An Indian stabbed two other Indians, thats ok, its not a racist attack, did that make the Indian news or the fool who set himself on fire for insurance, did that make the Indian news and not to mention the hit and run murderer, still on the run in India, take a look in your own back yard India, oh, and your food sucks.

Which undesirable social conditions do you mean, Imperium?

The weddings, the picnics, family outings at the beach?

How come?

I'm sorry Karnal for resorting to posting a video, but I believe this short speech (Yes, Jared Taylor again.. my apologies) eloquently explains the latter aspect of my previous post more succinctly than my verbose ass possibly could.




His words are to me, sensible and poignant. I would hope you could understand where I am coming from more by listening to this.

Thanks Karnal. I have a question by the way, are you of Indian descent? Nothing personal; I'm curious actually.

Imperium, why are people that feel differently to you 'browbeaten'? Did you stop to think that some people just aren't as shallow as yourself?

Annie Anthrax wrote on Feb 17^th, 2010 at 4:22pm:


Because for many whites, the reason why they assent to various things is because of inculcation and browbeating. Whatever they profess to espouse is incongruous with their actual activities, whatever they say freely in private kept suppressed, out of genuine fear for the very serious consequences, in public. This is the reality of an all-encompassing societal ethos with utopian designs like multiculturalism-- it depends upon the complete and unwavering participation of those who operate under it; and even if it does not have any success, like Marxism, it seeks to make its population pretend that everything is okay or mentally incapable of perceiving what is plain to see.

Yes, while its most strongest advocates do genuinely believe, many of these people (I am not suggesting you, don't worry) are still caught in sort of a mental trap, like the followers of a religion. By mental trap I am not saying that this means "if you believe in multiculturalism you're trapped and need to be enlightened with my way of thinking"-- this would suggest a mental trap of my own, I am saying that these beliefs occupy a particularly hallowed, unassailable and unscrutinizable position within the mind in a way that no other does. They cannot be questioned and the sociological explanations which they generate do not have viable alternatives; because these alternatives have been characterised and forever sealed to be truly wicked -- racist, the 'heretic' or 'counter-revolutionary' of our time. Due to this, those who do genuinely believe possess the special privilege of having contained within their words and principles a morality the opposing camp lacks. And as a result from this, free discussion is ultimately banished under a pervasive, unspeakable taboo, or, in some countries now (with more to come), illegalized outright.

A little off the discussion, but I think it isn't just this conception that an intrinsic morality is present within the words of the multiculturalist that encases his mind within its mental cage, but there are other psychological factors at play as well. The image of the unenlightened and abhorrent racialist is endlessly juxtaposed in the head of the multculturalist with his own idea of himself. He is educated, intelligent, worldly, experienced and wise**, unlike his opposite, an uneducated, unintelligent, parochical and pitiful specimen in desperate need of his own special brand of improvement. So yes indeed, it is safe to say that it is in many cases snobiness and longing for intellectual status that motivates the multiculturalist.

Quote:


I don't know about that; we've talked about all of this stuff a dozen times before. When you really break this forum down you would get three primary obsessions the memberbase tends to chatter about-- Global Warming, Islam and race. We really need some fresh material.

**
Quote:

Don't start a new thread then. It will save you having to have your views questioned. I personally don't see how you could possibly justify that without resorting to circular logic.