Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
New Value for Pi (Read 4229 times)
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
New Value for Pi
Oct 4th, 2009 at 12:27pm
 
It turns out that Mathematicians have been wrong for centuries about the value of Pi. In a new publication by a Swedish mathematician, the value of Pi has been proven conclusively to be 3.125.

Here is the link to that important piece of work. Note that he has put his money where his mouth is. If you find a single error in his book, you can win 300,000 Swedish Crowns.

http://www.correctpi.com/

I challenge anybody to find a flaw with this treatise.  

Of course, big business have a vested interest in hushing up this important piece of work.

A group of researcher have recent proved that the structural defects in the Twin Towers were due to the incorrect value of Pi being used in its design.

It also highlights a major deficiency in the climate modelling currently being used by the IPCC and clearly shows that man could not have landed on the moon. By using the incorrect value of Pi, they would have actually landed 2.3 million miles, or almost 5% short of the mark.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 4th, 2009 at 12:33pm by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Amadd
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mo

Posts: 6217
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #1 - Oct 4th, 2009 at 3:02pm
 
That's pretty amazing after all these years.
And a possible explanation for the twin towers collapse also? That's huge.
It might explain why the population has slowly been getter fatter too  Tongue

Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 4th, 2009 at 3:19pm by Amadd »  
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #2 - Oct 4th, 2009 at 5:56pm
 
Amadd wrote on Oct 4th, 2009 at 3:02pm:
That's pretty amazing after all these years.
And a possible explanation for the twin towers collapse also? That's huge.
It might explain why the population has slowly been getter fatter too  Tongue



Do I detect a note of skepticism?????  Angry

I'll have you know that this new theory is endorsed by such authorities as (esteemed science advisor to Walter Cronkite) Richard Hoagland:

http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Richard_C._Hoagland
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Amadd
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mo

Posts: 6217
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #3 - Oct 4th, 2009 at 8:59pm
 
Quote:
Do I detect a note of skepticism?????


Nooooo...not skeptical at allllll - or sarcaaaaastic either.
3.125 is far simpler than trying to remember that endless string of numbers.

And it's now obvious that the population has been getting fatter because for all these years we've had too much Pi.  Grin


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 42350
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #4 - Oct 4th, 2009 at 9:13pm
 

amadd - hahahaha

3.1415926535 - from memory
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Amadd
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mo

Posts: 6217
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #5 - Oct 6th, 2009 at 9:35am
 
Quote:
3.1415926535 - from memory


Yeah I had about that many memorised at one stage, because you never know when you might need them  Huh
I checked it out, and you got it spot on.
Here's a few more if you want to extend yourself.
3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510......
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #6 - Oct 6th, 2009 at 9:49am
 
What is it with memorising Pi? I did that too when I was younger.  Some chicks dig that kind of stuff  Grin

Ok , enough levity - Back to the latest research on 911:

http://www.youtube.com/v/lBuH8NNIBys&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&

Wink
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #7 - Oct 6th, 2009 at 9:59am
 
Amadd wrote on Oct 6th, 2009 at 9:35am:
Quote:
3.1415926535 - from memory


Yeah I had about that many memorised at one stage, because you never know when you might need them  Huh
I checked it out, and you got it spot on.
Here's a few more if you want to extend yourself.
3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510......

Check this one out. Daniel Tammet the Aspergers syndrome savant who recited pi to... wait for it... 22500 decimal places from memory.  Shocked

Daniel Tammet reciting PI
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
skippy
Ex Member


Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #8 - Oct 6th, 2009 at 1:12pm
 
Quote:
and clearly shows that man could not have landed on the moon. By using the incorrect value of Pi, they would have actually landed 2.3 million miles, or almost 5% short of the mark


I knew it was faked. Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #9 - Oct 7th, 2009 at 8:31am
 
Unconfirmed reports now state that numerous advocates are streaming to support the new value of Pi. These include Richard Lindzen, and Christopher (screaming lord) Monkton, who has agreed to do a peer review, since he's a fully qualified peer.

http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/UnNews:I_Am_Not_An_Al_Gore_Denier_-_Richard_%...

...

Dick Lindzen is an asexual scientist with perfectly legal financial ties to legitimate tobacco and oil companies. He has recently been diagnosed with lung cancer. Proceeds from donations to the Lindzen Foundation all go toward finding the real cause of his condition.


Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #10 - Oct 7th, 2009 at 4:59pm
 
NorthOfNorth wrote on Oct 6th, 2009 at 9:59am:
Amadd wrote on Oct 6th, 2009 at 9:35am:
Quote:
3.1415926535 - from memory


Yeah I had about that many memorised at one stage, because you never know when you might need them  Huh
I checked it out, and you got it spot on.
Here's a few more if you want to extend yourself.
3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510......

Check this one out. Daniel Tammet the Aspergers syndrome savant who recited pi to... wait for it... 22500 decimal places from memory.  Shocked

Daniel Tammet reciting PI


That was fascinating and amazing. It's incredible how much the brain is capable of calculating and absorbing.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 7th, 2009 at 6:05pm by mantra »  
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #11 - Oct 7th, 2009 at 6:36pm
 
mantra wrote on Oct 7th, 2009 at 4:59pm:
That was fascinating and amazing. It's incredible how much the brain is capable of calculating and absorbing.

Tammet is a bit of a freak of nature. I saw a documentary on him where he learned to speak conversational Icelandic (one of the most difficult European languages for foreigners to grasp) in a week (yep, seven days) from the get go having no knowledge of even one Icelandic word.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #12 - Oct 10th, 2009 at 9:34am
 
Icelandic is Germanic. It's not too difficult to learn if you already speak Swedish Norwegian or Danish. Even English is a help.

I think the most difficult European languages are Finnish, Estonian, Hungarian and Basque, but not necessarily in that order Smiley 



Svifnökkvinn minn er fullur af álum  Grin
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #13 - Oct 22nd, 2009 at 10:52am
 
"Archimedes was a liar"

Pi is 3.125

Lord Christopher Monckton (aka the Potty Peer)


http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/05/monckton_caught_making_things.php

His logo is a bit too pink for me.
Back to top
 

monckton.jpg (11 KB | 55 )
monckton.jpg

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #14 - Oct 23rd, 2009 at 12:14pm
 
Is the Pi thing fair dinkum, or just some piss take?
Sorry if I am too dense to know, but if it is fair dinkum, I am surprised I had not heard about it before now, so my naturally skeptical (and cynical) nature, leads me to assume it must be a joke, but if it is not, it is pretty bizzarre that nobody discovered it before, and noticed how well the original Pi seemed to work, for so long.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
skippy
Ex Member


Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #15 - Oct 23rd, 2009 at 12:42pm
 
I thought the same thing mozz, but then I re read the post and this stuck out-

Quote:
It also highlights a major deficiency in the climate modelling currently being used by the IPCC and clearly shows that man could not have landed on the moon. By using the incorrect value of Pi, they would have actually landed 2.3 million miles, or almost 5% short of the mark


So, do you believe there was a moon landing?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #16 - Oct 23rd, 2009 at 1:08pm
 
Thanks Skippy, I did see that bit, and realised that it was being presented as a pisstake, but link to the guys site looked pretty fair dinkum, and I was wondering more about the author, is it a legitimate guy proposing it, or is it "All" just a joke.
There are people that put forward weird stuff all the time, and they are very sincere about it, I just wondered if the guy who wrote the book is ridgy didge, or like some norman gunston of mathematics.

I wonder if people pull stunts like this to flush the loonies out of the undergrowth to come forward and support them, like GW skeptics have their plethora of experts who support every crackpot idea that comes along, so long as it is against GW.

If he is sincere then it will be interesting to see if anyone can take his money off him, or if everything is couched in such a way to make things ambiguous, so as to be irrefutable.

Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #17 - Oct 23rd, 2009 at 3:36pm
 
Quote:
I thought the same thing mozz, but then I re read the post and this stuck out-

Quote:
It also highlights a major deficiency in the climate modelling currently being used by the IPCC and clearly shows that man could not have landed on the moon. By using the incorrect value of Pi, they would have actually landed 2.3 million miles, or almost 5% short of the mark


Mozzoak was right. It was a pisstake. The moon is only  384 thousand kilometres away. I pulled the 2.3 million miles from nowhere and now that I can be stuffed to do the calculation, 2.3 million miles is  actually 600% of that distance.  Grin

It basically goes to show that people can make totally absurd claims without laughing, and get somebody somewhere to believe them.

As far as the Pi author is concerned, I guess I'd better be serious here -  he's obviously far more advanced than any of us (possibly an alien lifeform). A quick view of this important piece of human endeavour reveals that it is about higher levels above science, sometimes conveniently called philosophy (of Pi). Or it has been called Pi 'Swedish Science' (PISS) or to use the Swedish acronym,  CRANK.  

Now because this incredible work has already reached perfection, there are no errors, hence, no Swedish Crowns  Grin Grin Grin

Quote:

So, do you believe there was a moon landing?


As The governor of California would say "Get owt of heer"
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 23rd, 2009 at 10:21pm by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Happy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 559
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #18 - Oct 23rd, 2009 at 5:52pm
 


Sprintcyclist wrote on Oct 4th, 2009 at 9:13pm:
amadd - hahahaha

3.1415926535 - from memory



Isn't it    22 / 7  ?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #19 - Oct 23rd, 2009 at 7:40pm
 
3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 4197

That's Pi to 39 digits. At that level of precision, a circle encompassing the diameter of the known universe would be accurate to the diameter of a proton.

Not sure if this attachment will work, but it's a pi calculator. It calculates Pi to heaps more digits than you'll ever need..
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 23rd, 2009 at 10:23pm by muso »  

picalc.zip (9 KB | 21 )

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
HypnoticTortoise
New Member
*
Offline


A pox on both your houses.

Posts: 2
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #20 - Nov 13th, 2009 at 5:55pm
 
This would be very easy to disprove.  Draw a circle with a diameter of 1m and then get a piece of string 3.125m long......
Back to top
 

If you sit by the river long enough, you will see the body of your enemy float by - Japanese proverb.&&&&We cannot, in any circumstances acquiesce to the non-utilisation of any weapons which are avail
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #21 - Nov 17th, 2009 at 8:51am
 
HypnoticTortoise wrote on Nov 13th, 2009 at 5:55pm:
This would be very easy to disprove.  Draw a circle with a diameter of 1m and then get a piece of string 3.125m long......



It's a crank site that I selected at random to make a point.  Wink

The point was that if you make an argument with enough technical detail to confuse your readers, then you might actually convince some people, especially if they want to believe the conclusion in the first place.  Smiley
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Darwin
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1037
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #22 - Nov 17th, 2009 at 9:28am
 
It is really amazing that right back from the days of Archimedes people have been calculating the value of pi and each generation just defines it a bit. And the method used in Ancient Greece is still used now: making quadrilaterals to fill the area of a circle, all the more amazing because all they had back then was a straight edge (not a ruler, a straight edge) and a compass!

Calculating pi is done with new computers to make sure they work correctly. it is also done to thousands of decimal places to provide tables of random numbers.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #23 - Nov 17th, 2009 at 10:06am
 
I was taken in by it, even though the bit about missing the moon was there to highlight it's silliness, the fact that I have no understanding of the finer points of mathematics, and that he put his money where his mouth is, created enough uncertainty for me.

It is very instructional in highlighting the old Menzies truism, "bullshit baffles brains", a system he used to great effect to stay in power longer than any other PM in our history.


In fact, I am so confused by the whole question now, that I could probably be tricked even further on the subject.

That muso chose to show it as an example of how confusionalist deniers work their mass voodoo made me consider just how easily people who have no great interest in a subject, or expert knowledge of a subject, can be so easily taken in.

Of course denialists will make the claim that all the governments and great scientific institutions of the world are colluding to produce a lie, and they, and the handful of dissenting scientists, are the ones clever enough to see through it.

That is their case in a nutshell, once you have stripped away all their lies and confusionalist BS, and so we, the average people, are left with a choice of whom should we believe?

Now few are more cynical than myself, and few have a greater mistrust of bureaucracy, and politicians, but even coming from that position, I still cannot see how it would be possible for so many independent individuals to come together and collude to create such a global phenomenon.

On top of that we have the science, real data, from real scientists, whose arguments are not even challenged by denialists, because they know they do not have any evidence to credibly challenge the science, and this is where the quasi scientists come in, working from tractor sheds in ohio, you can get theories on water vapour being the driving factor, and evangelical bible quotes from the same source.

Of course people have the right to be skeptical, and the right to be cynical, but that does not give them the right to be disingenuous at best, or dishonest at worst.

When the skeptics come up with some real science that impresses the real climate scientists, then I will be happy to reappraise my stance, but unless that happens, I have to support the best qualified, and most experienced people in the world, when they tell me what is happening.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #24 - Nov 17th, 2009 at 11:00am
 
mozzaok wrote on Nov 17th, 2009 at 10:06am:
I was taken in by it, even though the bit about missing the moon was there to highlight it's silliness.


Actually Amadd's point about the population having too much Pi , just about had me in hysterics. I wish I had thought of that one myself.   Grin

Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
HypnoticTortoise
New Member
*
Offline


A pox on both your houses.

Posts: 2
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #25 - Nov 18th, 2009 at 12:20am
 
muso wrote on Nov 17th, 2009 at 8:51am:
HypnoticTortoise wrote on Nov 13th, 2009 at 5:55pm:
This would be very easy to disprove.  Draw a circle with a diameter of 1m and then get a piece of string 3.125m long......



It's a crank site that I selected at random to make a point.  Wink

The point was that if you make an argument with enough technical detail to confuse your readers, then you might actually convince some people, especially if they want to believe the conclusion in the first place.  Smiley



Yep, you can make anyone believe just about anything, the American prove it everyday.

I have been haunting an American chat room and the poo those guys come out with simply beggars belief...
Back to top
 

If you sit by the river long enough, you will see the body of your enemy float by - Japanese proverb.&&&&We cannot, in any circumstances acquiesce to the non-utilisation of any weapons which are avail
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23041
A cat with a view
Re: New Value for Pi
Reply #26 - Nov 26th, 2009 at 11:30am
 
22/7, will do me fine.     Tongue      Grin



Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print