shampain socialist wrote on Jun 25
th, 2010 at 12:16am:
we will see one day, for absolute certain, what the ordinary Australian workers you describe are like - they are not the inheritors of communistic cyncism, nor Party champagne socialists, they are ordinary decent people who don't like grasping, backstabbing party factions - and when they finally see this sort of philosophy in action, like today, they get "disturbed". These labor politicians will pay for this at the next election. Tony Abbott is a "straight shooter" at least, he is conservative, and will probably turn out to be pig-headed after a term or so, then they will be booted out as usual. But these people who have done this today will not be respected by the Australian electorate, you watch. It would be like being complicit to something wrong to support them.
That's all very lovely - but an electorate that chose Rudd-of-no-record to begin with, and then maintained an inexplicable level of approval of him for two years is not a very perceptive or astute electorate, in my opinion. Rudd was elected solely because he was not Howard. Beazley, even Crean, would have on in 2007.
ANd so now Gillard will win because she is not Rudd. People will be relieved that they will be allowed to think that the mistake was not theirs in chosing Labor in 2007 but in Rudd 'losing his way'. A very large number of people will vote in Gillard to save face in front of themselves.