mozzaok
Gold Member
   
Offline

OzPolitic
Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender:
|
Well in case you are serious, I will post a serious response. His strengths are an almost indefatiguable drive, which sees him consistently working very long days, up at 5:00 AM, still working at Midnight is a tough ask for any man, but he regularly does just that. He has a good sense of reading the electoral mood, and responds to that, which is what inspires the criticisms of being an insincere try hard, so this is both a positive, and a negative for him on many occasions.
He does seem to genuinely want to instigate meaningful change, as is indicated by tackling the health issue, which has been neglected by all governments, of all political persuasions since whitlam brought in medicare almost forty years ago. Some may question his motives on this, as being inspired by a desire for self-aggrandisement, rather than altruistic ideals for the common good, but that is really an unknown, and those who speculate too vigorously, one way or the other, merely betray their own prejudices.
He is often a good communicator. That being said, he can convey both his ideas, and his enthusiasm for his ideas very well, when he wants to, but on the flip side, few men have mastered a greater degree of political nonsense speak than Mr Rudd, and when he wishes to avoid or evade a topic he can rattle off meaningless babble in a seemingly endless stream.
So, ultimate he is a pretty typical modern day politician, and most of the major, and certainly the most venomous, criticisms of him are inspired from a position of political polarisation, that would evaporate quickly if he were on their side of politics, which he most easily could be.
While he no doubt holds personal moral positions, he seems to be the archetypal political pragmatist, and as such can flip flop on great moral questions as easily as a media driven public can.
|