Australian Politics Forum

skippy Ex Member	Re: 4 conclusions Reply #60 - Aug 9^th, 2009 at 1:54pm Grendel wrote on Aug 9^th, 2009 at 10:19am: No I'm just not an ignorant alarmist like you Skippeeeee. How can I be an ignorant alarmist when all I post are facts released by the expert mainstream scientific community? Are you saying the mainstream science community are ignorant alarmists now?
Back to top	IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #61 - Aug 9^th, 2009 at 4:29pm

I think he's saying that practically every government in the world and every scientific body of national or international significance are all alarmists.

It's amazing how the brainwashing has got through to the general population- As effective as the 'smoking is good for you' campaigns of the mid to late 20th century.

There are actually people around who still believe that too:

http://johnquiggin.com/index.php/archives/2006/04/23/credibility-up-in-smoke/

Lindzen clearly relishes the role of naysayer. He’ll even expound on how weakly lung cancer is linked to cigarette smoking. He speaks in full, impeccably logical paragraphs, and he punctuates his measured cadences with thoughtful drags on a cigarette.

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: 4 conclusions Reply #62 - Aug 9^th, 2009 at 5:01pm No you don't Skippeeee.. however it's now apparent you don't know what a FACT is. Hello Bozo... can't say you've been missed. Starting off with a bit of irrelevant character assassination are we? How unusual.
Back to top	IP Logged

skippy

Ex Member

Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #63 - Aug 9^th, 2009 at 6:11pm

Grendel wrote on Aug 9^th, 2009 at 5:01pm:

No you don't Skippeeee.. however it's now apparent you don't know what a FACT is.

Hello Bozo... can't say you've been missed. Starting off with a bit of irrelevant character assassination are we? How unusual.

LIAR, this very thread I started is about fifteen experts on climate change, yet you boo hoo their facts, the facts believed by the great majority of scientists and the population. Thank your fictional god that most people seem to understand the crisis a lot better than you do boooooofeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Back to top

IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: 4 conclusions Reply #64 - Aug 9^th, 2009 at 6:46pm I haven't lied about anything so far Skippeeee... Does that upset you? Oh dear, sinking to religious abuse now... flame away Troll... You have no credibility.
Back to top	IP Logged

mozzaok

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #65 - Aug 10^th, 2009 at 2:41am

denialists just can't make up their?, whatever passes for a mind behind those dull glazed eyes.

First we see them saying there is no warming, that we are in fact cooling.lol

Then they say we warming, but it is all mother natures fault, and we have nothing to do with it.

The fact that they can swing back and forth between such ridiculous positions, on an almost weekly basis, shows what cretinous goobers they really are.

In fact they will soon need to consult the kama sutra to find more bizarre positions to try.

Back to top

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!

IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: 4 conclusions Reply #66 - Aug 10^th, 2009 at 12:19pm I'm sorry... you are talking historically and accurately about the alarmist camp. You left out dimming though. You are sounding awfully shrill again Mozz. try a valium.
Back to top	IP Logged

skippy

Ex Member

Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #67 - Aug 10^th, 2009 at 12:30pm

Quote:

This article was written by Michael Raupach and John Church, CSIRO; David Griggs, Amanda Lynch and Neville Nicholls, Monash University; Nathan Bindoff, Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Co-operative Research Centre; Matthew England and Andy Pitman, University of NSW; Ann Henderson-Sellers and Lesley Hughes, Macquarie University; Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, University of Queensland; Roger Jones, Victoria University; David Karoly, University of Melbourne; and Tony McMichael and Will Steffen, Australian National University

I think you'll find these people are experts on climate change, not alarmists.
The sad thing is they put it all in simple English so even the likes of you could understand it booofeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, but alas, even that seems beyond you.

Back to top

IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: 4 conclusions Reply #68 - Aug 10^th, 2009 at 1:03pm I think you'll find many people in your camp have been wrong before and will be wrong again. Your point is ridiculous. My reply at the beginning states my position and your irrelevance to the debate. Flame away ratbag... it s not worrying me.
Back to top	IP Logged

skippy

Ex Member

Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #69 - Aug 10^th, 2009 at 1:12pm

Grendel wrote on Aug 10^th, 2009 at 1:03pm:

I think you'll find many people in your camp have been wrong before and will be wrong again.

Your point is ridiculous.

My reply at the beginning states my position and your irrelevance to the debate.

Flame away ratbag... it s not worrying me.

Haven't you ever considered that your small minority opinion might be wrong? . Roll Eyes

You have no point.
Give up on the " I'm a victim routine" , you don't fool anybody but yourself.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Aug 10^th, 2009 at 1:39pm by N/A »

IP Logged

skippy

Ex Member

Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #70 - Aug 10^th, 2009 at 1:37pm

Climate change wont just wipe out islands in the pacific it will also inflict billions of dollars worth of damage to the Great Barrier Reef.

Quote:

Print August 10, 2009
Article from: Australian Associated Press
CLIMATE change will inflict more than $37 billion worth of damage to the Great Barrier Reef over the next century, a report has found.

The Oxford Economics report, commissioned by the Great Barrier Reef Foundation, put the economic cost of permanent coral bleaching to the reef at $37.7bn.

The report placed the entire value of the reef, regarded as one of the world's greatest natural wonders, to the Australian economy at $51.4bn.

It claims as many as 50 per cent of tourists who would normally visit coral sites on the reef would stay away if widespread permanent bleaching occurred.

The worst affected area would be the tourism hub of Cairns where, the report claims, coral bleaching would deliver a $16.3bn blow to the local economy.

Great Barrier Reef Foundation CEO Judy Stewart said the report should serve as a wake-up call on the importance of protecting the reef.

"While it may alarm some people, its key message is that if we value the reef at all, we must do all in our power to preserve it as well as the neighbouring communities that benefit from it,'' Ms Stewart said.

"We are at a crossroads. We need to act now.

"While we acknowledge that reducing emissions globally is fundamental to the reef's future, we must also develop the solutions and adaptation strategies which will directly address the impacts of climate change impacts which are already being felt.''

Back to top

IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #71 - Aug 10^th, 2009 at 3:30pm

I'm not a victim, but you are a rude vile creton.

Stop lying and carrying on.

You keep bringing up spurious argument.

Who cares if you quote 15 people I can quote that many and more.

You just ignore them and even when named etc you say they are "faceless" ROTFLMAO Cheesy

You toss up alarmist claims about countries going underwater global devastation... OMG and you don't think that is alarmist Cheesy

You seem to think all this will happen due to man made CO2 emissions... yet there is NO definitive proof this is the case. Cheesy

You believe every scrap of alarmist propaganda pushed at you... Roll Eyes

Not because you know anything, but because this is the only religion to which you belong.

Back to top

IP Logged

skippy

Ex Member

Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #72 - Aug 10^th, 2009 at 3:57pm

Quote:

I'm not a victim, but you are a rude vile creton.

Stop lying and carrying on.

.

No lies here, all my posts are from the mainstream climate change experts, you're wrong again.

Quote:

You keep bringing up spurious argument.

Who cares if you quote 15 people I can quote that many and more

No spurious arguments here booofffeeeeeee, you just hate the truth, it doesn't fit your confusionalist agenda.
Those 15 people that you boo hoo are considered 15 of the top experts in climate change in Australia, but you know better than them. Roll Eyes

Quote:

You toss up alarmist claims about countries going underwater global devastation

They are ,in fact some people have already had to start leaving their homes.(see story I posted on Pacific nations flooding). Roll Eyes

Quote:

but because this is the only religion to which you belong.

Liar, I'm an atheist.i

Back to top

« Last Edit: Aug 10^th, 2009 at 4:08pm by N/A »

IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #73 - Aug 10^th, 2009 at 4:17pm

Everything you say about me is wrong for starters Skippeeee.

I'm not wasting any more time with you.

You are clueless, you have no idea what I think or believe even though it's been posted ad nauseum on this site.

You ignore those that dissent from your eco-religious belief in global warming/cooling/dimming/warming/climate-change. Even though they are also top people in the climate field and others.

DWMT Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

skippy

Ex Member

Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #74 - Aug 10^th, 2009 at 4:23pm

Grendel wrote on Aug 10^th, 2009 at 4:17pm:

Everything you say about me is wrong for starters Skippeeee.

I'm not wasting any more time with you.

You are clueless, you have no idea what I think or believe even though it's been posted ad nauseum on this site.

You ignore those that dissent from your eco-religious belief in global warming/cooling/dimming/warming/climate-change. Even though they are also top people in the climate field and others.

DWMT Roll Eyes

Your problem is that you throw a little hissy fit every time someone disagrees with your crazy beliefs.
Now if you cant add anything to this debate other than trolling and name calling, DWMT. Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged