate harems.
Sorry, was set up to cater for the traditional western nuclear family, single parented or otherwise.

 Not polygamous Muslims.

These are my views and opinions, they are not lies.
Just as your having called me a liar is your opinion, not fact.

Now, if you don't mind, I find your trolling rather monotonous and dull, so could you find a car to chase down the street, as I don't particularly enjoy interacting with you.

Reason, pointless.

Okey...Moving right along.......

mellie wrote on Jul 12^th, 2010 at 4:38pm:


I, for one, would be interested to know: what economic basis (or bases) do you have for stating that opinion?

Yer, well...that might explain the voodoo economics somewhat...

LOL, Mellie...I've gotta say that I think you are very creative with your voodoo art - especially when it comes to contriving juxtapositions, drawing flexible conclusions and building straw models...

Apparently, Mellie, there is at least one thing on which we can agree: there is no trickle-down effect - rather it is a tentacle-up effect!?

I, for one, do not believe the propaganda of the insatiable Growth Fairy - or his evil twin, the Good Greedy Witch of the West...

Polygamy can be eugenic or dysgenic depending upon the circumstances. Restricting poon to the finest male stock is good, but it leaves a lot of crummier men without a wife. This might be fine if the men would just die but they tend to seek partners from other gene-pools and that's a big gamble.

muso wrote on Jul 13^th, 2010 at 11:46am:


How would you know, given polygamy is illegal in this country, this and I doubt any of them are going to stand up and admit they form part of a neighbourhood harem, like the families I knew who lived in my suburb as a child (Guildford, Sydney, NSW).

Would you admit to breaking the law, this and decline parenting payments also?

This is the problem, and because the practise is illegal,  many of them marry overseas this and retain their maiden name here in Australia where their marriage isn't recognised, this and continue claiming benefits/cheating our welfare system polygamists or not.

I recall growing up in a neighbourhood whereby Muslim sandal/scuff wearing men in their 30's 40's and 50's would laze around out the front of the corner shop drinking tiny cups of coffee on milk crates, whilst smoking (I think tobacco) from a water-pipe ...one of my friends had no less than 12 siblings she referred to as her cousins, all of which lived in 3 houses in the same street, all of which had the same father. Bad back apparently!

So he was on a pension!

He had it made, and while my parents were out keeping his wives kids, they would sit around sipping tiny cups of syrupy coffee.

What a life!

....Our welfare system is set up to accommodate westerners, not Muslims who essentially resent our culture, way of life, even our people, this and are out for everything they can get.

And I'm not talking about the Christian ethnics, (they seem to assimilate better)...this and work hard, am referring to the Muslim woman who all too often spend their days lurking about the house or shops even when they could quite easily go out to work.

But then again, I suppose their cultural dress restricts their job prospects somewhat, much to their advantage.

Ever seen a Muslim woman working anywhere?

Apart from the family owned corner store or fruit shop this is?

And even then, usually, cash in hand, for a relative off the books.

It's in their nature to cheat the system and rip people off....it's called survival back in Iran/Turkey, etc.

This said, I have met some lovely Muslim people, just so many of them are not overly keen on westerners, that's all.

When I was 13, my Muslim friend Abir was sent to Lebanon for a holiday, (well, so I thought), when she returned 12 months later with a 40'sh year old husband and heavily pregnant.

She was only 13 when she left.

She recognised me in the street, but with her cultural head-gear on, I had no idea it was even her, she was a bright girl, was in my advanced maths class.

She left school after this...last I heard she was pregnant with baby number 4.

Dunno about anybody else, but I was disturbed to recently hear the statistical prediction that more than 1/3 of Aussies will never reproduce...

Whilst that came as so real surprise to me, I believe this trend is a sad psycho-social indictment upon the devolution of humanity into mere units of economic production - who have been insidiously-conditioned from birth, to feel inadequate and insecure...to compete in the crazy rat race, by frantically chasing their tails to work and consume (and borrow)...to feed the insatiable and destructive Growth Fairy and his evil twin the Good Greedy Witch of the West...

I would think you'd be a little more careful about accusing the mods of banning your avatar after you were proven wrong about them deleting your posts.

Er.. the mods didn't remove your avatar. The site it was hosted on obviously did. If the mods here had removed it, they wouldn't have left behind the image that's in its place now.

aikmann4 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2010 at 1:53pm:


If this were the case, then this same image would have simultaneously disappeared from a number of other sites which host this same image, yes?

I might wait for a mods input on this I think, either way, a response isn't really necessary.

My apologies if some of you found this image most disturbing, now you have something in common with my poor children when they have the misfortune of having to greet me at the breakfast table each morning, hair airbrushed!!!

And Annie, you appear to be more unsettled about this than I am, when quite frankly dear, I don't give a damn.

I actually find it amusing, ....  again, my apologies .

Was I supposed to feel offended?


..I found it more ironic than offensive.

So has it actually disappeared from other sites or not?

Annie Anthrax wrote on Jul 13^th, 2010 at 1:59pm:


Vendetta?   pmsl... no, I was merely curious as to whether I had unwittingly breached this boards TOS, given I had used my actual/real image.

This and just wanted to alert this sites mods to the obvious fact that I was not aware this was a breach of TOS when I put it up.

If this is the case, then again my apologies.

mantra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2010 at 2:12pm:



Not a problem Mantra, if I put another up, I'll be sure to use one which is compliant with this boards format.

Lol Super-size me mantra....

I'll do it some other time, I'm supposed to submit something I have written by 5pm today....and still haven't edited it.

I will get that done first, then come back later on if I have time.

It's only 500 words, shouldn't take me more than 30 or so mins...an hour max!

  Oh, btw, are you mantra from Cracker.com.au?

If so, long time no see/post.


bbl

mellie wrote on Jul 13^th, 2010 at 2:24pm:


If you are the real "Mel" from Cracker - glad to know you're still around.

You just gave one then, so obviously you do.

What a robot!

mozzaok wrote on Jul 12^th, 2010 at 4:57pm:

Thats your opinion mozz, mellie likes to tell untruths, I ask her for proof, she never supplies it.
She's a female version of boofy.

muso wrote on Jul 13^th, 2010 at 3:57pm:



Yes, right you are, I would be very embarrassed if you did this for I feel embarrassed enough that I "illegally" posted it here to begin with, and thought that it would have been too tiny for anyone to be able to determine much of anything really... other than the fact that I am white with brown hair and own a cream jacket..lol... so we might skip the poll thingy...*cringe*

...but thank you muso, I really am quite flattered that you liked my avatar.

Here's your broom, what's your hurry!?

I couldn't agree with you more Deb....re- the fan club thingy.

perceptions_now wrote on Jul 14^th, 2010 at 12:27pm:


Non-proliferation Treaty?