What the f*ck does any of that have to do with anything?

Quote:


What's the purpose of this irrelevant tirade exactly? Are you saying that because White people did some bad things towards other peoples in the past, bad things I would remind you that all other societies and peoples have engaged in, that therefore they have no right to defend, preserve and have their own societies in a manner that they see fit?

Attitudes like yours are exactly what I'm talking about. If we weren't up to our ears with opinions like this, we would never have had to face this issue in the first place.

Quote:


Yeah, what's your point? I would agree with you partially on that. I am actually suggesting a REMEDY. We need to stop being so self-serving and short-sighted concerning this matter. I WANT THIS.

Equitist wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2010 at 3:37pm:



How come preening Westerners only ever tell other Westerners that they are reaping as they have sown?  Lazy, corrupt, murderous or thieving third worlders are never, ever, ever, ever told by the same preening Westerners that once in a while they, the tinted people, have reaped as they have sown.  Fancy that.

aikmann4 wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2010 at 3:49pm:


He says it's all your fault and mine.

imp - thy wants us people who have made advances in science, engineering, medicine, education to apologise to those who have not applied themselves positively.
thy wants us to give up all our assets, bend over and apologise while the useless overbreeding unproductive ne'erdowells shove it up us - WITH no lubricant.

personally, I ain't gonna do that.

Look, folks...I do realise, that what I'm saying is overly idealistic and unrealistic in the present global circumstances - but I remain hopeful that humanity will wake up to itself, before we unwittingly compete, fight and destroy each other and our precious life-giving environment, to the point of earning a collective Darwin Award, in the wanton and reckless pursuit of the intangible but almighty dollar!

Of course the bill will not pass this time. But do not be mistaken about how widespread the resentment is aganst Muslim special pleading.
A yahoo poll:
Should the burqa be banned in public?
Yes 83% 15908 votes
No 17% 3306 votes

Anyway, who of the liberated-minded is prepared to side with the muslim women's liberation movements? No one. The 'liberated-minded' ,  with nary an exception, are all paralised with PC. There is no Western feminist, social justice,  progressive group publicly and loudly siding with muslim women who do not want to be second class citizens, who do not want sharia law that enshrines the inferiority, do not want imams to determine their lives even when they live in the free and democratic west.

Who of you impeccably left-wing progressives will side with them? None of you, because you are all sh!tting yourselves in the face of mustachioed, bearded crazies - or else are far too busy preening and posing. You much rather side with the crazies, just to show how bloody inclusive and smacking non-judgemntal you are.

Phoney progressives  -aintcha sick of 'em?!?!

freediver wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2010 at 9:27pm:



No, I am siding with the women who do NOT want to have sharia imposed on them becuse they know on their own skin that they have the most to lose under sharia.

It is a twisted world where the 'progressives' and 'greens' are frantically looking for ways to justify the keeping of women coverd up, silenced and degraded, in the name of being - 'progressive' and 'inclusive'!!! Orwell did know the half of it, I tell you.

Soren wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2010 at 9:44pm:

inclusive?
ha, ha.
this whole Multicultural bs has to stop here.
i live in "ethnic central" - to quote the Burwood, NSW, Police - and the place is a mess.
j.