Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 117
Send Topic Print
For the Record (Read 219340 times)
lerche007
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20
Re: For the Record
Reply #105 - Sep 9th, 2010 at 2:05am
 
Hi Perceptions,

U seem to have an issue with world population decreasing,WHY?

I cant see it decreasing the world does a good job in breeding,and if we do fall in in depression as u say,what do people do when they have no money and no money for entertainment,no jobs,and plenty of time,just BORED they populate,see 1930's depression huge families compared with today.
More HYPE?  Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #106 - Sep 9th, 2010 at 9:05am
 
lerche007 wrote on Sep 9th, 2010 at 2:05am:
Hi Perceptions,

U seem to have an issue with world population decreasing,WHY?

I cant see it decreasing the world does a good job in breeding,and if we do fall in in depression as u say,what do people do when they have no money and no money for entertainment,no jobs,and plenty of time,just BORED they populate,see 1930's depression huge families compared with today.More HYPE?  Wink


It is not just Population Decline, there is also the Aging Demographics of the Global Population, as well as a few other major considerations, such as Peak Energy & Climate Change.

That said, the issue is falling Demand!

Demand has already started to fall slightly, but as the Aging Boomer generation starts retiring enmass, Demand will decline further (as will productivity per capita), over the next 10-20 years, before the massive Boomer generation start to die enmass.

In concert with that, the Global Population Growth rate has already been slowing for over 40 years, it will continue to do so and within 20-30 years the falling Global Fertility rate will mix with the massive die-off of the Boomer generation, to produce an actual decline in the Global total Population, which will continue perhaps until the end of this century.

The combined effect of these two Population issues, will result in a massive decline in Demand for everything!

Peak De-leveraging!

And, NO, I think it is unlikely that a new Depression will not lead to a new baby boom, as Peak Energy & Climate Change will prevent that from happening.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lerche007
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20
Re: For the Record
Reply #107 - Sep 11th, 2010 at 9:36pm
 
Hi Perceptions,

It is not just Population Decline, there is also the Aging Demographics of the Global Population, as well as a few other major considerations, such as Peak Energy & Climate Change
................................................................................
..................
Why should the lack of oil prevent breeding,no oil heaters more cuddling LOL,besides what makes U think we won't have alternative to oil?
Climate change is a myth.
If U look back to 1930's ,ww1,ww2,en mass death that occurred to the population now....decreasing,no but maybe we have reached a point where this planet along how we humans exist we have reached the end of sensible sustainability.
................................................................................
....................
In concert with that, the Global Population Growth rate has already been slowing for over 40 years, it will continue to do so and within 20-30 years the falling Global Fertility rate will mix with the massive die-off of the Boomer generation, to produce an actual decline in the Global total Population, which will continue perhaps until the end of this century.
 ...............................................................................
.....................
I cant agree here if U think people retiring save money don't spend so not much help in to turnover of Economy I cant agree there,with U
there,
Quite the opposite,
When retire money comes in so do the YOUNGER family LOL!
Most old couples buy a new nice car and for cash no credit,they saved it. Younger just really lease,HP
Most reinvest some of the lump sums,young have none
Most trade wealth for health a boost for all involved hospitals surgeons,dentists,rest homes because they are getting old and broken and can afford it because they saved it! The young  Okay cant afford the time off nor the money!
Most sell up big old family homes, split some with the kids and buy smaller units close to HOSPITALS...The young are renting
Most old spend more on Restaurants,fetes,ole dances etc different to the pub granted but the oldies have the time and half rates but they have all time they want,different life styles.
And finally 6K plus funeral,death duties taxes etc the final spend up!
The young have no need to be concerned
And then its the will and the passing down of ASSETS to the much needed younger generation to spend.

U see the stats don't tell U the real story!    Cool
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #108 - Sep 11th, 2010 at 10:22pm
 
lerche007 wrote on Sep 11th, 2010 at 9:36pm:
Hi Perceptions,

It is not just Population Decline, there is also the Aging Demographics of the Global Population, as well as a few other major considerations, such as Peak Energy & Climate Change
................................................................................
..................

3) Why should the lack of oil prevent breeding,no oil heaters more cuddling LOL,besides what makes U think we won't have alternative to oil?
4) Climate change is a myth.
2) If U look back to 1930's ,ww1,ww2,en mass death that occurred to the population now
....decreasing,no but maybe we have reached a point where this planet along how we humans exist we have reached the end of sensible sustainability.
................................................................................
....................
In concert with that, the Global Population Growth rate has already been slowing for over 40 years, it will continue to do so and within 20-30 years the falling Global Fertility rate will mix with the massive die-off of the Boomer generation, to produce an actual decline in the Global total Population, which will continue perhaps until the end of this century.
 ...............................................................................
.....................
5) I cant agree here if U think people retiring save money don't spend so not much help in to turnover of Economy I cant agree there,with U
there,
Quite the opposite,
When retire money comes in so do the YOUNGER family LOL!
Most old couples buy a new nice car and for cash no credit,they saved it. Younger just really lease,HP
Most reinvest some of the lump sums,young have none
Most trade wealth for health a boost for all involved hospitals surgeons,dentists,rest homes because they are getting old and broken and can afford it because they saved it! The young  Okay cant afford the time off nor the money!
Most sell up big old family homes, split some with the kids and buy smaller units close to HOSPITALS...The young are renting
Most old spend more on Restaurants,fetes,ole dances etc different to the pub granted but the oldies have the time and half rates but they have all time they want,different life styles.

6) And finally 6K plus funeral,death duties taxes etc the final spend up!
8) The young have no need to be concerned
7) And then its the will and the passing down of ASSETS to the much needed younger generation to spend.


1) U see the stats don't tell U the real story!    Cool


1)  You are absolutely correct and the truth certainly won't come from Politicians,  nor Economists either!
Can I suggest that you have a look thru the following, as it may provide quite a few answers and probably & even more questions!

Coal and Oil: The Dark Monarchs of Global Energy: Understanding Supply and Extraction Patterns and their Importance for Future Production
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1276908003/all

Peak Oil, Carrying Capacity and Overshoot: Population, the Elephant in the Room - Revisited
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1276775027/all

2) The human cost of such an involuntary population rebalancing is, of course, horrific.
The peak excess death rate would happen in about 20 years, and would be about 200 million that year. To put this in perspective, WWII caused an excess death rate of only 10 million per year for only six years.

3) No, there will be alternatives, just not sufficient to sustain 7 Billion people!

4) Regrettably, NOT!

5) In this case the stats are pretty correct, Peak Earning & Spending years are 45-55 years old. After that, even in good time, people start saving for retirement and spending becomes more thrifty.

That said, these are not good times already in many places, particularly in the global Economic engine room, the USA.

Both Shares & Housing values have already declined significantly in the USA & Europe and these were the two primary areas that Baby Boomers were looking to fund their retirements.

It is suggested that, on current figures, 60% of US retirees do not have anywhere near enough to retire and they will attempt to stay in the workforce, which may prove very difficult!  

6) Yes, one of the few boom industries, Funerals!

7) Sorry, Boomers will have need of all they can find and more, very little assets will survive our friendly Boomers!

8) Yes, well, Good luck & watch the Debt & Taxes!



Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 13th, 2010 at 10:51am by perceptions_now »  
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #109 - Sep 13th, 2010 at 10:59am
 
Basel Compromise Means Higher Capital Ratios, Time to Comply


Sept. 13 (Bloomberg) -- Regulators looking to rein in the sort of risk-taking that caused the last financial crisis reached a compromise in Switzerland yesterday that more than doubles capital requirements for the world’s banks while giving them as long as eight years to comply.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision will require lenders to have common equity equal to at least 7 percent of assets, weighted according to their risk, including a 2.5 percent buffer to withstand future stress. Banks that fail to meet the buffer would be unable to pay dividends, though not forced to raise cash.

The definitions of what counts as capital and how risk is assessed have also been tightened. Some banks, such as Bank of America Corp. and Citigroup Inc., will be restricted in how much cash they can return to shareholders and pay their employees in years to come. Others, like Deutsche Bank AG, have already announced plans to raise additional capital.

“These are big changes in capital requirements,” said James Wiener, the New York-based head of finance and risk practice at Oliver Wyman, a management-consulting firm. “There’s a long period of adjustment, which takes off some pressure. But still, who wants to own a bank that can’t pay dividends for three years?”


The committee also gave banks until the end of 2017 to comply with the tighter definitions of capital and said that a new short-term liquidity standard wouldn’t be implemented until the beginning of 2015. While a separate long-term liquidity rule has been shelved under pressure from the banking industry, the short-term rule was expected to go into effect earlier. The two liquidity rules would require banks to hold enough cash and easily cashable assets to meet liabilities.

“Extending these deadlines -- liquidity, buffers, capital definitions -- should be a relief to banks,” said Frederick Cannon, an analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods in New York.
Link -
http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aotNZoy65uQU&pos=1
==============
Does the phrase, "let off the hook" ring a bell?

You may see that feeling reflected in today's market pricing.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #110 - Sep 15th, 2010 at 6:18pm
 
The Mighty US$

Last Report dated 23/08/2010

US$ Index (basket of Currencies:  @ 81.61 (Last Report - 82.98) (2010/06/04 - 87.85)

http://www.goldseek.com/quotes/charts/usdollar/usdollarindex24hour.php

Euro - US$: @ 1.2998 (Last Report - 1.2716) (2010/06/04 - 120.44)
AUD$ - US$: @ 0.9383 (Last Report - 0.8918) (2010/06/04 - 83.17)
AUD$ - GBP: @ 0.6046 (Last Report - 0.5726) (2010/06/04 - 57.04)
AUD$ - Euro:  @ 0.7219 (Last Report - 0.7013) (2010/06/04 - 69.06)
http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/currencies/fxc.html

Gold - @ US$1,271.60 (Last Report - US$1,231.40) (2010/06/04 - $1,207.80)
Oil -  @ US$76.18 (Last Report - US$74.17)  (2010/06/04 - $72.59)

DOW - 10,526 - (Down 18 @ Tuesday close) (Last Report - 10,214)  (2010/06/04 - 10,255)
All Ords -  4,703 (Up 34 @ Monday close) (Last Report - 4,460) (2010/06/04 - 4472)
http://www.bloomberg.com/?b=0

Last 5 years DOW -
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=%5EDJI#chart3:symbol=

THERE was movement at the FED, for the word had passed around, That the US$ was an old Regret and its value had long since passed away
==================

The VOLATILITY continues!

The big winner recently is the Australian $, which has gained against everything, but particularly the US$, which has gone into decline!

Share markets have picked up again, recently, but are still in range trading. I expect that shares will start to re-lapse shortly, in the later part of September and on into October.

Oil has also risen, in line with the lower US$.

And Gold continues its run of higher, highs!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #111 - Sep 16th, 2010 at 1:06pm
 
Record Long-Term Unemployment Means No Consumer Recovery


When personal consumption drives 70% of U.S. GDP, you don’t need the consumer to “die” to create a problem. You just need a sustained trend of hunkering down and cutting back.


This non-linear dynamic also applies to overinflated expectations (and accompanying valuations). When a number comes in below trend, it doesn’t have to be a goose egg to court disaster. Similarly, a reworking of the U.S. GDP mix to reflect permanently reduced consumption levels — Americans spending less money on “stuff” — could constitute a major paradigm shift.

Getting back to consumers: Why are we likely to see a sustained trend of “hunkering down and cutting back,” besides the reality of a multi-decade spend-it-all trend reversal, via balance sheet recession in which debt-levels have mounted and home-based savings have been vaporized?

Because, to paraphrase Bruce Springsteen, “Foreman says these jobs are goin’, boys, and they ain’t comin’ back.”
...

First, headline unemployment. As the chart shows, we’ve actually been here before — headline unemployment was (briefly) worse in 1982. Keep in mind, though, that the ‘82 spike only came after Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker had taken interest rates into the teens, inducing severe recession in order to “break the back of inflation,” and before the advent of globalization, outsourcing, and job competition on a worldwide scale.

But anyhow, moving on…
...

Average weeks unemployed is also off the charts. We have never been here before (in the past 62 years at least).
And one of the chilling and quite possibly structurally permanent reasons for this is because there is a large and growing gap between the productivity demands of business and the skillset of the average American worker.

In an environment of lean, mean efficiency where cost cuts dominate, Future hiring will mainly benefit the high-skilled: “There will be jobs,” says Lawrence Katz, a Harvard economist.

"The big question is what they are going to pay, and what kind of lives they will allow people to lead? This will be a big issue for how broad a middle class we are going to have." On one point there’s broad agreement: Of 8 million-plus jobs lost to the recession — in fields like manufacturing, real estate and financial services — many, perhaps most, aren’t coming back. In their place will be jobs in health care, information technology and statistical analysis. Some of the new positions will require complex skills or higher education. Others won’t — but they won’t pay very much, either.

To quote another hard-luck bard, “The times they are a changin’.”

Link -
http://seekingalpha.com/article/225077-record-long-term-unemployment-means-no-co...
==============
If the long term trend of both the total & average disposable income, which comprises 70% of an Economy, which is by far the largest (Globally), then how is a Consumer Recovery going happen?

In addition to that there are also a few other "minor' factors at play, such as Population Aging & Decline, Peak Energy & Massive Debt over-runs, so I don't see too many problems, things should be ok, by Christmas???

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #112 - Sep 18th, 2010 at 10:11am
 
Huge fish kill reported in Plaquemines Parish


Plaquemines Parish officials have asked state wildlife officials to investigate what they said is a massive fish kill at Bayou Chaland on the west side of the Mississippi River late Friday.
...

Photographs the parish distributed of the area shows an enormous amount of dead fish floating atop the water.
...

The fish kill was reported to the Louisiana Department of Wildlife & Fisheries and the cause has not yet been determined, the parish said. The fish were found in an area that has been impacted by the oil from the BP oil spill, the parish said.

The parish has also requested testing by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

"We can't continue to see these fish kills,'' Nungesser said in a news release. "We need some additional tests to find out why these fish are dying in large numbers. If it is low oxygen, we need to identify the cause."

A recent fish kill in nearby St. Bernard Parish was attributed to low oxygen levels in the water.
Link -
http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2010/09/huge_fish_kill_reported_in_pla.html
===========
It may prove interesting to follow this to the source of the problem.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #113 - Sep 18th, 2010 at 11:16am
 
US downturn won't harm Australia: expert


A US recession would not harm Australia nearly as much as it would have a decade ago because of our strong economic ties to Asia, an economist says.

Nomura Australia chief economist Stephen Roberts said that while a US downturn would still be felt around the world, Australia's high volumes of trade with firmly growing Asian nations would shield the domestic economy from the worst of a double-dip recession.

"Our direct export exposure to the US is about half what it was 10 years ago, while our direct exports to Asia are now well over 70 per cent of our total exports," Mr Roberts told AAP on Friday.

"In Asia we have some of the best fiscal positions in the world, there's plenty of policy capacity for Asia to boost its domestic spending and there has been a rebalancing in some of the biggest economies over there towards domestic demand.

"So it suggests a US downturn is still important, but of much less importance than it once was."

Mr Roberts comments came one day after Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) assistant governor (economics) Philip Lowe said the nation's economic future would be closely tied to China and India, and not the US.

"A decade or so ago, we spent a lot of time puzzling over why quarterly movements in Australian GDP were so highly correlated with quarterly movements in US GDP," Mr Lowe said in a speech in Sydney.

"We don't puzzle over this anymore - not because we solved the puzzle, but because the correlation has fallen.

"At the same time, the correlation between quarterly movements in Australian and Chinese GDP has steadily increased.

"Clearly what happens in the Australian economy is now more dependent upon what happens in China than has been the case at any time in our past."

Since the depths of the global financial crisis in late 2008 and early 2009, the economic performance of the US and Australia have diverged considerably.

The US jobless rate is currently near 10 per cent, more than double pre-crisis level.

By contrast, the official unemployment rate in Australia at 5.1 per cent, having peaked last year at 5.8 per cent.

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) lowered its benchmark cash rate to a 49-year-low rate at three per cent during the global financial crisis in an effort to stimulate the economy. It has since risen to 4.5 per cent as the economy improves.

The US Federal Reserve has kept its target cash rate at 0.25 per cent since December 2008 and is now considering quantitative easing whereby it increases the supply of money by increasing the excess reserves of the banking system.

However, another crippling US downturn is far from a certainty.
Link -
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-business/us-downturn-wont-harm-australia-ex...
============
A lot of what had been said was reasonable, until the last sentence.

Yes, the Australian Economic ties to the USA have lessened and our ties to China have strengthened.

However, the USA affect on China, most of S/E Asian & the world is still massive and the flow on effects to Australia will become apparent, if the USA re-enters an Economic slowdown.

The fact is that the USA has not escaped the GFC, it simply substituted falling GDP for rising Debt, on a temporary basis, in a Keynesian attempt to fix what can not be fixed.

Demand has started a long term decline, due to a number of factors, including Global Population Aging & subsequent actual decline, but also Peak Energy & Peak Debt.

The USA Economic decline WILL RESUME, it is only a matter of when, not if!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #114 - Sep 20th, 2010 at 4:57pm
 
Chris Martensons Crash Course


Anyone wanting to get a holistic handle on current & future events, including Financial issues, would do well to review all of the following!

Personally, I would view Chapter 19, for an overview, then go back to Chapter’s 1 thru 18, to get a full perspective. Finally, look at Chapter 20 to view, What should we do?

The following observation of Arthur Schopenhauer is included in these videos and is very apt!

All Truth passes through three stages.

First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

Chapter 1 – Three Beliefs


Chapter 2 – The three E’s


Chapter 3 – Exponential Growth


Chapter 4 – Compounding is the Problem


Chapter 5 – Growth Vs Prosperity


Chapter 6 – What is Money?


Chapter 7 – Money Creation


Chapter 8 – The Fed & Money Creation


Chapter 9 – A brief History of US Money


Chapter 10 - Inflation


Chapter 11 – How much is a TRILLION?


Chapter 12 – DEBT (1 of 2)


Chapter 12 – DEBT (2 of 2)


Chapter 13 – A National Failure to Save (1 of 2)


Chapter 13 – A National Failure to Save (2 of 2)



Chapter 14 – Assets & Demographics (1 of 2)


Chapter 14 – Assets & Demographics (2 of 2)



Chapter 15 – Bubbles (1 of 2)


Chapter 15 – Bubbles (2 of 2)



Chapter 16 – Fuzzy Numbers (1of 2)


Chapter 16 – Fuzzy Numbers (2of 2)



Chapter 17a – Peak Oil (1 of 2)


Chapter 17a – Peak Oil (2 of 2)



Chapter 17b – Energy Budgeting


Chapter 17c – Energy & the Economy


Chapter 18 – Environment Data (1 of 2)


Chapter 18 – Environment Data (2 of 2)


Chapter 19 – Future Shock


Chapter 20 – What should I do?
http://vodpod.com/watch/1239314-crash-course-chapter-20-what-should-i-do-chris-m...

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #115 - Sep 20th, 2010 at 9:35pm
 
Arithmetic, Population & Energy

Dr Albert Bartlett


(Part 1 of 8)


(Part 2 of 8)


(Part 3 of 8)


(Part 4 of 8)


(Part 5 of 8)


(Part 6 of 8)


(Part 7 of 8)


(Part 8 of 8)


The Bacteria comparison in Chapter 3, is apt!

But, there are a few other apt observations –
1) Technology Optimists will always be able to solve all of our Population Growth, Food, Energy & Resources problems?
2) Thinking is upsetting, it tells us things, we’d rather not know!
3) The chief source of problems, is solutions!
4) Facts do not cease to exist, simply because they are ignored1
5) The 1st Law of Sustainability, is that Population growth &/or growth in the rates of Consumption of Resources
CAN NOT BE SUSTAINED!
6) The greatest shortcoming of the human race, is OUR INABILITY TO UNDERSTAND THE EXPONENTIAL FUNCTION!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #116 - Sep 21st, 2010 at 7:41pm
 
Worst Over in Global Poll Pointing to Reduced Market Returns


Sept. 21 (Bloomberg) -- Three out of five global investors say the world economy has weathered the financial crisis and has stabilized two years after the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

Few believe the economy is recovering, with only one in six of those surveyed describing it as expanding, according to a global quarterly poll of 1,408 investors, analysts and traders who are Bloomberg subscribers. Forty-one percent aren’t convinced the financial situation is stable and say further turbulence is likely.

“When taken as a whole, the world has stabilized,” says Uzi Zimmerman, a respondent to the Bloomberg Global Poll and managing member of Ventura Capital Management, a hedge fund in the Los Angeles area. “The emerging markets of Asia and Latin America are providing support to the global economic malaise.”

There are still danger spots, including the threat of government defaults, respondents say. Over the last three months, the percentage of those who say it’s likely Ireland will default more than doubled to 37 percent, according to the poll, conducted on Sept. 16-17. Still, a majority see this as unlikely.

Investors are responding to the economic environment by managing their money conservatively, according to the poll, which has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.6 percentage points. More than 40 percent are still hunkering down, while one in three are taking more risks. The rest say they are getting back to normal. Those percentages were little changed from the last poll in June.

‘Much More Diversified’

“In the absence of clarity on numerous issues, we are much more diversified,” says Buddie C. Ballard Jr., a principal in Alpha Capital Management in Austin, Texas. “We’ve increased our exposure into more asset classes with smaller position sizes and tactically apply stops to those positions” to limit losses.

Europe is seen as a weak link in the world economy. More than three-quarters of those surveyed see a risk that the eurozone may dissolve eventually, and more than 20 percent of those describe such a threat as looming. That’s a more pessimistic take than in June, when a majority said the currency union would remain intact.

European investors are the most optimistic about the chances of avoiding a breakup of the eurozone; U.S. investors the least.

Shunning the Debt
Greece is still seen as the country most likely to default on its debt, with just over two-thirds of investors surveyed seeing that as probable. That’s down from the 73 percent who said they felt that way in June.

Bonds Worst Investment
Government bonds are seen as the worst investment for the coming year. Almost half of those polled said they felt that way, up from 36 percent in June.

Real estate also fared poorly in the poll, with one in four investors saying that would be the asset class with the worst return in the coming year.
Link-
http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=at9lQw9ZV6yQ&pos=1
============
In a PIIGS eye!

The worst is far from over!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #117 - Sep 22nd, 2010 at 4:34pm
 
The Mighty US$

Last Report dated 15/09/2010

US$ Index (basket of Currencies:  @ 80.17 (Last Report - 81.61) (2010/06/04 - 87.85)

http://www.goldseek.com/quotes/charts/usdollar/usdollarindex24hour.php

Euro - US$: @ 1.3291 (Last Report - 1.2998) (2010/06/04 - 120.44)
AUD$ - US$: @ 0.9560 (Last Report - 0.9383) (2010/06/04 - 83.17)
AUD$ - GBP: @ 0.6099 (Last Report - 0.6046) (2010/06/04 - 57.04)
AUD$ - Euro:  @ 0.7192 (Last Report - 0.7219) (2010/06/04 - 69.06)
http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/currencies/fxc.html

Gold - @ US$1,291.70 (Last Report - US$1,231.40) (2010/06/04 - $1,207.80)
Oil -  @ US$75.23 (Last Report - US$76.18)  (2010/06/04 - $72.59)

DOW - 10,761 - (Up 7 @ Tuesday close) (Last Report - 10,526)  (2010/06/04 - 10,255)
All Ords -  4,675 (Up 10 @ Wednesday close) (Last Report - 4,703) (2010/06/04 - 4472)
http://www.bloomberg.com/?b=0

Last 5 years DOW -
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=%5EDJI#chart3:symbol=

THERE was movement at the FED, for the word had passed around, That the US$ was an old Regret and its value had long since passed away
==================

The VOLATILITY continues!

The Australian $ continues to rise and the US$ continues to decline!
Long term US$ chart (2001-2010)
http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/US/M

Share markets have continued to pick up, as we approach crunch time.

Interestingly, Oil has dipped slightly, despite the lower US$.

And Gold continues its run of higher, highs! Today it is up over $17, as it approaches $1,300.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #118 - Sep 24th, 2010 at 8:07pm
 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Record
Reply #119 - Sep 25th, 2010 at 8:45pm
 
Wayne Swan on Final Budget Outcome 2009-10


The Final Budget Outcome for 2009-10 shows Australia's budget is in far better condition than the budgets of other comparable nations, putting us in a strong position to deliver a surplus in 2012-13.

The outcome for 2009-10 shows a small fiscal improvement from the estimate at the May Budget, but also highlights the fiscal consequences of the global recession.

The Budget felt the full force of the global financial crisis in 2009-10, with revenues downgraded by almost $50 billion from its pre-crisis level, a loss of almost one-sixth of forecast tax receipts.

While Australia avoided recession and the large-scale job losses and business closures that occurred elsewhere in the world, the sharp falls in global commodity prices and business profits that accompanied the global recession had a big impact on revenues and the fiscal position.

The Australian Government general government sector recorded an underlying cash deficit of $54.8 billion (4.2 per cent of GDP) for 2009-10. This is an improvement of $2.3 billion compared to the estimate at the time of the 2010-11 Budget.

Australian Government net debt was $42.3 billion or 3.3 per cent of GDP in 2009-10. This is dramatically lower than the net debt position for the major advanced economies, which averaged a collective 70 per cent of GDP in 2009.

The Government remains committed to its strict spending limits and fiscal strategy, which will see us return the budget to surplus in 2012-13, comfortably ahead of any major advanced economy.
Link -
http://australia.to/2010/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4428:wayne...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 117
Send Topic Print