Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
the west decides (Read 3335 times)
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: the west decides
Reply #15 - Nov 30th, 2009 at 2:22pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Nov 30th, 2009 at 11:41am:
Personally I don't think it's the case, but then again, Jews in pre-WWII Europe didn't think that either about some of the measures that were undertaken back then.

I don't believe it's the case either but it would be some black irony... Muslims in solidarity with Jews. Grin
abu_rashid wrote on Nov 30th, 2009 at 11:41am:
A line in the sand against political Islam?? How so? It's a ban on something not even sanctioned by Islam. It is nothing but a symbolic measure, to appear as if they're addressing peoples xenophobic grievances. It's a joke really, it does nothing to political Islam whatsoever. In fact the most politically active Islamist groups usually don't even engage in building mosques. This statement really highlights how ignorant you are about this area helian. As I already stated, this is a win for Islamist groups, since it will push the "moderates" even closer to them, since they are the ones who busy themselves with building mosques and will now perceive the attack on Islam as beginning. Islamist groups usually set themselves up in temporary rented premises and usually do not concern themselves with building landmarks. The Swiss are not very smart if you ask me.

It is a potent statement nonetheless... And if it does provokes an over-reaction from Muslims, then that will be fuel for a far right over-reaction.

abu_rashid wrote on Nov 30th, 2009 at 11:41am:
If you truly believed in Democracy, then you'd have no problem with political Islam or political Christianity. So you don't actually believe in Democracy?

If I truly believed in secular democracy, which I do, I would oppose both religious dictatorships and non-religious totalitarianism, which I do.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: the west decides
Reply #16 - Nov 30th, 2009 at 2:23pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Nov 30th, 2009 at 1:14pm:
mozza,

As usual you gotta play the goose, a part you're extremely adept at.

Nowhere did I state anyone is anti-Minaret. It's more a case of those who like them for their aesthetic purposes (normally the more moderate Muslims) who Switzerland has just decided to alienate, out of their immense wisdom. And then there's those who are indifferent, mostly Islamists, who the Swiss actually think they're targetting by this, and who some think will be halted by this so called "line in the sand".

Quite simply put, this is a token action, which merely alienates those Muslims the West claims are acceptable to them, whilst not bothering the supposed Muslims the West claims are the troublemakers.

Note: The terms "Moderate" and "Islamist" are used purely for your benefit. No such actual concrete divisions like this exist, but it seems to be the only way "Westerners" are able to comprehend Muslims.




Clearly.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41827
Gender: male
Re: the west decides
Reply #17 - Nov 30th, 2009 at 4:05pm
 

more mad muslim doublespeak ..........

Quote:
INDONESIA'S biggest Muslim group condemned today a Swiss vote to ban the construction of new minarets as a manifestation of religious hatred, but urged a restrained response.

A majority of Swiss voters yesterday backed a far-right initiative to outlaw new minarets, the towers attached to mosques from which the call to prayer is announced.

Maskuri Abdillah, the head of Nahdlatul Ulama which has 40 million members in the world's biggest Muslim-majority country, called on followers not to be provoked by the vote.

"This is the hatred of Swiss people against Muslim communities. They don't want to see a Muslim presence in their country and this intense dislike has made them intolerant,'' he said.

"It's very regrettable... obviously this is a narrow-minded way of thinking about Muslims.''

He said tolerance was the best answer to intolerance.

"We call on Indonesian Muslims not to take revenge over the decision. We should show them tolerance and the freedom of religion,'' Abdillah said, adding that any protests should be peaceful.
Nearly 90 per cent of Indonesia's 234 million people are Muslims and most practise a moderate form of the religion, although the country has suffered a spate of extremist attacks.



http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/vote-shows-hatred-of-muslims/story-fn...

pushy intolerant muslim runs. The swiss took a vote for themselves in their own country.
why do you have to ask for your mad followers to show a  "restrained response" and   not "be provoked" ? Why, what will they do ?
That's a vieled threat if i ever saw one.

switzerland is NOT a muslim country - it's got NOTHING to do with you.

it is one of the best countries in the world, musim ones are ALL in the lowest arena.

get out of switzerland, get out of england, europe, france  and aussie
noone there likes you.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: the west decides
Reply #18 - Nov 30th, 2009 at 9:09pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Nov 30th, 2009 at 1:14pm:
(normally the more moderate Muslims) who Switzerland has just decided to alienate, out of their immense wisdom..



You got it back to front, as usual, Comical Ali.

The Swiss voted againt the minarets primarily because the Mohamedans among them are an alien presence. The Muslims come alienated as an opening gambit. It's not for the Swiss to cuddle them. The onus is on the Muslims to eliminate their alien ways (but what's the chance of that?!), not on the Swiss to get used to them.

And because the establishement everywhere, including Switzerland, is relentlessly pushing the multiculturalist line - ie that the locals gotta get used to the alien ways of the Muslims - the locals have told them both to get nicked. "Practice your religion, Ali, but not in my ear, not in my face!!" That's the message. The establishement and the Mohamedans are peeved.

The juxtapostion of a faceless, menacing looking bint in a burqa with missile minarets gets an A+ in Semiology 101.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: the west decides
Reply #19 - Nov 30th, 2009 at 11:54pm
 
Quote:
..cause a grossly disproportionate degree of violence...


You gotta be havin' a lend of me 'ere mozza, right??? Muslims would need several millenia to catch up with the Christians, and even worse the atheists in the grossly disproportionate degree of violence category.

Can you show me for instance where all throughout the 1400 year existence of Islam, Muslims were responsible for killing as many as you atheists killed in the Killing Fields of Cambodia? Or during Stalin's purges? Or Mao's Cultural Revolution??? Please do mozza, this should be good... And that's only last century!

Now you've ceased acting the goose, and just come across as a complete fool.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: the west decides
Reply #20 - Dec 1st, 2009 at 12:05am
 
Quote:
I don't believe it's the case either but it would be some black irony... Muslims in solidarity with Jews.


Not that ironic. In fact it was a Jew who first spoke about the similarities between contemporary European views of Muslims and views of Jews a century ago, which led to pogoroms and the like.

"In 1886 the French antisemite Edouard Drumont published 'La France Juive' (Jewish France), creating the false nightmarish image of a France dominated by Jews, and sowing the poisonous seeds which came to fruit when Vichy French officials collaborated in the mass murder of French Jewry. [...] Bat Ye'or follows in notorious footsteps indeed by creating the false nightmarish image of a Europe dominated by Arabs and Muslims." (Israeli peace activist Adam Keller, speaking on Bat Yeor's 'Eurabia' theory)

Quote:
It is a potent statement nonetheless...


Potent statement of bungled stupidity you mean? It achieves absolutely nothing, as I said, other than alienating the people who probably seek the most to co-operate with them.

Quote:
And if it does provokes an over-reaction from Muslims, then that will be fuel for a far right over-reaction.


I doubt it'll provoke an "over-reaction", as I said, it'll probably just quietly drive those who were more towards the moderate end of the scale, a little closer to the other end. Which is really counter-productive to what the West has been working to achieve so far (ie. the creation of a climate amongst Muslims that was envisioned in the Rand Report).

Quote:
I would oppose both religious dictatorships and non-religious totalitarianism, which I do.


But there is no Islamic religious dictatorship in Switzerland. And the claim they were working towards it, but now we've halted that, by stopping them building little towers next to their places of worship is just stupendous, to say the least..
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41827
Gender: male
Re: the west decides
Reply #21 - Dec 1st, 2009 at 12:28am
 

FKWT abu - show me in the athiests "rule book" where it says athiests should rule the world, by whatever means?

idiot.

athiests are pretty much the most ethical people I have ever argued against.
taoists and buddhists are right up there too.


the sexist, violent dominating laws are from mohammad the child buggerer.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: the west decides
Reply #22 - Dec 1st, 2009 at 5:24am
 
Quote:
You gotta be havin' a lend of me 'ere mozza, right??? Muslims would need several millenia to catch up with the Christians, and even worse the atheists in the grossly disproportionate degree of violence category.


Well Abu, naturally, for most of the millenia when they were an insignificant backwater religion, they did not have as large an impact as the dominant religions and cultures of the day, and certainly were not involved in as many big wars as the christians, so historically I agree that christians do have a very bloody history.

However, we are discussing the modern muslim, the muslim emboldened by the success in Iran of their extremist brothers, and in that context, we could say they are pretty bloody violent.

Now if we just look at the 15,000 or so terror attacks that Muslims have carried out since 9/11, we do get a picture of a less than peaceful, homogenous group of devout people, merely trying to go about their own business.

If we look to all the trouble spots around the globe, we do not have to look far to find a muslim support base for that violence.

What is also of great concern is the muslim's terror organisations move into major drug trafficking, with huge amounts of Heroin, Cocaine, Ecstasy, and Speed, being transported and protected by groups like Al Quaeda, for the twofold benefit of their cause, to get money for weapons, and to see the youth of western democracies given even greater access to addictive drugs.

Now if the west were the only ones to suffer, that would be bad enough, but when we see the young muslims along this nefarious drug trail, also falling prey to this massive trade, well then we must question the claims these extremists make, that they are righteous men, doing god's work.

I remain totally unapologetic for stating that muslims are at the centre of most violent conflicts in the world today, and while I accept it takes two to tango, very often the two involved, are muslim brothers, killing over which brand of Islam to believe, not just fighting against foreign powers like australia, who are trying to bring peace to their region, and aid them in getting to the point where they can provide their own security, for their own people, from such extremist muslims promoting, and spreading violence across the world, and amomgst themselves.

If muslims could clean up their act, the west would happily be out of there like a shot.

As well we have Abu's claim of driving moderates to extremism by the minaret decision, well even though I agree to some extent with that remark, I wold qualify it by saying that extremists, who declare moderates "apostate", are creating the fear of retribution in the muslim community for any who do not toe their extremist line, and I would contend that, that is a far greater influence on causing moderate muslims to remain silent about the gross misdeeds of the extremists, than the attitudes of sovereign nations trying to protect their own cultural identity.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 1st, 2009 at 5:30am by mozzaok »  

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: the west decides
Reply #23 - Dec 1st, 2009 at 7:17am
 
I wonder if we did a count of Muslim deaths - even those who didn't die immediately from shrapnel or DU, would it equal or surpass those from the West who have been killed by Muslims?

These wars are political - it's all about oil, even the pipeline through Afghanistan is the major reason we are over there.

Yes there are terrorists, but we also have to include ourselves. Our weapons are more sophisticated so cause a lot more collateral damage. I'm not excusing all Muslims as many of them are barbaric, but those old western puppet masters are sitting back, plotting, planning and pulling strings for the sake of profit at the expense of human lives.

We should have left them alone, regardless of the wealth some of these Muslim nations contain and got on with our own business. If we had we wouldn't have to accept the deluge of refugees and immigrants that we complain so much about.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: the west decides
Reply #24 - Dec 1st, 2009 at 7:59am
 
The trouble with leaving "them" alone, is when we have tried that, they have given us, Al Quaeda, and the Taliban.
Unfortunately, until they show a desire, and ability, to self regulate, then leaving them alone is not a safe option for the world to even consider.
It is akin to asking society (the west) to leave a violent delinquent youth(Islamists), with deadbeat parents(the great muslim ummah), to his own devices, and hope he does not get into too much mischief.

So either the deadbeat parents step up, and get their bad kid in line, or society does the best it can in the meantime.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: the west decides
Reply #25 - Dec 1st, 2009 at 10:03am
 
mantra wrote on Dec 1st, 2009 at 7:17am:
We should have left them alone, regardless of the wealth some of these Muslim nations contain and got on with our own business. If we had we wouldn't have to accept the deluge of refugees and immigrants that we complain so much about.



Just a few facts from the Immigration update. It's good to argue on the basis of factual data:

Quote:
Australia’s net permanent addition was 129 017, an increase of 7.7 per cent over the previous year.

On a regional basis, Europe (20.7 per cent) was the largest contributor followed by Oceania (16.2 per cent), Southern Asia (16.0 per cent) and Northeast Asia (15.1 per cent).

The United Kingdom (15.0 per cent) was the single largest birthplace group followed by New Zealand (13.4 per cent), India (11.0 per cent), China (excl. SARs & Taiwan) (10.3 per cent) South Africa (3.8 per cent) and the Philippines (3.6 per cent).

There were 158 292 permanent additions under the Migration (non-Humanitarian) Program with the Skill Stream accounting for 107 469, an additional 50 680 under the Family Stream and 143 under Special Eligibility. There were a further 11 729 permanent additions under the Humanitarian Program.

Compared with the 2006-07 financial year, permanent additions under the Migration Program increased by 7.1 per cent. Permanent additions under the Humanitarian Program decreased by 17.2 per cent.


Those figures will show a continued decrease in humanitarian program uptakes in 2008-9 based on current policies. The priority has been shifted to Skill Stream. We still have an enormous shortfall in some skills, such as nursing (we need an extra 40,000), doctors (about 2000 all up) teachers (estimated around 30,000) and engineers (28000).

They estimate that we need an increase in nursing graduates of 120% to remedy that shortfall. A friend who is a newly graduated nurse told me that from a class of 36 nursing students, only 6 passed this year. She was one of the lucky ones.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 1st, 2009 at 10:11am by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: the west decides
Reply #26 - Dec 1st, 2009 at 10:16am
 
And while we're arguing using factual data...

Of the 13.4% who are from New Zealand - the second highest immigrant group, none were chosen necessarily for required skills, probably none were checked for a criminal history (those who were refused, if any, on the basis of not being of good character, would have been the most serious of criminals or those previously deported from Australia) and none are necessarily required to find work (so long as they can stick out the waiting period before being eligible for the dole)...

Puts the fear of Middle Eastern and Oriental asylum seekers into a bit of perspective.

Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: the west decides
Reply #27 - Dec 1st, 2009 at 12:38pm
 
mozza,

Quote:
The trouble with leaving "them" alone, is when we have tried that, they have given us, Al Quaeda, and the Taliban.


When exactly was "leaving them alone" supposedly trialled?? The Western nations have not ceased their meddling in the Muslim world since the end of the colonial period.

Here's an interesting quote from an ex-President of the U.S regarding the West's "leaving" the Muslim world alone:

"There's a campaign of hatred against us in the Middle East, not by governments, but by the people." The National Security Council discussed that question and said, "Yes, and the reason is, there's a perception in that region that the United States supports status quo governments, which prevent democracy and development and that we do it because of our interests in Middle East oil. Furthermore, it's difficult to counter that perception because it's correct."

Can you guess which President? Hint, he wasn't a post-9/11 president...

The circular argument that the West has to interfere in the Middle East because of 9/11 is just ludicrous. The meddling predates that event by decades, and some honest analysts of the situation have quite openly stated that those decades of meddling, bombing, coups, support of brutal regimes, arming the Zionist occupation to the teeth etc. were probably what led to 9/11 and other aggressions from the Muslim world. Wake up mozza...
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: the west decides
Reply #28 - Dec 1st, 2009 at 12:40pm
 
Quote:
Of the 13.4% who are from New Zealand... none were checked for a criminal history... none are necessarily required to find work (so long as they can stick out the waiting period before being eligible for the dole)...

Puts the fear of Middle Eastern and Oriental asylum seekers into a bit of perspective.


Are you saying we should rightfully direct our anti-immigrant hatred at sprint instead of the afghans and iraqis?  Grin
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: the west decides
Reply #29 - Dec 1st, 2009 at 12:56pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Dec 1st, 2009 at 12:40pm:
Quote:
Of the 13.4% who are from New Zealand... none were checked for a criminal history... none are necessarily required to find work (so long as they can stick out the waiting period before being eligible for the dole)...

Puts the fear of Middle Eastern and Oriental asylum seekers into a bit of perspective.


Are you saying we should rightfully direct our anti-immigrant hatred at sprint instead of the afghans and iraqis?  Grin

Well, I guess being the naturally decent people we Australians are and given our inclinations of overwrought largesse towards trans-Tasman plane-people... I guess we will take his word for it that he's skilled, of good character and has a job...

After all plane-people don't lie...

Do they?   

Wink
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print