Quote:But those article don't quote environmentalists, they quote scientists,you said it was a GREEN conspiracy, were you and grendel lying when you said global cooling was a Greenie thing?
So ,what you are now trying to say is that the scientists were right about global cooling but are lying about global warming?
You seem confused.
Confused (and therefore suspicious) is correct. Here's just one articulation of the reasons:
"So, Antarctic cooling and warming are both now consistent with computer models of dreaded global warming caused by humans.
In reality, the warming is largely at the beginning of the record – before there should have been much human-induced climate change. New claims that both warming and cooling of the same place are consistent with forecasts isn't going to help the credibility of climate science, and, or reduce the fatigue of Americans regarding global warming.
Have climate alarmists beaten global warming to death? The Pew Research Centre recently asked over 1,500 people to rank 20 issues in order of priority. Global warming came in dead last.
We can never run the experiment to see if indeed it is the constant hyping of this issue that has sent it to the bottom of the priority ladder. But, as long as scientists blog on that
both warming and cooling of the coldest place on earth is consistent with their computer models, why should anyone believe them?"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/feb/06/antarctic-warming...