I do not wish to say much more on this. However, since I have already beome involved, there are a few comments that I think ought to be made...
IM(not-so)HO,
neither party can plead complete innocence in this unfortunate cybersaga. There has been extreme viciousness on all sides - and it has long gone past the stage, of me being able to objectively determine the chicken/s from the egg/s.
I personally believe that
all 3 are decent people, deep down - each with differently quirky senses of humour - but there has been a series of heated misunderstandings, which have repeatedly-singed the increasingly-fragile egos of all concerned. Over time, subtle hints from myself and others, have gone unheeded - and the territory battles and inter-personal attacks and have continued unabated.
BTW, I do
not believe that
any one of them should be singled out for banning - it would need to be all 3 or none. It would also be a shame because each obviously has something valuable to offer on the political front.
I also believe that
all 3 still deserve an equal and unfettered chance to make this right within this cyber community. So, I would hope that they could
each find the courgage to call a
public truce of sorts - and honour it wholeheartedly.
OK, that's my last 2c worth (hopefully). I'n not sure whether I should hold my breath, whilst I await restoration of my faith in humanity...
Cheers
Nem
I dont know if you're including me in "the three" you speak of but if you do dont bother, Iamawhatever knows he cant do here what he has at yahoo as its against this forums rules to post personel details.
As for the rest of it, I was pointing out that I believed Lisa has a fair case in her accusations against Iamthe whatever,
Iamwhatever does not bother me, I've dealt with much better stalkers than him.