rotflmao
DWMT

Quote:



I always thought that increased level of CO2 will lead to increased vegetation hence starting process again with storing Carbon and Hydrocarbons for future use, with raised oceans level helping to burry new growth from access to oxygen.

To say it in other words, the cycle can repeat itself.

It would not be possible with mere 0.03% CO2 in the atmosphere.


(Could be wrong thou, as I did not run the computer simulation)

Quote:



For a little red devil you bow to the mainstream in this instance with undue haste. Could it be because in this case the 'mainstream' is for complete social control that naturally appeals to your red ideology?
Just saying because as a leftoid you should be a reflexive contrarian.

Quote:



The thing is, on past for, if leftoids believe something, it MUST be wrong.

Happy wrote on Aug 11^th, 2009 at 4:45pm:



Let's take an analogy. A plant deprived of water will not grow any faster if you add more fertiliser. As a matter of fact, it will probably die. So there are (at least) two dimensions - actually many more, to increased growth rates - water and fertiliser.

Think about it.

Soren wrote on Aug 19^th, 2009 at 10:58pm:


bugger you're stupid , all the scientists aren't wrong but the people who believe what those scientists say are,  .
SO,  what you're saying is that Turnbull is a lefty, he believes, so does most of the Liberal party, are they all leftys?

[quote author=grendel link=1249081176/75#86 date=1250725449]
oh dear...

Climate change is a natural phenomenon.
Man-made emissions causing catastrophic climate change is a at best debateable.
There is no proof that the current world climate conditions are outside the natural range of variability or that man is causing it.
The politics comes into it when people like Gore and other Progs...  ie progressive Left people use it as a method of pushing an agenda.
Gore's belief is based on the opinions of one of his old  school teachers.  
The Inconvenient Truth was a propaganda piece pushing his beliefs.
The UN now largely controlled by the Progs...  and other unsavoury representatives...  have an agenda that has very little to do with the environment.  This is again where the politics come into it.
The handful... sorry 10 handfuls of people on the IPCC  panel are not all climate experts some in fact in the original group that were left in disgust.

[/quote
LIAR, read the first post, the one written by 15 of Australia's climate change experts ,they address every denialist confusionalist point you raise and dismiss them as wrong.
Why don't you just learn to read what the experts say instead of the confusionalists? you wouldn't look so stupid then.

Grendel wrote on Aug 22^nd, 2009 at 7:15pm:



That's what you do.
Like most people in the world I base my opinions on the facts presented to me by the experts.You, on the other hand prefer to base your opinions on the propaganda peddled by individuals and organisations who clearly have ulterior motives.