Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 25
th, 2010 at 2:22am:
that's a fundamental thing about leftardism that i can't understand.
they hate all rich people.
but all the rich people i know are the best people.
a country with NO rich people is terrible.
you really want to encourage rich people.
shampain socialist wrote on Jun 25
th, 2010 at 2:32am:
Plato, I believe, wrote that the fate of all democracies is class warfare. Too right! How does it happen - attitudes like the cynicism and jealousy of the politics of the left. The extreme version is communism - they simply take everything off you.
There is not much to understand about it, with respect - the left does not like people with money, they do not like the profit motive, they think people who operate in that system are shady. The source of public funding is taxation - nothing to do with other people having to make profits, which is somehow dirty - that's how they think, and that's how a lot of people in Australia think. It has quite a leftist perception in it's culture which it has inherited from times past.
Hey SS & SC!
Firstly, I just wanted to apologise if I get you mixed up from time to time - since neither of you have an avatar and your writing styles and attitudes are so similar that you could be clones...
As for the above 2 posts...this lefty notes that you both seem to be afflicted with the right wing disability of black/white syndrome - which manifests in narrow and absolute thinking, assuming and projecting...
Notably, you assume that all lefties 'hate' people who are 'rich' - when most lefties would really prefer less polarisation of income, wealth, opportunity and power...
As for the class warfare argument, our current under-regulated system is creating such high levels of polarisation, that we now face the escalation of the GFC...
Recessions inevitably come about when the SHAREHOLDER share of production increases exponentially relative to the WAGES share...
Problem is that workers are also consumers...and, in the short-term, the rich can lend money to their customers so that they can consume - but at some point the majority of the population, the worker-consumers, become so heavily-indebted to the uber rich that they cannot lay and the whole system collapses...
Ironically, it was the Conservatives in the UK who have implemented a suggestion I've been making for some time - to set a limit of remuneration so that the ratio of the highest income earner to the lowest cannot exceed 20:1.
They've done that for the public service in the UK - but there is no valid reason why this principle cannot be rolled out across the private sector too - given that the value of the personal efforts of anybody cannot be readily justified at more than 20 of anyone else...