Scientific fields are commonly divided into two major groups: natural sciences, which study natural phenomena (including biological life), and social sciences, which study human behavior and societies. These groupings are empirical sciences, which means the knowledge must be based on observable phenomena and capable of being tested for its validity by other researchers working under the same conditions.[3]
From;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ScienceAsking pointless questions repeatedly never seems to bore you it seems FD.
Rather than actually discuss meaningful aspects of a subject, instead you seem determined to concern yourself with quibbling over minutiae of terminolgy instead, in some petty attempt to gather imaginary points in some debate of logics that seems to exist in your imagination.
The whole point of the original post was to bring up for discussion the proposition that we, as evolving, thinking, people, may be able to better understand morals, and moral questions, and in doing that improve the experience of all people.
That seems like a decent enough objective to me, and the fact that some people instead choose to focus on some vague concept of protecting religious organisations from losing total authority over the subject of morality, seems small minded in the extreme.
Forum
Pages: 
