mozzaok wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2009 at 10:55pm:

Stereotypes are derived from observations of common behaviours of certain types of people. Stereotypes are often common behaviours of people. They may be exaggerated but they are often true.

Aussie Skinhead wrote on Dec 24^th, 2009 at 5:58pm:

Why are stereotypes of others more often negative?

Have you noticed that its easier to see fault in others than in oneself?

Aussie Skinhead wrote on Dec 25^th, 2009 at 4:41pm:

And wouldn't people of particular mindsets be predisposed to believe bad things about the other more readily and be less likely to apply any critical thinking to the matter?

Not importing people who have problems... Should that be applied without regard to ethnicity?

Aussie Skinhead wrote on Dec 26^th, 2009 at 11:37am:

If you're predisposed to see the bad in a particular other, you're not in an ideal situation to judge whether what you believe of that other is a fair and true account of their essence... In other words, when it comes to an assessment of that other, you'd have to disqualify yourself from making judgement due to your prejudicial mindset. In your case any non-white is inherently inferior in all the important things including morally and socially... That would make it impossible for you to be fair and just when assessing the character of a non-white individual.

Aussie Skinhead wrote on Dec 27^th, 2009 at 12:50am:

But would you concede that due to your strong dislike of non-whites you would not be capable of making an even-handed and just assessment of a non-white's character?

Aussie Skinhead wrote on Dec 29^th, 2009 at 3:34pm:

I'd suggest that depends on the depth of your animosity towards them... But if you believe you can be even-handed in your judgement of them regardless of the depth of your dislike for them, then would you concede that there are some non-whites who would make (and do make) better citizens than some whites?

Aussie Skinhead wrote on Dec 29^th, 2009 at 3:34pm:

I'm not making any claims, I'm basing on my questions on statements you have made about your expressed opinions about non-whites. You are also clearly an admirer of Nazism, so why do you think its presumptuous of anyone to infer that you agree with their racist ideology?

Aussie Skinhead wrote on Dec 29^th, 2009 at 5:24pm:

Then are you sure you could be reasonable, fair and just in your assessment of non-whites in Australia, given that you don't believe they should be resident here in the first place?

Aussie Skinhead wrote on Dec 29^th, 2009 at 5:24pm:

And National Socialism includes a distinctly racist ideology... So how do you reconcile that with your claims of being capable of fairness towards non-whites?

Aussie Skinhead wrote on Dec 29^th, 2009 at 11:46pm:

Fair to whom? Deport them to where? Justice and fairness require you to put aside how you feel about them and judge them by the content of their character. If they have broken no laws, contribute to the economy, have in every way acted as decent citizens, what possible just reason would there be to expel them against their will?

Should white people be deported if they break Australian law?

Aussie Skinhead wrote on Dec 29^th, 2009 at 11:46pm:

What difference does it make about the origins of a term? Let's call it grebelianism, so long as we agree it includes reference to an act of or predisposition towards vehement hatred of those exhibiting a certain outward physiology and the subsequent act or pre-disposition towards an act of pre-judgement based solely on physiological appearance, then its grebelianism or... racism.