Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Watson vs Mobil (Read 705 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53404
At my desk.
Watson vs Mobil
Feb 7th, 2010 at 7:38pm
 
Just in case anyone still thinks that scientists were on the bandwagon for cynical reasons, and that denialism puts their job at risk:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Watson_%28scientist%29

Andrew Revkin writing for the New York Times described Watson as an "outspoken advocate of the idea that human actions - mainly burning coal and oil - are contributing to global warming and must be changed to avert environmental upheavals."[3]

In April 2002 the United States pressed for and won his replacement by Rajendra Pachauri as IPCC chair. According to New Scientist, "The oil industry seems to be behind the move." The industry campaign to oust Watson had begun days after George W. Bush's inauguration in January 2001, with a memo to the White House from Randy Randol of oil giant ExxonMobil asking "Can Watson be replaced now at the request of the US?"[4]
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Watson vs Mobil
Reply #1 - Feb 7th, 2010 at 8:39pm
 
What are you struggling to say?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Watson vs Mobil
Reply #2 - Feb 8th, 2010 at 4:00pm
 
Somehow that doesn't surprise me if it were true, but it is from Wikipedia.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print