Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 117
Send Topic Print
For the Record (Read 219281 times)
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #45 - Aug 7th, 2010 at 4:09pm
 
A Very Graphic Guide to the Dismal State of U.S. Jobs


...

...

...

...

...

...

Link -
http://seekingalpha.com/article/218787-a-very-graphic-guide-to-the-dismal-state-...
==========
A picture is worth a thousand words, enough said!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: For the Record
Reply #46 - Aug 7th, 2010 at 4:33pm
 
WOW!!!!!!

They should get the Australian Bureau of Statistics to get their figures, they'd look so much better.
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #47 - Aug 8th, 2010 at 11:45am
 
Employment-Population Ratio, Part Time Workers, Unemployed over 26 Weeks


Percent Job Losses During Recessions, aligned at Bottom

Longer. Deeper. And flat at the bottom. Unfortunately that describes the 2007 employment recession.


...

This graph shows the job losses from the start of the employment recession, in percentage terms - this time aligned at the bottom of the recession (Both the 1991 and 2001 recessions were flat at the bottom, so the choice was a little arbitrary).

The dotted line shows the impact of Census hiring. In July, there were 196,000 temporary 2010 Census workers on the payroll. The number of Census workers will continue to decline - and the gap between the solid and dashed red lines will be gone in a few months.

...

Employment-Population Ratio
The Employment-Population ratio decreased to 58.4% in July from 58.5% in June. This had been increasing after plunging since the start of the recession, and the recovery in the Employment-Population ratio was considered a good sign - but the ratio has now decreased for three consecutive months.

This graph shows the employment-population ratio; this is the ratio of employed Americans to the adult population.

Note: the graph doesn't start at zero to better show the change.

The Labor Force Participation Rate decreased to 64.6% from 64.7% in June. This is the percentage of the working age population in the labor force. This decline is very disappointing, and the rate is well below the 66% to 67% rate that was normal over the last 20 years.

The reason the unemployment rate was steady at 9.5% was because people left the workforce - and that is not good news. As the employment picture improves, people will return to the labor force, and that will put upward pressure on the unemployment rate.
Link -
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/08/employment-population-ratio-part-time....
=============
For those who think this Economic slowdown is no different to the usual business cycle, look at these 2 charts on USA Unemployment & Employment and think again!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #48 - Aug 9th, 2010 at 8:21pm
 
Gwynne Dyer: Russian response to wildfires gives an early glimpse of climate change impact


It cannot be proved that the wildfires now devastating western Russia are evidence of global warming. Once-in-a-century extreme weather events happen, on average, once a century. But the Russian response is precisely what you would expect when global warming really starts to bite: Moscow has just banned all grain exports for the rest of this year.

At least 20 percent of Russia’s wheat crop has already been destroyed by the drought, the extreme heat—circa 40 º C for several weeks now—and the wildfires. The export ban is needed, explained Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, because “we shouldn’t allow domestic prices in Russia to rise, we need to preserve our cattle and build up supplies for next year”. If anybody starves, it won’t be Russians.

That’s a reasonable position for a Russian leader to take, but it does mean that some people will starve elsewhere. Russia is the world’s fourth-largest grain exporter, and anticipated shortages in the international grain market had already driven the price of wheat up by more than 80 percent since early June. When Putin announced the export ban, it immediately jumped by another eight percent.

Two problems are going to converge and merge in the next 10 or 15 years, with dramatic results. One is the fact that global grain production, which kept up with population growth from the 1950s to the 1990s, is no longer doing so. It may even have flatlined in the past decade, although large annual variations make that uncertain. Whereas the world’s population is still growing.

We now have a smaller grain reserve globally than a prudent civilization in Mesopotamia or Egypt would have aimed for 3,000 years ago. Demand is growing not just because there are more people, but because there are more people rich enough to put more meat into their diet. So things are very tight even before climate change hits hard.

The second problem is, of course, global warming. The rule of thumb is that with every one-degree C rise in average global temperature, we lose 10 percent of global food production. In some places, the crops will be damaged by drought; in others by much hotter temperatures. Or, as in Russia’s case today, by both.

So food production will be heading down as demand continues to increase, and something has to give.
What will probably happen is that the amount of internationally traded grain will dwindle as countries ban exports and keep their supplies for themselves. That will mean that a country can no longer buy its way out of trouble when it has a local crop failure: there will not be enough exported grain for sale.

This is the vision of the future that has the soldiers and security experts worried: a world where access to enough food becomes a big political and strategic issue even for developed countries that do not have big surpluses at home. It would be a very ugly world indeed, teeming with climate refugees and failed states and interstate conflicts over water (which is just food at one remove).

What is happening in Russia now, and its impacts elsewhere, give us an early glimpse of what that world will be like. And although nobody can say for certain that the current disaster there is due to climate change, it certainly could be.

Late last year, Britain’s Hadley Centre for Climate Change produced a world map showing how different countries will be affected by the rise in average global temperature over the next 50 years. The European countries that the Hadley map predicts will be among the hardest hit—Greece, Spain, and Russia—are precisely the ones have suffered most from extreme heat, runaway forest fires, and wildfires in the past few years.

The main impact of global warming on human beings will be on the food supply, and eating is a non-negotiable activity. Today Russia, tomorrow the world.
Link -
http://www.straight.com/article-337565/vancouver/gwynne-dyer-russian-response-wildfires-gives-early-glimpse-climate-change-impact
=============
There are a couple of things to remember, when talking about Peak Energy & Peak Food -
1) Oil is heavily involved in agriculature in many areas, including the Fertiliser/Chemicals used, transport of the produce around the world and many other issues related to food.
2) The requirement for Growth in Food is linked to the Growth of Populations, which are already slowing and will  start to actually decline in around 2030-2040.
3) Climate Change is already impacting Food production, as indicated by such issues as the current Russian example & the Murray-Darling basin.

Exactly when Food will Peak may not yet be certain, but clearly it has already started to outstrip inflation, next comes shortages!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: For the Record
Reply #49 - Aug 10th, 2010 at 7:41am
 
I remember seeing an interview with George Negus and some economic expert (a genuine expert this time) and George asked him what the big business of the future would be, and he said agriculture.

We should be growing and storing food like we have never done before. If we don't do it now, I mean right now, it will be too late.

We have the land, we have the opportunity, we have what is needed to do it, but we don't, why not?

I also saw a documentary about a person who had the know-how and the proven ability to grow crops in the desert. He went to the middle east to do it for them. We always seem to let these smart people slip through our fingers. We need a 'futures' leader who can look 40 or 50 years ahead, not just for the term of their leadership.
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #50 - Aug 10th, 2010 at 9:38am
 
Quote:
We need a 'futures' leader who can look 40 or 50 years ahead, not just for the term of their leadership.


Whitlam, still villified by moronic Liberal supporters, was denied supply by Malcolm Fraser's Liberal opposition, because of the "Loans Affair".
The Loans Affair was simply seeking to access a loan from the Arab world, which was flooded with oil money, and offering way cheaper interest than traditional lenders.

The money was for, developing the WA north western region, and building twin pipelines to carry the abundant clean water, and natural gas from the region, to supply the whole Eastern seaboard of Australia with, cheap, clean fuel, and abundant water supplies, which would have sparked major investment in Industry around our whole country.

The fact that this Nation Building opportunity was lost, is down to the short sighted ignorance of the Liberal Party, and it's moronic supporters who think that we can just keep digging up the country and shipping it overseas a boatload at a time for ever.

Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #51 - Aug 10th, 2010 at 11:40am
 
mozzaok wrote on Aug 10th, 2010 at 9:38am:
Quote:
Pansi1951
We need a 'futures' leader who can look 40 or 50 years ahead, not just for the term of their leadership.


Whitlam, still villified by moronic Liberal supporters, was denied supply by Malcolm Fraser's Liberal opposition, because of the "Loans Affair".

The money was for, developing the WA north western region, and building twin pipelines to carry the abundant clean water, and natural gas from the region, to supply the whole Eastern seaboard of Australia with, cheap, clean fuel, and abundant water supplies, which would have sparked major investment in Industry around our whole country.


Having been to the Kununurra/Lake Argyle area earlier this year, it did remind me of the enormous opportunity that was lost to Australia and WA in particular, because the Lake Arglye water was never piped East & South.

If this had been done around the time that the Dam was built &/or that the Gas pipelines were put in, the then costs would now be regarded as minor.

To provide an idea of the amount of freash water on "tap", so to speak, it would range between 10 to 25 times the size of Sydney Habour, depending on how wet the rainy season gets.

Given the likely future directions of Climate Change in Australia and the apparent drying of southern Australia, sending the Lake Argyle water to Southern & Eastern Australia, would have been one of THE WORLDS GREATEST EVER INVESTMENTS and made our future much more sustainable!

It has been said that, "we get the Politicians that we deserve", whether that is true only time will tell, but it is certainly true that there are many, inside & outside of Politics, who fail to look past two words, ME & NOW!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #52 - Aug 11th, 2010 at 12:59pm
 
Fed Will Keep Holdings Stable in Bid to Boost Growth (Update1)


Aug. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve officials made their first attempt to bolster the economy in more than a year, saying they will maintain their holdings of securities to stop money from draining out of the financial system.

The central bank will reinvest principal payments on mortgage assets it holds into long-term Treasuries after judging that “the pace of economic recovery is likely to be more modest in the near term than had been anticipated,” the Federal Open Market Committee said in a statement after meeting today in Washington.

‘Stronger Action’
The central bank is “willing to take stronger action if it needs to,”
J. Alfred Broaddus, president of the Richmond Fed from 1993 to 2004, said in an interview on Bloomberg Television’s “Street Smart” with Carol Massar and Matt Miller. Investors will expect a resumption of large-scale asset purchases if data “remain on the soft side,” Dean Maki, chief U.S. economist at Barclays Capital Inc. in New York, said on the program.

The Fed left the overnight interbank lending rate target in a range of zero to 0.25 percent, where it’s been since December 2008. High unemployment, low inflation and stable price expectations “are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period,” the Fed said, repeating language from every policy meeting since March 2009.

Recovery Slows
“The pace of recovery in output and employment has slowed in recent months,” the FOMC said. The Fed will “continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments and will employ its policy tools as necessary to promote economic recovery and price stability.”

Job Market
The weak job market has inhibited growth in consumer spending, which accounts for about 70 percent of the economy. Such expenditures rose at a 1.6 percent pace last quarter, down from a 1.9 percent rate in the previous three months that was smaller than previously estimated.
Link -
http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aE6i3XP5S5OQ&pos=1
=============
In short, the US Fed Reserve Bank is trying to monetorise US Debt, by using worthless sub-prime mortgage Debt, to buy long term US Treasuries.

They (neither the FED Reserve, nor US Federal government) can not take any stronger, because they do not have any weapons of mass destruction, which would be of sufficient magnitude to offset the decline of the US & Global Economy. They only have weapons of mass distraction?

The reason they are taking this action now is that they know the US Economy is again starting to slow, as the stimulus programs wear off and they are again trying to buy time.

However, as Jeff Goldblum said in Indepence Day, "Times up."

This decline is brought about because of the de-leveraging of both the Financial & Consumer sectors & it will continue to do so for many years, due to -
1) An Aging US & Global Population, which is causing Demand to slow, in many areas of the US & Global Economy.

2) Peak Oil arrived in 2005 and that is causing cost pressures to build in the US & Global Economy, which will result in continual re-lapses in the REAL US & Global Economy.
Every time the Energy to GDP ratio starts to go too high, because of perceived & real Energy scarcity, the Economy will collapse again.

3) The Total US, Australian & Global Population growth is slowing and will eventually go into actual decline in around 20-30 years, again causing the Demand Growth rate in many areas of the Global Economy to slow, before finally both the Total Population & Economy go into permanent decline.

4) Debt to GDP ratios are already far to high in many countries, for stimulus packages to be implemented again, to assist in smoothing out the Economic lumps and most Politicians & Economists are still living in a past era, but the OLD FIXES WILL NO LONGER WORK IN THIS NEW PARADIGM.

5) One of the old fixes that will no longer work is simply boosting the Population again, by having another Baby Boom.
This is not possible, because it would -
a) Make our dwindling Energy & other Essential Resources run out quicker and further deprive future generations of their fair chance at life.
b) Build the pressures even quicker, on GHG emissions, which are directly related to size of the Global Population & the Industrial/Defense complex that goes with Population size.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #53 - Aug 11th, 2010 at 3:02pm
 
China: The Mother of All Bubbles


In the latest issue of The Casey Report, Bud Conrad does a fantastic job analyzing the truth about Asia. Japan is a ticking demographic time bomb. The Chinese government has created the mother of all bubbles and when it pops, it will be felt around the world. The China miracle is not really a miracle. It is a debt financed bubble. Sound familiar?

The chart below shows that compared to the real estate bubble in Japan during the late 1980s and the current bubble in China, the US housing bubble looks like a tiny speed bump. The US has 20% to 30% more downside to go. For those looking for a housing recovery, I’d like to point out that Japan’s housing market has fallen for 20 years with no recovery. I wonder if the National Association of Realtors will be running an advertisement campaign in 2025 telling us it is the best time to buy.


Take a gander at home prices in China. Since the 2008 financial crisis, the Chinese housing market has skyrocketed 60%.
There are now 65 million vacant housing units.
The question is no longer whether there is a Chinese housing bubble, but when will it pop. There is one thing that bubbles ALWAYS do. And that is POP.

...

The price of land in and around Beijing has gone up by a factor of 9 in the last few years. Delusion isn’t just for Americans anymore. These two charts should be placed next to the word “bubble” in the dictionary. This will surely end in tears for anyone who has bought a house in China in the last two years.

...

Link -
http://seekingalpha.com/article/219542-china-the-mother-of-all-bubbles?source=em...
==========
If there are now 65 Million vacant housing units
in china and we assume only 3 people per housing unit, then

that would be enough to house the population of another 13 Beijings
, with an average of around 15 Million in each city!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: For the Record
Reply #54 - Aug 11th, 2010 at 5:20pm
 
<<If there are now 65 Million vacant housing units in china and we assume only 3 people per housing unit, then >>

................................................................................
....................

We can all go and live in China, if we want to fix our housing shortage.

We had trouble building one for the indigenous community. Maybe we can learn something.

They built like mad to inflate their GDP.  It's the great myth of China and the West are falling for it. China will save us all, maybe not.
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #55 - Aug 11th, 2010 at 5:31pm
 
Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Aug 11th, 2010 at 5:20pm:
<<If there are now 65 Million vacant housing units in china and we assume only 3 people per housing unit, then >>

................................................................................
....................

We can all go and live in China, if we want to fix our housing shortage.

We had trouble building one for the indigenous community. Maybe we can learn something.

They built like mad to inflate their GDP.  It's the great myth of China and the West are falling for it. China will save us all, maybe not.


Well, Pansi, if WE ALL (22 Million Australians) GO TO CHINA, we would take up less than 2 of their spare 13 Beijing size cities, then they would only have just over another 11 to fill?

I know its a little tongue in cheek, but no, China won't save the world!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #56 - Aug 11th, 2010 at 11:53pm
 
The DOW is now down over 200 points in early trading, the PPT could get some more action?

Bloomberg Link -
http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=INDU:IND

PPT video -
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ex Dame Pansi
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 24168
Re: For the Record
Reply #57 - Aug 12th, 2010 at 6:36am
 
WOW!!!! I didn't even know there was that sort of criminal activity going on behind the scenes in the stock market.

A penny here, a penny there, at the end of the week just one billion dollars. Goldman Sachs et al thieving criminals.

We don't even know when the stock market crashes any more. It's all a big joke, but at least we get the last laugh, but they'll all get off scot free AGAIN.
Back to top
 

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #58 - Aug 12th, 2010 at 1:01pm
 
Martenson's Outlook: Inflation, Deflation, Stagflation


Chris Martenson was on tech ticker the other day and, when asked whether we’ll see in-flation or de-flation in the period ahead he replies with a resounding “Yes”.

Says Martenson:

The Continuous Commodity Index is absolutely screaming inflation at this point in time over the past eight or nine year timeframe, but, at the same time, we’re seeing houses decline in price, we’re seeing a number of other things – asset prices – move lower, which, I think is what the Fed is most concerned about at this point in time. So, I think we’re going to see both.
He’s also convinced that a double-dip recession is imminent.


Link -
http://seekingalpha.com/article/219816-martenson-s-outlook-inflation-deflation-s...
==========
Have a look at the Chris Martenson video on this link, he has a good grasp of the current situation.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #59 - Aug 12th, 2010 at 2:15pm
 
U.S. Is Bankrupt and We Don’t Even Know It: Laurence Kotlikoff


Aug. 11 (Bloomberg) -- Let’s get real. The U.S. is bankrupt. Neither spending more nor taxing less will help the country pay its bills.

What it can and must do is radically simplify its tax, health-care, retirement and financial systems, each of which is a complete mess. But this is the good news. It means they can each be redesigned to achieve their legitimate purposes at much lower cost and, in the process, revitalize the economy.

the IMF has effectively pronounced the U.S. bankrupt. Section 6 of the July 2010 Selected Issues Paper says: “The U.S. fiscal gap associated with today’s federal fiscal policy is huge for plausible discount rates.” It adds that “closing the fiscal gap requires a permanent annual fiscal adjustment equal to about 14 percent of U.S. GDP.”

Double Our Taxes
To put 14 percent of gross domestic product in perspective, current federal revenue totals 14.9 percent of GDP. So the IMF is saying that closing the U.S. fiscal gap, from the revenue side, requires, roughly speaking, an immediate and permanent doubling of our personal-income, corporate and federal taxes as well as the payroll levy set down in the Federal Insurance Contribution Act.

Such a tax hike would leave the U.S. running a surplus equal to 5 percent of GDP this year, rather than a 9 percent deficit. So the IMF is really saying the U.S. needs to run a huge surplus now and for many years to come to pay for the spending that is scheduled. It’s also saying the longer the country waits to make tough fiscal adjustments, the more painful they will be.

‘Unofficial’ Liabilities
Based on the CBO’s data, I calculate a fiscal gap of $202 trillion, which is more than 15 times the official debt. This gargantuan discrepancy between our “official” debt and our actual net indebtedness isn’t surprising. It reflects what economists call the labeling problem. Congress has been very careful over the years to label most of its liabilities “unofficial” to keep them off the books and far in the future.


How can the fiscal gap be so enormous?
Simple. We have 78 million baby boomers who, when fully retired, will collect benefits from Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid that, on average, exceed per-capita GDP. The annual costs of these entitlements will total about $4 trillion in today’s dollars. Yes, our economy will be bigger in 20 years, but not big enough to handle this size load year after year.

This is what happens when you run a massive Ponzi scheme for six decades straight, taking ever larger resources from the young and giving them to the old while promising the young their eventual turn at passing the generational buck.

And it will stop in a very nasty manner. The first possibility is massive benefit cuts visited on the baby boomers in retirement. The second is astronomical tax increases that leave the young with little incentive to work and save. And the third is the government simply printing vast quantities of money to cover its bills.

Worse Than Greece
Most likely we will see a combination of all three responses with dramatic increases in poverty, tax, interest rates and consumer prices. This is an awful, downhill road to follow, but it’s the one we are on.

Some doctrinaire Keynesian economists would say any stimulus over the next few years won’t affect our ability to deal with deficits in the long run.

This is wrong as a simple matter of arithmetic. The fiscal gap is the government’s credit-card bill and each year’s 14 percent of GDP is the interest on that bill. If it doesn’t pay this year’s interest, it will be added to the balance.

Demand-siders say forgoing this year’s 14 percent fiscal tightening, and spending even more, will pay for itself, in present value, by expanding the economy and tax revenue.

My reaction? Get real, or go hang out with equally deluded supply-siders. Our country is broke and can no longer afford no- pain, all-gain “solutions.”
Link -
http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aiFjnanrDWVk
============
The USA  and indeed the rest of the world, including Australia, is in the same boat.

It is called the Titanic, it has been holed and we are taking in lots of water.

Let no one tell you that we don't really have a problem or that it is only a minor issue.

This ship, our current Economic & Political way of life, is shifting from one paradigm to another very different paradigm and there will be some substantial changes ahead.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 117
Send Topic Print