why pick on islam solely ?

1. Can we find Jihadi organization in any other religions such: Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Hizbullah, Horkut-ul- Jihad, Horkut-ul-mujahedin, Jaise Muhamad, Jihad-e-Muhammad, Tahrik-e-Nifaj-shariaat-e-Muhammad, Al-Hikhma, Al-badr-Mujaheddin, Jamah-e-Islamia, Hijb-e-Islamia, etc. etc.? We can find several dozens of Jihadi Islamic terrorist organizations exists in every Muslim country throughout the world. Can we find such organization in other religions? If not, then why?

2. We can find dozens of countries ruled by Islamic Shariaat (Huhud laws) where Quran is the only viable constitution. All Muslim majority countries also have family laws enforced as per Quranic laws. We can still find many Islamic Republics exist in this modern world of 21st century. My questions here are: Can we find any country ruled by Bible, Old Testament or Ghita today? Can we find just one Republic for Christian, Jewish, Hindus or Buddhas? If the answer is no, then please tell us why no?

3. Islam has become a fearful religion in the whole world today. Islamic terrorists are conspiring to kill innocent civilians, especially western civilians everywhere in the whole world. Whole civilized world is in a panic situation for fear of Islamic terrorism. Horrific incident of killing hundreds of innocent school children in Beslan, Russia, terrorism in Philippine, terrorism in Madrid metro train, terrorisms in the hotels, foreign embassies or tourist resorts in Indonesia, Bomb blasting in the Churches, Mosques of Shiite and Qadiani sects of Muslims-all have the cardinal hall marks of peaceful Islam. German police had arrested an al-Qaeda sympathizer and his fiancé on suspicion of planning to bomb the U.S. Army's European headquarters and other targets in Heidelberg, Germany. Interestingly these arrested al-Qaeda sympathizers were none but Muslims who kept pictures of Osama bin Laden in their apartment. My questions are: why could not these two human beings belonging Hindu, Jew or Christian? Why can't we incriminate any other religion for the acts of terrorism in the entire world?

4. Honor killing is the most inhuman and most disgraceful act by any human standard. This act is condemned by any sane human being today. But surprisingly-this horrendous episode is only present in the Muslim countries and Muslim societies. Islamists will argue that there is nothing in the Quran which suggests honor killing! Well, question here is, if Islam has nothing to do with it, then why it is only practiced by Muslims? NO OTHER SOCIETIES EXCEPT ISLAM PRACTICE IT, PERIOD. Even in the same country-example Nigeria, Northern Nigerian (Muslims) do practice this heinous act, but Southern Nigeria (Christians) do not practice this at all. This horrific uncivilized honor killing also had happened in the heart of United States of America (Mid-western state) again in an Arab immigrant Muslim family. It may present in any country in the whole world-but 100% sure that it will be happened only in a Muslim family. My questions here are-please tell me why Muslims only perform this heinous act? Why this act is totally absent in any other religions?

5. Today in the whole world Muslims are apologetic to the entire humankind for the shameful terrorisms and constantly trying to erase this stigma by various apologetic fruitless arguments and excuses. They are trying very hard to disown Osama Bin Laden and other Islamic terrorists by saying “Islam has been hijacked” etc. Some times after 9/11 ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) held four days full-fledged program in the Washington, D.C. to disown the burden of doubt in Islam by using same-old apologetic slogans-“Islam is a religion of peace” or Prophet Muhammad is the God's mercy to earth” etc. These Islamists of North America also tried to fool the westerners (may be they fooled themselves) by quoting a few good/kind Quranic verses. They all simply blamed Western Media for projecting Islam as the religion of terrorism. With much hypocrisy they absolutely hide all those hundreds of hateful/dreadful Quranic verses. My question here is-why any other religionists do not need to do all these hypocrisies like Islamists are doing today? Why Western Medias are not projecting any other religion as the religion of terror?

6. “Jihad” is the most fearful and despised word spoken/uttering throughout the whole world today. This famous word “Jihad” belongs to one religion, and that is-“Islam”. My question is-why Jihad belongs to only Islam?

7. Suicide-bombing only to kill innocent human beings (only to target civilian) is committed by Muslims only. In Palestine-Israeli conflict hundreds of incidents of such heinous suicide attempts have occurred so far. It was quite obvious that all these suicide bombers were brainwashed by the fiery inspirational teachings by Islamic clergy citing various Quranic dictums and hadiths. Among the Palestine citizens there are good percentage of Christian minority who support Palestinian cause and they are also enemy of Israel. Surprisingly, not a single “suicide bomber” could be found who was a Christian. My questions here are-why there was no suicide bomber evolved out of those Christian-born Palestinians? Why it is the only Muslims committing this horrendous act of suicide bombing?

15. Brotherhood in Islam: Islam is the only religion having brotherhood or Ummatic provision. One Muslim is considered brother of another Muslim only. A Muslim can not be a brother of Hindu, Christian or Jews or infidels. Muslims are forbidden even to pray for any infidels. Allah's instruction for Islamic Brotherhood: Quran-49:10-“The believers are but a single Brotherhood: So make peace and reconciliation between your two (contending) brothers; And fear God, that ye May receive Mercy” (Yousuf Ali's Translation). In his Shan-e-nuzul, Maulana Yousuf Ali stated: “The enforcement of the Muslim brotherhood is the greatest social ideal of Islam. On it was based the Prophet's Sermon at his last pilgrimage, and Islam cannot be completely realized until this is achieved.” Therefore, Islam is like a large-scale religious cult which does not recognize any other religion as pure religion. My question here is why no other religious group has such separatist brotherhood system?

16. Islam and poverty: Poverty and Islam goes side by side. Islam means submission to Allah. Therefore, general Muslims become like a dependent servant of unseen authority in the sky. Muslims loose their strength and desire of freethinking and innovation. Result is pure poverty. Look everywhere-Muslims are the poorest human beings on earth. Go to Africa or Asia-every Muslim majority country is a desperately poor country. Please don't try to cite some Arab oil-rich countries as the denial to my assertion. Because, that happened only due to the discovery of oil by the west-such as America and Britain. Before that, all the Arabs were miserably poor country. Muslims are poor even in a same country or region: In Nigeria-northern (Muslim majority) people are poor, but southern (Christian majority) people are rich and affluent. In Europe-only two most poor countries are Bosnia and Albania. Both of these European countries are populated by convert Muslims of same Caucasian white peoples. But they are poorer than their neighbors. My question here is why it has to be always like that? Does Islam have anything to do with this incredible scenario?

17. Muslim World: Do you know we have two worlds in the same planet earth? One is the real world (with every nation except the Islamic nations) and other is the Muslim world (with all the Islamic nations only). Surprisingly, there is no Christian world, no Hindu world or any Jewish world, Buddhist world or infidel world. But we have Muslim world. My question here is: why there is no Christian, Hindu, Buddhist or Jewish world?

18. Democracy: Democracy was invented to establish people's rules to govern a nation. Entire mankind knows it well that no religious edicts/rules can be compatible with the modern democracy. But do you know-Islamists make their laughable claim that, “Islam is compatible with the democracy”? Islam is 100% incompatible with the democracy; even then Islamists readily claim that-“Islam is compatible with democracy”! My question here is: do we hear about Christian, Hindu or Jewish democracy?

19. September 11, Episode: America and other nations of the entire world will remember Sept.11 as the most terrible day of the human history and everybody will pass the day with much sorrow and sombre mood. But do you know there are some Islamic folks (special human species) in Finsbury Park Mosque in north London who had celebrated (in 2003) this horrible day as the “towering day” of Islam? These Islamic fanatics had hailed/applauded the Sept.11 devilish deeds of those al-Qaeda heroes as the best deeds any Muslim can do. They had formed the supreme Islamic council of London and vowed to fight for making England an Islamic Paradise. Their future plan will be to convert entire world including infidel America into a perfect Islamic Paradise. My questions are: do we get to see this kind of madness amongst any other religions? If not then why?

20. Blaming Electronic Media: Islamists have a very funny way of judging correctness and authenticity of Media news. Whenever western Media like CNN or MSNBC broadcast something in their favor or likings they will try to highlight it 100 folds. But the moment news goes against their choice/likings-they will immediately call it western propaganda or Zionist conspiracy. What a double standard by those Islamists!

These Islamists blame western Medias for their own terrorist activities. Now a day, almost 100% of world's terrorisms are perpetrated directly by some devout Muslims. Not only that, immediately after the completion of their heinous terrorist act, some faction of Islamists takes the responsibility of the terrorist act. As for example, just this week terrorist bomb attack outside Australian embassy in Jakarta, Indonesia-the al-Qaeda link group Jamaah-e-Islamia has claimed responsibility just after a few hours of the incident and warned further attacks. Then why blame western Medias? Besides, when police arrests some terrorist suspects, they (suspects) are always having Muslim's identity in their fore-heads. Then what the western Medias are supposed to broadcast? Should they broadcast that some Hindus or Jews have perpetrated the crime? What a strange and ridiculous complaint by those hypocritical Islamists!


why question islam - why not ?

and how many of those use terrorist bombers ?
how many want to take over the world?
how many are supported by other christians/nonchristians
where are the justifications in the NT ??

Quote:


Most of them have used bombings as a form of terrorising the governments/groups they are opposed to.

Quote:


How is it relevant? Many of them want to establish Christian religious states. After that, who knows?

Quote:


I'd say all of them. They simply couldn't function without the support of their fellow Christians. The Irish groups for instance are well known to have received funding and political support from Christian sympathisers all around the world.

Quote:


No idea, ask them. Perhaps they take their justifications from the OT, not all Christians agree with you that the NT is the only source of Christian teaching, in fact I'd say most wouldn't. So you're the minority, not they.

Many of those groups I listed above have engaged in bombings and other violence, one of them is actually listed in the top 10 most active terrorist groups in the world by the National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism. The National Liberation Front of Tripura has also been accused of forbily converting non-Christians to Christianity. It has also produced pornographic videos of hostages they've taken, using the proceeds of selling them, to fund their insurgency, and use their female prisoners as sex slaves.

Some others were involved in the holocaust and various pogoroms against Jews, and we all know what the KKK do to blacks and other racial minorities.

Moving onto the LRA, they regularly engage in massacres, abductions, mutilations, torture, rape  and keep captives as sex slaves. Justification can be found for every single one of these actions in the Bible, even if you don't accept it, it's there, and some Christians apparently do use it as justification for their actions. They also wear rosary beads and recite passages from the Bible when going into battle.

The fact is sprint that people of all religions can commit excesses, and yet others are oppressed enough into having no option but to use resistance methods to defend and maintain themselves. Christians are the only people I know of though who actually do these things, like the bombings in America, even when they're not being oppressed, occupied, fought against. They do it just purely based on their beliefs and their perception that certain governments are behaving contrary to their beliefs.

Quote:


Really? So what does the word Kamikaze mean??

The modern history of suicide attacks seems to indicate it's more of a European practice than a Muslim one. Muslims have only begun using this method for the past few years, and probably only out of desperation.

The first recorded instance of suicide attacks in recent history was from the Qing official Yu Yonghe who recorded that injured Dutch soldiers fighting against Koxinga's forces for control of Taiwan in 1661 would use gunpowder to blow up both themselves and their opponents.

Then during the Belgian Revolution, the Dutch Lieutenant Jan van Speijk detonated his own ship in the harbour of Antwerp.

(Seems to be a Dutch phenomena thus far..)

Another example was the Prussian soldier Karl Klinke on 18 April 1864 at the Battle of Dybbøl, when he blew a hole in a Danish fortification...

Modern suicide bombing as a political tool can be traced back to the assassination of Czar Alexander II of Russia in 1881. Alexander fell victim to a Nihilist plot. While driving on one of the central streets of Saint Petersburg, near the Winter Palace, he was mortally wounded by the explosion of hand-made grenades and died a few hours afterwards. The Tzar was killed by a member of Narodnaya Volya, Ignacy Hryniewiecki, who died while intentionally exploding the bomb during the attack. Rudolf Christoph Freiherr von Gersdorff intended to assassinate Adolf Hitler by suicide bomb in 1943, but was unable to complete the attack.

(Prussians, Germans and Russians, all Christians...)

During the Battle for Berlin the Luftwaffe flew "Self-sacrifice missions" (Selbstopfereinsatz) against Soviet bridges over the River Oder. These 'total missions' were flown by pilots of the Leonidas Squadron under the command of Lieutenant Colonel Heiner Lange. From 17 April until 20 April 1945, using any aircraft that were available.

(More Germans..)

Following World War II, Viet Minh "death volunteers" fought against the French colonial army by using a long stick-like explosive to destroy French tanks.

(Vietnamese.. mostly Buddhists & Christians I think..)

A popular Hindu nationalist leader in India called for the formation of Hindu suicide squads, Bal Thackeray, a Hindu nationalist in India and president of the Shiv Sena issued a call to form Hindu suicide squads. In 2002, Thackeray issued this call. At least two organizations founded and managed by the retired Indian Army officers namely Lt Col (retired) Jayant Rao Chitale and Lt Ge. P.N. Hoon (former commander-in-chief of the Western Command), answered Bal Thackeray’s call to set up the Suicide Squads in India. Lt Gen. Hoon claimed, Thackeray instructed him to set up the training camps.

(Hindus...)

The famous "Bra bomber" who committed a suicide bombing of Indian PM Rajiv Gandhi (and killing 14 others) was certainly not a Muslim.

(Hindu again?..)

Interestingly the first suicide attack against Israel was actually carried out by Japanese, not Palestinians. Three Japanese used grenades and automatic rifles to kill 26 people and wound many more in the hall of the Lod airport in Tel Aviv, Israel in 1972. The group belonged to the Japanese Red Army. Members of the JRA became instructors in martial art and kamikaze operations at several training camps bringing the suicide techniques to the Middle East

(Shinto? Communists?...)

During WWII, thousands of Japanese pilots carried out Kamikaze suicide missions. This is in addition to Banzai charge attacks, in which tens of thousands of foot soldiers carried out suicide missions, charging at the enemy directly, hoping to kill them and die at the same time.

(Shinto/Japanese...)

The usage of the term "suicide bombing" dates back to at least 1940. A 10 August 1940 New York Times article mentions the term in relation to German tactics. A 4 March 1942 article refers to a Japanese attempt at a "suicide bombing" on an American carrier. Even earlier, though not using the exact phrase, the magazine Modern Mechanix (February 1936) reports the Italians reacted to a possible oil embargo by stating that they would carry out attacks with "a squadron of aviators pledged to crash their death-laden planes in suicidal dives directly onto the decks of British ships".

So it appears another of your article's claims is shattered.

This is scary stuff; somehow Australian Government does not seem to note the connections.

I wander how many possible attacks will be averted and I fear that one day they might miss one!

Quote:


In case it failed to register in that empty cranium of yours, Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan are all in a state of war as well...

Either way, the point was crushed, others besides Muslims have definitely employed suicide attacks, and in fact Muslims are very late newcomers to this practice, stretching back no more than about 20-30 years at the most.

Quote:


Ooo from inside a mosque?? 
Wait till I post for you some of the sermons from the LRA churches.

Anyway I'll leave you to it.

I could waste my time smashing the rest of these ridiculous claims, but there's no point. Some people are just beyond comprehending..

Quote:


http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,26045834-5003402,00.html

cripes, 3 of the 4 groups are muslims.
wonder what drove them to this ?