Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7
Send Topic Print
4 conclusions (Read 13650 times)
skippy
Ex Member


Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #30 - Aug 3rd, 2009 at 12:36pm
 
Grendel wrote on Aug 3rd, 2009 at 12:24pm:
I'm sorry Mozz... DIDN'T YOU READ THE UN IPCC QUOTE.
OR IS IT JUST THAT YOU DIDN'T UNDERSTAND IT.

Alarmist propaganda Skipeeeee....  get back to me in 20 years with a list of all those countries underwater due to climate change and not just because they decided to live in a flood prone area.



Thats your best work yet, boofy thinks all these pacific islands under threat of going under water were somehow towed to their current position,and as boof puts it "they decided to live  in a flood prone area"
I'd blame their parents for having them on the island that has been their home for who knows how many years. Shocked Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #31 - Aug 3rd, 2009 at 12:46pm
 
Hate to tell you this Skipeeeee but sea levels change all the time and Island appear and disappear for many reasons.

I note the surface area of the planet has changed many many times and none of it was due to man made CO2 emissions.

I await your list in 20 years.
BTW I think it will be a very short one.

"All these Pacific Islands"...  got a list?

Perhaps they should contact the Dutch eh...  
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
skippy
Ex Member


Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #32 - Aug 3rd, 2009 at 1:10pm
 
Quote:
"All these Pacific Islands"...  got a list?

As a matter of fact I can show you how its already happening , here is a story from just last week.


First climate refugees start move to new island home
The Carteret Islands.

Adam Morton
July 29, 2009
IMAGINE that your home, water and a fair whack of your food are under threat. Imagine it is only going to get worse.

Imagine that you live on the Carteret Islands, seven tiny coral atolls in the Pacific that have been described as the home of the world’s first climate change refugees.

Six months ago, the 2700 islanders began what will eventually become a big evacuation to Bougainville, about 80 kilometres to the south.

The decision to relocate followed years of worsening storm surges and king tides that infected the fresh water supply and ruined the islanders’ staple banana and taro crops.

Fearing worse is to come — more frequent floods are expected to be the most visible signs of rising sea levels due to global warming — the islanders secured three blocks of coastal land. Five men moved earlier this year to build houses and plant crops, the first step in the relocation of 1700 people in the next five years.

The relocation is being headed by Ursula Rakova, an islander who quit a job with Oxfam in Bougainville three years ago to set up Tulele Peisa, an organisation that raises money and campaigns for social justice on behalf of her people. ‘‘We have a feeling of anxiety, a feeling of uncertainty because we know that we will be losing our homes. It is our identity. It is our whole culture at stake,’’ she said in Melbourne yesterday.

The move has been helped by the Catholic Church, which provided the land for relocation, but not the Bougainville Government.

Ms Rakova said the $1 million provided by the Papua New Guinea Government in Port Moresby had been swallowed by provincial bureaucrats.

The purpose of her trip to Australia this week is two-fold — to secure a market for the organic cocoa the islanders plan to grow at their new home and to call on the Australian Government, through its AusAID program, to pressure the Bougainville Government to deliver the promised money.

Just as urgently, she wants to see Western leaders take on much deeper cuts in greenhouse gas emissions.

The Australian Government’s most ambitious emissions proposal of stabilising atmospheric carbon dioxide at 450 parts per million was not enough to give the Pacific a safe future, she said.

‘‘We are angry. Some people do not understand the science, but they know they are losing their homes and they are angry they are having to pay for what other people [in industrialised nations] have done,’’ she said.

While climate scientists warn that the future for atolls like the Carterets is bleak, the extent to which climate change is responsible for their current predicament is unclear.

Campaigners believe the impact of rising sea levels may have been amplified by the gradual sinking of an extinct volcano that supports the atolls.

One of the world’s leading sea level experts yesterday called for caution. John Hunter, from the University of Tasmania, said sea level rises would eventually cause ‘‘huge problems’’, and called for the building of sea walls to protect the islands’ culture and ‘‘buy a few more decades’’
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
skippy
Ex Member


Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #33 - Aug 3rd, 2009 at 1:17pm
 
You don't have to wait twenty years boowhofee I've already started compiling it for you.
Don't bother thanking me, it was my pleasure.

November 10, 2008 4:17 PM
Five nations under threat from climate change
"The first line of coconut trees has disappeared" - Kiribati inhabitant

While the world dithers about tackling climate change, in some parts of the world people are running out of time. In Florida sea level rises can be worked around to some extent - condos can be put on stilts and moved away from the shoreline. But on some islands you can only move back so far before you have to start worrying about the water at your back door as well as the water in front.

Here are five islands whose inhabitants are going to need a new home soon:

1. The Guardian reports today that the new president of the Maldives will be putting part of the country's profits from tourism into a very special - and unusual - fund: one that will be used to buy a new, climate-change-friendly home. With its highest point reaching only 2.4 metres, the Maldives is one of the lowest-lying nations in the world and risks being submerged by rising sea-levels.

2. Tuvalu is another small pacific island state, and after the Maldives the second-lowest nation in the world. At its highest, it is 5 metres above sea-level and could be gone by the middle of this century. In 2002, the government was said to have hired two international law firms to look into suing polluting nations for effectively evicting its citizens.
3. Kiribati is a group of 32 atols and one island that peaks at 6.5 metres above sea-level. The World Bank has been involved in assessing the nation's vulnerability to climate change. I attended a talk by one of the project leaders some years ago in Paris. She quoted a few of the changes which the islanders were noticing. The one that has always stuck with me was "the first line of coconut trees has disappeared". Salt-intrusion was killing off the trees that were closest to the water.

4. The inhabitants of the Carteret Islands of Papua New Guinea may be among the first climate refugees - their home lies just 1.2 metres above the waves. The government of Papua New Guinea adopted a plan in 2005 to evacuate the locals to the neighbouring island of Bougainville. The relocation was initially scheduled for 2007, then delayed. According to this report, there was a trial earlier this year, which created some tension as relocated citizens were used as labourers in coconut plantations on Bougainville.

5. In 1995, 500,000 inhabitants on Bangladesh's Bhola Island were forced to move in when half their island was permanently flooded. Some claim they were the first climate refugees. Scientists predict that 20 million Bangladeshis could suffer the same fate by 2030
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
skippy
Ex Member


Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #34 - Aug 4th, 2009 at 8:14am
 
Boofeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, where are you son? I've gone and got all this info for you and you scatoodle, feeling a bit silly hey?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #35 - Aug 5th, 2009 at 1:38pm
 
Wow that is some list...  you believe all this alarmist nonsense eh Skippeeeeee.

Sorry you missed me Skippeeeeeeeeee....  but if it don't show in recent when I logon I don't see it.

Adam Morton... Grin  UN lapdog.

CO2 emissions do not effect King Tides etc.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

LOL  "The Guardian"  LW PC rag.

Quite an obscure list your developing there.

Better watch out, Australia is an Island too you know  Cheesy

Now let me let you in on a secret.  
The world as we know it has been used to much higher sea levels.
Oh and guess what...  it wasn't due to man-made CO2 emissions.

pssst...  no one should live in Bangladesh...  it's always been a flood plain.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
skippy
Ex Member


Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #36 - Aug 5th, 2009 at 1:42pm
 
how disappointing bofeee, two days and that's the best you could come up with. I suppose seeing as tho I've shown you up as being wrong grates at you, but hey, I'm used to it. Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #37 - Aug 5th, 2009 at 1:45pm
 
The ignorant are usually disappointed, when the truth is so simple.

Cant debate, cant debate... eh Skipeee..
Took me 1 minute BTW. I had to google Morton.

You do know what a river delta is don't you Skipeeeeeee?  Cheesy
Do you know what a swamp is?

How about you post some proof about your alarmist claims and show how what is happening isn't just part of nature.

I won't be waiting for that BTW.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 5th, 2009 at 2:40pm by Grendel »  
 
IP Logged
 
skippy
Ex Member


Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #38 - Aug 5th, 2009 at 2:12pm
 
Grendel wrote on Aug 5th, 2009 at 1:45pm:
Cant debate, cant debate... eh Skipeee..
Took me 1 minute BTW. I had to google Morton.

You do know what a river delta is don't you Skipeeeeeee?  Cheesy
Do you know what a swamp is?

How about you post some proof about your alarmist claims and show how what is happening isn't just part of nature.

I won't be waiting for that BTW.


Boofeeee boofee boofeee, you're looking silly mate, you asked me for proof pacific islands were in danger of flooding , see below-

Quote:
"All these Pacific Islands"...  got a list?


I've actually provided a list and in fact went even further and showed you an article from just last week showing that these people are already being moved to other places.
There are plenty of articles on the net about low laying islands at threat of going under because of seas rising due to ice caps melting due to the climate warming, you should try and google a few of those and get yourself better educated son.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #39 - Aug 5th, 2009 at 2:57pm
 
ROTFLMAO
Quote:
you asked me for proof pacific islands were in danger of flooding

Actually no Skippeeeeeeeee
That's not what I asked you at all.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

This is what I actually said...

Quote:
get back to me in 20 years with a list of all those countries underwater due to climate change and not just because they decided to live in a flood prone area.


You then mentioned "Pacific Islands..."  you know little islands surrounded by water and you list atolls and low lying islands and Bangladesh...  a low lying flood prone flood plain, part delta/part swamp.

then I asked you for a list...  and even then you come up with a handful out of some 30,000 islands.  Grin

Pssst I would never live in Bangladesh.  I wouldn't even live in parts of Windsor just a few Ks from here.  It's flood prone too.

Skippeeeeeeee...  the only one who thinks you have an argument is you.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
skippy
Ex Member


Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #40 - Aug 5th, 2009 at 3:01pm
 
You go on believing that booofeee, the only person you're fooling is yourself. Roll Eyes Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
skippy
Ex Member


Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #41 - Aug 5th, 2009 at 3:08pm
 
Roll Eyes
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 5th, 2009 at 3:13pm by N/A »  
 
IP Logged
 
skippy
Ex Member


Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #42 - Aug 5th, 2009 at 5:14pm
 
Grendel wrote on Aug 5th, 2009 at 2:57pm:
ROTFLMAO
Quote:
you asked me for proof pacific islands were in danger of flooding

Actually no Skippeeeeeeeee
That's not what I asked you at all.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

This is what I actually said...

Quote:
get back to me in 20 years with a list of all those countries underwater due to climate change and not just because they decided to live in a flood prone area.


You then mentioned "Pacific Islands..."  you know little islands surrounded by water and you list atolls and low lying islands and Bangladesh...  a low lying flood prone flood plain, part delta/part swamp.

then I asked you for a list...  and even then you come up with a handful out of some 30,000 islands.  Grin

Pssst I would never live in Bangladesh.  I wouldn't even live in parts of Windsor just a few Ks from here.  It's flood prone too.

Skippeeeeeeee...  the only one who thinks you have an argument is you.


Well you might be able to try and squirm out of what you said but dont make up lies about what I said and when. I brought up the pacific islands and their refugees a few posts before your post about getting back to you in twenty years. If ya gunna lie ol fella cover your tracks.

Quote:
many of the climate change refugees will end up coming here as their pacific island nations flood.


I was clearly discussing pacific islands, nice try.

And then you of course also said this ,didn't YOU?

Quote:
All these Pacific Islands"...  got a list?





Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 5th, 2009 at 5:23pm by N/A »  
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #43 - Aug 5th, 2009 at 7:18pm
 
I already provided quotes thanks Skippeeeeee  do try to address the issue and stop obsessing you bore me.

Oh and Skippeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee....

tsk tsk tsk... lying by omission again..

here's the first part of what you said
(The bit I first commented on BTW)
Quote:
You should tell that to the people living in countries that wont exist in twenty years because they'll be under water.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 5th, 2009 at 7:25pm by Grendel »  
 
IP Logged
 
skippy
Ex Member


Re: 4 conclusions
Reply #44 - Aug 6th, 2009 at 8:40am
 
I hope you're finished trying to hijack my topic with your usual bile and lies boooffeeeeeeeeee.
So fifteen of Australia's most experienced climate change experts have put it into black and white for the confusionalists yet we still get confusionalists boo hooing these experts, the question needs to be asked, why do they do this? I suspect many of them have  motives that are far from genuine, many work in the industries that will suffer when clean power is introduced so they are thinking of themselves not their children's future.
we shouldn't let these confusionalists damage our children's future with their lies and attempts to hijack the very real threat that climate warming is.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7
Send Topic Print