Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 ... 117
Send Topic Print
For the Record (Read 223694 times)
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: For the Record
Reply #675 - Apr 21st, 2012 at 6:08pm
 
So we all borrow money to give to the IMF so they can give it to countries that have borrowed too much money and can't pay it back. It's a strange set of circumstances. I hope they remember this when it's our time to get bailed out.

Australia gives $7b to Europe bailout fund

AUSTRALIA is among the nations contributing to the International Monetary Fund's war chest to protect against further financial deterioration in Europe.

Overnight the IMF said it had raised more than $US430 billion ($417 billion) in an effort to assure finance markets that it has sufficient firepower to handle any new problems from Europe's prolonged debt crisis.

Treasurer Wayne Swan said Australia would contribute $7 billion to this.

"These resources will increase the lending capacity of the IMF and enable it to play its systemic role for the benefit of all members," he said in a statement from Washington DC.

Other countries contributing to the fund include Singapore ($4 billion), South Korea ($15 billion) and the United Kingdom ($15 billion).

http://www.news.com.au/business/australia-gives-7b-to-europe-bailout-fund/story-...
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: For the Record
Reply #676 - Apr 22nd, 2012 at 2:22pm
 
The wave of fiscal freedom continues to take its toll.  Who next? Not us, we're the fiscal  stalwarts. I wonder if the $430 billion will be enough?
...........................................................................

Dutch Austerity Talks Fail as Geithner Prods Europe


BRUSSELS — More uncertainty loomed for the euro zone on Saturday after the prime minister of the Netherlands, Mark Rutte, said he expected new elections to take place following the collapse of talks on new austerity measures.

The announcement is unwelcome news for Europe’s single currency zone, particularly because the Netherlands is one of just four countries using the euro currency that have maintained a coveted AAA credit rating.

Over the weekend, officials from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank met in Washington and sought ways to bolster contingency plans if the debt crisis in Europe worsened. The United States Treasury secretary, Timothy F. Geithner, declined to pledge any new money to a rescue fund but urged European leaders to be aggressive.

“The success of the next phase of the crisis response will hinge on Europe’s willingness and ability, together with the European Central Bank, to apply its tools and processes creatively, flexibly and aggressively to support countries as they implement reforms and stay ahead of markets,” he said Saturday.

The Dutch government has taken a tough line on bailouts for Greece and given strong support to Germany’s efforts to force through a new pact on fiscal responsibility in the euro zone.

But the country’s domestic politics have been plunged into crisis because targets for the budget deficit, laid down by the European Union, were missed.

On Saturday it became clear that a package of measures that had been under negotiation for several weeks, intended to save about 14 billion euros, or $18 billion, would not be supported by the Freedom Party, led by Geert Wilders, a populist right-wing and anti-Islam campaigner. The proposal included spending curbs and tax increases.

“Elections are to be expected now,” said Mr. Rutte, who has held power since 2010 and who added that he would consult the Dutch parliament on how to proceed, Reuters reported.

Although he has never been a formal part of the coalition government, Mr. Wilders’s support on major issues was crucial for Mr. Rutte to have a functioning parliamentary majority. Mr. Wilders has spoken out against bailing out other euro zone members.

“I had hoped we would work something out, but this package is unacceptable for our party and the country,” Mr. Wilders told reporters, according to Reuters. “It’s time to go to the Dutch voters.”

In Washington, the Dutch finance minister, Jan Kees de Jager, said that Europe had made significant progress toward quieting its sovereign-debt crisis through closer fiscal coordination and austerity budgeting.

But he also sought to turn attention from Europe, arguing that big debts in countries including Japan and the United States remained threats to international financial stability, even if they were out of the “limelight.”

“Not all risks emanate from Europe,” Mr. de Jager told the International Monetary and Financial Committee of the I.M.F. on Saturday. “There are key medium-term risks elsewhere in the world, which must also urgently be addressed.”

Nevertheless, international attention has focused on the Continent this weekend in Washington. Countries in the euro zone and international partners — mostly wealthy economies, including Japan, Norway, Britain and Switzerland — pledged more than $430 billion to the monetary fund to help guard against any runs on sovereign debt within the euro zone and to protect countries that might be innocent bystanders to the crisis, the fund announced on Friday.

But that money comes with the understanding that Europe will be vigilant in fighting off speculative attacks, bringing down unwieldy budgets and spurring growth — even as political changes come, like those looming in the Netherlands and France.

Some countries declined to provide additional I.M.F. financing, arguing that the fund had enough spare capacity and that Europe needed to be more aggressive in solving its problems.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/22/world/europe/budget-talks-collapse-in-the-neth...




Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #677 - Apr 22nd, 2012 at 3:37pm
 
total theft

thanks for coming swany

namaste
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: For the Record
Reply #678 - May 18th, 2012 at 4:56pm
 
Moody’s cuts ratings of 16 Spanish banks

The European banking industry has suffered another crushing blow after Moody’s ratings agency downgraded the credit ratings of 16 Spanish banks, citing the weakened government’s ability to support some banks.

The agency downgraded the long-term debt and deposit ratings by one to three notches for 16 Spanish banks and Santander UK PLC, a UK-domiciled subsidiary of Banco Santander SA.

Among those downgraded on Thursday are Spain's two largest banks, Banco Santander (Spain) SA and Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA.

The debt and deposit ratings declined by one notch for five banks, by two notches for three banks and by three notches for nine banks. The short-term ratings for 13 banks have also been downgraded between one and two notches, triggered by the long-term ratings changes.

The outlooks on the debt and deposit ratings for ten of the 17 banks downgraded today are now negative. For the remaining seven banks affected by today's actions, their ratings remain on review for a further downgrade.

Also on Thursday, Moody’s downgraded the ratings of the Spanish regions of Catalunya, Murcia, Andalucia and Extremadura due to their poor fiscal performance in 2011 and the low probability that the regional governments will be able to meet the 2012 deficit target set by the central government.

Author and professor of economics Philipp Bagus thinks that the news may eventually force the Spanish government to bail out or even nationalize some banks.
“As deposits are leaving, Spanish and also Greek banks [will be experiencing even more difficulties]. That means that there will be more pressure on the governments to bail out their banks,”

he told RT.
“So far implicit, the public debt now becomes explicit, so the public debt burden increases, and the increasing market pressure on these governments will encourage them to do some real reforms – otherwise they will have to default.”

The Spanish downgrade comes shortly after the agency cut the ratings of 26 Italian banks on May 14, including Italy’s largest, UniCredit and Intesa Sanpaolo. Moody’s dropped its long-term debt and deposit ratings for financial institutions due to the recession, tough austerity measures and €1.9 trillion of outstanding public debt. This resulted in lower loan demand and more loan losses for Italian banks.

The move comes as no surprise. Moody’s has been poised to cut the ratings cut since February, when the agency announced it was planning to downgrade 122 European financial institutions by May. The ratings of 114 banks and nine investment banks from 16 European countries were put under consideration, with the downgrade risks mainly relating to the eurozone periphery.
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: For the Record
Reply #679 - May 28th, 2012 at 2:42pm
 
This is an interesting article. It is true that the homeless and jobless should not be left out there to rot away.
........................................................................

By Paul Krugman

Easy Useless Economics

A few days ago, I read an authoritative-sounding paper in The American Economic Review, one of the leading journals in the field, arguing at length that the nation’s high unemployment rate had deep structural roots and wasn’t amenable to any quick solution. The author’s diagnosis was that the U.S. economy just wasn’t flexible enough to cope with rapid technological change. The paper was especially critical of programs like unemployment insurance, which it argued actually hurt workers because they reduced the incentive to adjust.

O.K., there’s something I didn’t tell you: The paper in question was published in June 1939. Just a few months later, World War II broke out, and the United States — though not yet at war itself — began a large military buildup, finally providing fiscal stimulus on a scale commensurate with the depth of the slump. And, in the two years after that article about the impossibility of rapid job creation was published, U.S. nonfarm employment rose 20 percent — the equivalent of creating 26 million jobs today.

So now we’re in another depression, not as bad as the last one, but bad enough. And, once again, authoritative-sounding figures insist that our problems are “structural,” that they can’t be fixed quickly. We must focus on the long run, such people say, believing that they are being responsible. But the reality is that they’re being deeply irresponsible.

What does it mean to say that we have a structural unemployment problem? The usual version involves the claim that American workers are stuck in the wrong industries or with the wrong skills. A widely cited recent article by Raghuram Rajan of the University of Chicago asserts that the problem is the need to move workers out of the “bloated” housing, finance and government sectors.

Actually, government employment per capita has been more or less flat for decades, but never mind — the main point is that contrary to what such stories suggest, job losses since the crisis began haven’t mainly been in industries that arguably got too big in the bubble years. Instead, the economy has bled jobs across the board, in just about every sector and every occupation, just as it did in the 1930s. Also, if the problem was that many workers have the wrong skills or are in the wrong place, you’d expect workers with the right skills in the right place to be getting big wage increases; in reality, there are very few winners in the work force.

All of this strongly suggests that we’re suffering not from the teething pains of some kind of structural transition that must gradually run its course but rather from an overall lack of sufficient demand — the kind of lack that could and should be cured quickly with government programs designed to boost spending.

So what’s with the obsessive push to declare our problems “structural”? And, yes, I mean obsessive. Economists have been debating this issue for several years, and the structuralistas won’t take no for an answer, no matter how much contrary evidence is presented.

The answer, I’d suggest, lies in the way claims that our problems are deep and structural offer an excuse for not acting, for doing nothing to alleviate the plight of the unemployed.

Of course, structuralistas say they are not making excuses. They say that their real point is that we should focus not on quick fixes but on the long run — although it’s usually far from clear what, exactly, the long-run policy is supposed to be, other than the fact that it involves inflicting pain on workers and the poor.

Anyway, John Maynard Keynes had these peoples’ number more than 80 years ago. “But this long run,” he wrote, “is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is long past the sea is flat again.”

I would only add that inventing reasons not to do anything about current unemployment isn’t just cruel and wasteful, it’s bad long-run policy, too. For there is growing evidence that the corrosive effects of high unemployment will cast a shadow over the economy for many years to come. Every time some self-important politician or pundit starts going on about how deficits are a burden on the next generation, remember that the biggest problem facing young Americans today isn’t the future burden of debt — a burden, by the way, that premature spending cuts probably make worse, not better. It is, rather, the lack of jobs, which is preventing many graduates from getting started on their working lives.

So all this talk about structural unemployment isn’t about facing up to our real problems; it’s about avoiding them, and taking the easy, useless way out. And it’s time for it to stop.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/11/opinion/krugman-easy-useless-economics.html?_r...
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: For the Record
Reply #680 - Jun 5th, 2012 at 4:12pm
 
Interest rates at 3.5% after another 0.25% cut today. When was the last time they were this low?
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: For the Record
Reply #681 - Jun 8th, 2012 at 9:09am
 
Spain needs another bailout. Since we are the economic envy of the world, perhaps we should offer some $$$$$. Are they quite white enough for us to help? They have a distinctly dark tan, maybe, maybe not.
................................................................

Fitch cuts Spain’s rating three notches to BBB

Fitch Ratings moved to cut Spain’s sovereign credit rating from A to BBB, a three-notch downgrade that has put the country a mere two notches above junk status. The agency further predicts a negative outlook for Spanish debt's creditworthiness.
Fitch said the Spanish downgrade reflected several realities, including the high cost of “restructuring and recapitalizing” the country's banking sector, massive government debt that is expected to peak at 95 per cent of GDP in 2015, Spain’s high level of foreign indebtedness, and the likelihood that the current recession will last well into 2013.
Fitch further cited contagion from Greece and the unlikelihood that the Spanish government had the resolve to intervene decisively to restructure the banking sector as reasons for the cut. The agency noted "the latest episode of the systemic eurozone crisis" following the inconclusive May 6 Greek general election as a factor that had darkened Spain's economic prospects.
The new rating was Spain's lowest among the "Big Three" credit rating agencies, the other two being Moody's and Standard & Poor's.
The downgrade follows a newfound pessimism on the part of Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy. On Thursday, Rajoy backed away from his position that Spain’s banking sector would not need an external bailout. He said that before speculating on how much the banking sector might need for recapitalization, the outcome of an IMF report next week and two further independent audits were needed.
Previously, Rajoy had towed the line that despite the implosion of a housing bubble which left Spanish banks saddled with a high percentage of foreclosed-upon properties and non-performing loans, an external rescue would not be necessary. 
Fitch for its part predicted the cost of recapitalizing the banking sector at between 60 billion and 100 billion euro.

(Swanny's got that in loose change)

http://www.rt.com/news/fitch-downgrades-spain-bbb-313/
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
Grey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #682 - Jun 9th, 2012 at 12:26pm
 
Catalunya and Andalucia have abolished money and increased productivity before, they should do it again.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Revolution
Back to top
 

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #683 - Jun 19th, 2012 at 11:42pm
 
The following article provides some reasonable indicators of where the Global Economy is placed & also the reasons why we have an intractable dilemma.

==========================
The Unavoidable U.S. Reality: The Upcoming Economic Collapse


The US, and much of the world, faces an unavoidable reality. There must be a severe economic collapse before we can proceed with the next period of sustained economic growth. This scenario is based on fundamental economic theory and a long history of what happens when the current economic conditions persist and are worsening.

This unavoidable reality is clearly demonstrated by the fundamentally opposing policies of the American right and left. The right, represented by the Tea Party, has both the clearest policies and the least supportable views in terms of economic theory and the real history of the world. The Tea Party's economic plan is to lower taxes, primarily to the richest. To balance the budget, it plans to cut benefits, primarily to those most in need. This strategy will do severe damage to the pretense of a social safety network. A fundamental reason for cutting taxes to the rich is that they will invest and thereby enrich the whole community.

The Tea Party plan fails based on three critical parameters:

    Classic economic theory.
    Historical fact in similar circumstances.
    Common sense.
First, let´s discuss classical economic theory. GDP (Gross Domestic Product) is the measure of how an economy is doing. GDP is the measure of our total annual income. When GDP goes up, people naturally tend to invest. When it goes down, people naturally tend not to invest. GDP is the sum of all spending by the people (the private sector) plus all the spending of the government (government sector) plus net exports (the net balance between exports and imports). If exports are greater than imports, the net balance adds to the GDP. If imports exceed exports, the net balance decreases the GDP.

The Tea Party Plan will substantially lessen the government spending. First, it plans to bring deficit under control, apparently very quickly. Total US government income in 2012 is $2.5 trillion and expense is $3.8 trillion, meaning there is a 50% shortfall in income. (Any private business that spent $3 for every $2 of income would be out of business long ago!) However, any meaningful Tea Party cut in government spending will have enormous negative effects on the GDP.

Furthermore, there is the multiplier effect. The multiplier effect is the reduction in spending by all classes except the richest because they have less to spend, particularly when many lose their job. In short, reducing government spending by one dollar will end up reducing GDP by much more than one dollar because of the multiplier effect. Classic economic theory is clear that reducing GDP is not the way to create growth and wealth in the US.

To see this empirically, we can look at the second measure of the Tea Party Plan, which is the historical fact in similar circumstances. First, let´s look at England today. England is a government that is taking a measured, middle of the road approach with some spending cuts, but with consideration for the social safety net. Actually, England's GDP is declining year after year, with great frustration for it´s government.

Then we can look at an out of control situation such as Greece. Each cut in government spending simply makes matters that much worse for the country. And finally, I strongly recommend Rogoff's and Reinhart's book, "This Time is Different" - which looks at hundreds of years of history and countries all over the world. When countries get to the position of the US, one of two things happen. The amount of indebtedness becomes so high, the world loses faith in the country to pay. The result is sky rocking interest rates and financial collapse. You can see this movie in real time looking at Greece and Spain at this moment.

Alternatively, the country tries to deal with the problem by cutting expenses, but brings on the problem sooner. The tendency of the US is to "kick the can down the road". It makes the US today to seem to be following Greece and Spain.

Thirdly, let´s discuss common sense as the third measure where the Tea Party Plan fails to work. The allegation that lower taxes will produce the incentive to invest is simply not true. People invest because they believe they can make money. The cutting of government expenses will dramatically cut GDP with the multiplier effect. People invest in a growing economy and new opportunities. People do not invest in a shrinking economy without good opportunities. Investors invest to make money. If the economy is falling, no one will invest even if the tax rate is zero.

In short, the Tea Party Plan fails to make sense by three powerful criteria. The Tea Party Plan will fail, and bring on the economic collapse. Perhaps its only virtue is that it will bring on the economic collapse problem sooner than the Democratic approach, which ultimately tends to be more painful because the taxpayer ends up owing much more.

The Democratic position is best represented by Paul Krugman. Krugman's position comes down to Stimulus is the only remedy given where we are. He does not argue that it will go on forever, but simply long enough to get us out of the problem where the economy can then survive on its own.

I do not agree that stimulus can fix the problem. Stimulus, like cocaine, is addictive. We have now ballooned the deficits to a place where there is no way to go back without the horrific economic adjustment.

Does stimulus work?
Now, however, we have to ask the question "Does economic stimulus work?" Since this is the principal downturn fighting tool currently being used by major governments, the question and its answer is very relevant.

One of our brightest academics is Paul Krugman who in his recent book The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008 analyzed whether stimulus works. He comes to the surprising conclusion that sometimes it works and sometimes it does not work. But he doesn't know why. I do know why it sometimes works and other times do not work.

I call this concept the 'Limitation to Stimulus'. Stimulus works in the beginning and middle of economic cycles but does not work at the end of the economic cycle. At the beginning and middle of the economic cycle, there are useful areas to invest stimulus money. At the end of the economic cycle, there are no useful areas to invest in and the money goes to worthless investments that ultimately go broke.

In short, much of the money invested in stimulus at the end of a major economic cycle simply defers the moment of truth and builds a larger bubble to blow up a little further down the road. Much of the money now being invested in stimulus will ultimately be lost and make it infinitely worse for the citizens who will inherit staggering losses of their government and have to pay ultimately much higher taxes.

Let's summarize the position on Stimulus. It will fail this time because we are at the end of a historical bubble where there are very few worthwhile investment opportunities. The multiplier effect on stimulus money has been reduced to near zero for lack of a favorable investment environment.

In short, stimulus will fail because of inadequate places to profitably invest the money. The four points below illustrate the complexity of Stimulus.

1. The safety of US Government Debt.
For most of us, this is sacred. Yet, behind the scenes of the stimulus, lies the disguised reduction of interest rates as a major strategy to keep the US debt sales viable in international markets. While debt has increased by 90% in the last six years (from $8.4 trillion to $16 trillion), the cost of the funding this debt is essentially the same at $400 billion. The average interest rate paid is down from 5% p.a. 6 years ago to 2.7% p.a. today.

The Fed has driven the short, medium and long-term interest rates to the lowest level in history as part of the Stimulus program. Interest rates exceeded 12% when Fed Chairman Paul Volker dealt with the last big bubble in the early 80s. US government interest costs have averaged about 6% during the last 50 years. Interest costs of 16% p.a. would mean the entire tax revenues of the US government would go to pay the debt and there would not be any money to pay for any US government costs, including Social Security, Medicare and defense.

Since interest rates hit near 12% the last time we had to fix the debt problem with Fed Chairmen Volker, we must see the high probability that the cost of US interest will increase dramatically at some time in the future. Reinhart and Rogoff estimate that the relation of debt to GDP over 90% is generally an indicator of a country with a structural debt problem that is likely to end in collapse.

This year, the United States passed the 100% mark for debt to GDP. Furthermore, debt is growing over a trillion dollars per year. The stage is set for a catastrophe, where the cost of interest on the US debt can soar, making it obvious to creditors of the inability of the US to pay its debt obligations. While we do not know the date this catastrophe will happen, it will become inevitable assuming the present trend continues. See Greece and Spain for what they are: the present day reality for them is what the US will experience later with the current deficit trend.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #684 - Jun 19th, 2012 at 11:43pm
 
The Unavoidable U.S. Reality: The Upcoming Economic Collapse (Con't)


2. The safety of the derivatives market.
There is approximately a $600 trillion notional value market in derivatives. The derivative market is designed to fundamentally be a means of eliminating risk. If you have a variable cost loan, you can buy interest rate swap that permits you to lock in you cost. If you are concerned that your loans to Italy are at risk, you can buy a derivative to protect you. So in theory, this is a market of large numbers, but in theory should have very little risk.

In reality, this is the biggest casino in the world for a small part of the total players. Principally, the risk is concentrated in those selling the coverage, not those buying the coverage. Yet it takes only one important player a la AIG (American International Group of insurance companies) to bring the system down. The US government had to put in $150 billion to save AIG in 2008. If the US had not done so, it would probably have brought down Goldman Sachs and many others in addition to AIG.

One big player that defaults puts the whole system in risk of default as one bank collapse brings on another bank collapse. It would take a 3 % loss in the derivatives market to wipe out the worldwide capital of the banking system in the world. The probability that numerous of the world's major banks will fail in the coming years due to derivatives is extremely high, putting at risk the solvency of the worldwide banking system.

3. Making the US Banking System Safer.
Stimulus has lowered the long-term cost of funds to be very similar to the short-term cost of funds. Therefore, traditional banking has very little ability to make money the old-fashioned way as most of the profit has disappeared from its traditional form of making money because Stimulus has pushed long and short rates down so far.

The US banking system is being driven to take higher risk bets because its traditional profit structure has been harmed by Stimulus. Most of the higher risk items are closer to betting at the casino than traditional banking. There is a high probability that many of the world's major banks fail in the coming years, primarily because of lower gross margins on lending, bad credit or high risks on derivatives. This week, Spain's largest bank, Bankia, failed due to bad real estate loans and has to be bailed out with $125 billion of government funds. The financial cost for bailouts will begin to soar shortly, first in Europe and later in the US.

4. The safety of the US residential and commercial real estate markets.
While the perception exists that the real estate market may be on the mend, the fact is average prices are down over 19% on average since 2007. Untold losses still exist there, but most people could not take another 20% to 30% drop in prices. If any one of the three issues above explodes, it will inevitably lead to another round of declining prices in real estate - which affects not only the individual homeowners, but the viability of the banking system and the enormous bond and derivative market associated with the underlying real estate loans.

The above explains why stimulus cannot work at this time and the negative unintended consequences for large parts of our financial system coming from the well meaning Stimulus by the Fed.

Furthermore, we must now add in the polarization of the political process between the Tea Party on the right and the Democratic left. The traditional US government is effectively paralyzed due to the inability of the parties to find common ground. This is largely, but not exclusively due to Tea party intransigence. The political process is effectively paralyzed and cannot take essential decisions to solve the problem.

Furthermore, it is my belief that the polarization of the political parties is not the cause of the problem, but a consequence of the problem.

In January 2011, I wrote an article "A Possible Market Timeline to 2015". This article made a number of predictions about how this market would develop in the coming years. This article predicted the Southern European countries banks would fall and this would invariably lead to contagion in Europe that would then follow to the US. These scenarios seem to be playing out very much as described in this article of 18 months ago. This article in some ways complements the views expressed here, although it focused more on the coming events than the underlying causes for why they will happen.

Summarizing:
    The Tea Party position is shown to be not practical by three critical measures: economic theory, historical fact in similar circumstances, and common sense.
    The Democratic position supports Stimulus as the solution. But stimulus will only defer the problem; it is not capable of solving the problem at this stage of the economic cycle. We are at the end of a historical bubble where there is no real place to profitably make new investments that will have a positive multiplier effect on the economy, an essential condition to making stimulus work.
    The inevitable consequence is that shortly (possibly months or a couple of years), the US and most of the developed world will enter into a several year-long major economic decline causing terrible consequences. Nearly all people will be affected negatively, including billions of the world's inhabitants that will experience truly terrible economic upheaval. An extremely small minority will see and understand the coming collapse and be able to actually improve their economic position. I hope to be among them.
    As always with economic and business cycles,
the downturn will end after several years and the world will begin a major new cycle of economic renewal and growth.


Link -
http://seekingalpha.com/article/652661-the-unavoidable-u-s-reality-the-upcoming-...
===============================

As I said earlier, this author does provide some reasonable indicators of what is happening & why.

In fact, IF this current scenario had happened at nearly any other time during the modern era, say over the last 150-200 years, I would also agree with his final assumption that
the downturn will end after several years and the world will begin a major new cycle of economic renewal and growth. 


However, whilst there are a great many things that can & do, affect the everyday health, wealth & general lives of every human, it is also true that there are only a few things that affect humanity on a global basis, over time.

Of these, the most influential have been, are now & will be over the coming decades -
1) Demographics - It has been & will continue to be, the major influence on Global Economics, as it provides the basis for Demand of the full range of "Products & Services".

Since the Global birthrate bottomed out around 1933 and then started to grow, including the massive additions of the "Baby Boomers" from 1945-1964, Demographics has virtually guaranteed grow in the Global Economy, albeit within the usual "Boom/Bust" Economic cycles.

However, this situation has started to wind down, via the massive Baby Boomer generation. As they first go into retirement & then leave us forever, the Boomers are leading Demand irrevocably lower, as they go into a more frugal retirement mode and by virtue that the numbers in following generations are too few to regenerate Demand, particularly in the Larger end of the housing market.

2) Energy - Along with Demographics, the other great influencer of modern Economics & indeed life in general, has been the sheer abundance of Energy to fill our Energy needs, the cheapness of that Energy & the amount of Spare capacity in the Global production of Energy.

First via Coal & then via Crude Oil, that situation enabled a massive increase in productivity, which literally fueled the massive jump in the modern Global Economy, along with Population increases.

However, that has also started to wind down, with many countries already experiencing a slow decline in the Production of Coal, including the current production being of lower grades and therefore less Energy output, but also & more importantly the decline in Crude Oil Production, which is now relentless and has already seen the Oil Price per barrel go from $10 to nearly US$150 per barrel, from 1999 to 2008, before falling back to around US$35 per barrel, then regaining ground to trade etween US$80-100.

As the Global Economy slows again, the Oil Price will again fall, perhaps not as much this time, before finally starting a relentless rise, due to the imperatives of "Demand & Supply".

Unless a new, currently unknown Energy source comes from a well hidden place & does so very quickly, then the impact on Demand & Economics in general will be truly massive!

3) Climate - We, the Human Race, have experienced a very favourable climatic period, for thousands of years, with the minor impact of the Medieval "Little Ice Age".

This period assisted our agriculture, our transport & in enabling our Populations to grow, assistling in the growth of our modern Economy.

However, scientific records of our past shows a long record of climatic swings between heat & cold and we are now nearing the end of that usual warm period, before the natural climate again swings towards a colder period ahead.

Whether the current climatic change has been "assisted" by human input, via additional & vast amounts of Carbon Dioxide & other Greenhouse Gases in still being debated by some, although the general concensus amongst scientists clearly says WE HAVE PUSHED THE CLIMATE CHANGE FURTHER & FASTER, than what may have otherwise happened.

The upshot is, it will also make our agriculture less productive, which means it will be more difficult to support the current population! 

In short, this time is different!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #685 - Jun 20th, 2012 at 8:14pm
 
Economy expected to slow, survey shows


AUSTRALIA'S economic growth is expected to come to a virtual halt in the second half of 2012, a private sector survey shows.

The Westpac-Melbourne Institute Leading Index, which indicates the likely pace of economic activity three to nine months into the future, was at 0.2 per cent in April, well below its long-term average of 2.6 per cent.

"The Leading Index is pointing to a sharp slowdown over the second half of this year," Westpac Senior Economist Matthew Hassan said in a statement today.

Link -
http://www.news.com.au/business/markets/economy-expected-to-slow-survey-shows/st...
========================
This is what is expected now, can you imagine what would happen, IF/WHEN AUS-terity starts?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #686 - Jun 22nd, 2012 at 9:54am
 
Global Data Demolishes the Dow


With hopes of QE3 temporarily dashed following an uninspiring Fed statement yesterday, investors reacted to negative economic data in a much different fashion than last week. Rewind to one week ago, when markets rallied on the “pro QE3” economic data, which ranged from spiking jobless claims to skyrocketing Spanish borrowing costs.

But with the widely-anticipated Fed statement behind us, similar economic data that came out today, which indicated contracting economic activity, wasn’t met with as warm a welcome.

The damage? A 250-point tumble for the Dow Jones Industrial Average (INDEX: ^DJI  ) , making it the second worst trading day of the year, and one where only two of thirty Dow components closed higher on the day.

Iinvestors may not have to wait too long for another Fed-induced rally on abysmal economic data. All it takes is a quick trip to the Federal Reserve website to see that the FOMC meets again at the end of next month, a full two weeks quicker than the previous layoff we just experienced.

So, while there will likely be some bumps in the short-term, as investors digest economic data without the mind-bending effects of QE3-mania, it’s important to remember that the Fed plans to “maintain a highly accommodative stance for monetary policy” going forward. And if history has taught us anything,  it’s “don’t fight the Fed.”

Link -
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/06/21/global-data-demolishes-the-dow....
===============================
As I"ve said previously, "this time is different"!

So, on this ocassion, instead of going with the market saying of “don’t fight the Fed”, it may be better to go with “don’t fight the absolute basics”, which of course are -
1) Demographics
2) Energy
3) Climate

All of which is not to say that there will still be ups, as well as downs, but only day traders will have any chance of profiting in these markets, the old method of investing & leave it there, is now guaranteed to be a loser !

Todays DOW Chart -

http://chart.finance.yahoo.com/z?s=%5eDJI&t=1d&q=&l=&z=l&a=v&p=s&lang=en-AU&regi...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #687 - Jun 22nd, 2012 at 1:23pm
 
Moody's downgrades Goldman, Citigroup


The health of 15 of the world's largest financial institutions has been called into serious question, as Moody's downgraded their credit ratings, citing exposure to Europe's economic woes.

Some of the biggest names in banking, including Goldman Sachs, Barclays, Citigroup, HSBC and Deutsche Bank, saw their ratings slashed, spelling increased scrutiny from markets and potentially higher borrowing costs.

Royal Bank of Scotland, Bank of America Corp, Royal Bank of Canada, Societe Generale and UBS were also targeted.

Moody’s global banking managing director Greg Bauer said all of the banks targeted by the move have significant exposure to continuing volatility and risk on global markets.

"However, they also engage in other, often market leading business activities that are central to Moody’s assessment of their credit profiles," he said.

"These activities can provide important ‘shock absorbers’ that mitigate the potential volatility of capital markets operations, but they also present unique risks and challenges."

Among the banks, Credit Suisse was hit with the harshest downgrade. The lender's rating was cut three levels from Aa1 to A1.

JPMorgan's long-term senior debt rating has been cut to A2 from Aa3 and given a negative outlook.

Morgan Stanley was cut from A2 to Baa1, with a negative outlook.

Bank of America was moved down one notch from Baa1 to Baa2, putting the Charlotte bank's long-term debt rating just two notches above "junk" status.

It's the latest in a series of downgrades from the three primary ratings agencies over the last year and a reflection of the bank's volatile earnings and an increasingly uncertain global market.

The downgrades have been anticipated since Moody's announced it would put banks with global capital markets exposure under review in February, as the ratings agency wanted to take another look at them amid market volatility.

Since then, the capital market outlook has only worsened. The US has turned in disappointing jobs numbers, Spain's sovereign bond yields and unemployment have worsened and China's growth has slowed.

Ratings agency downgrades have lost some of their importance since the financial crisis, when a number of investments given top ratings were found to be full of defective assets, said Ken Thomas, a Miami-based an independent bank analyst and economist.

"It will have some effects here and there, but how the markets will take it, how the average person in the street will take it, it's really not going to matter," Thomas said.

The bank's primary rating outlook remains negative, however, since its position is still influenced by the understanding that the government might prop up the bank if needed.

Moody's recognizes, though, that the government guarantee is becoming less certain.

Downgrades generally mean that a company's borrowing cost will be higher, though the current market's low rates mean the banks' cost of funding won't become inordinate.

Link -
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/15-global-banks-downgraded-by...
==============================
IMHO & whilst Banks, other Financial institutions, Politicians & TPTB, all worldwide, all share some blame for what is happening & will continue to happen, the Ratings Agencies should also shoulder some responsibility, for their "lack of clarity" or "worse"!

PS - We, the general Public, are also far from blameless, but we have also had to endure a great deal of "misdirection"!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #688 - Jun 23rd, 2012 at 11:01am
 
Following is a share price chart, which would be troubling Qantas investors, management & OZ Political party's!

https://chartbigchart.gtm.idmanagedsolutions.com/custom/etrade-australia/chart.a...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bobbythefap1
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain
Re: For the Record
Reply #689 - Jun 23rd, 2012 at 11:20am
 
perceptions_now wrote on Jun 23rd, 2012 at 11:01am:
Following is a share price chart, which would be troubling Qantas investors, management & OZ Political party's!

https://chartbigchart.gtm.idmanagedsolutions.com/custom/etrade-australia/chart.a...

Good news for Richard Branson
Back to top
 

A day without sunshine is like night.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 ... 117
Send Topic Print