Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
The Questions the Alarmists couldn't answer. (Read 5618 times)
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: The Questions the Alarmists couldn't answer.
Reply #30 - Jul 3rd, 2009 at 9:03am
 
ROTFLMAO

Coy? Well I was trying to be nice.

So when are you actually going to say something....  hmmm...  worthwhile?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: The Questions the Alarmists couldn't answer.
Reply #31 - Jul 3rd, 2009 at 9:07am
 
Grendel wrote on Jul 3rd, 2009 at 9:03am:
ROTFLMAO

Coy? Well I was trying to be nice.

So when are you actually going to say something....  hmmm...  worthwhile?



You mean you didn't read part the first remark? Now why does that not surprise me?
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: The Questions the Alarmists couldn't answer.
Reply #32 - Jul 3rd, 2009 at 9:20am
 
ROTFLMAO...

You are such a blowhard...  and disappointment.
You are going to have to try much harder.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: The Questions the Alarmists couldn't answer.
Reply #33 - Jul 3rd, 2009 at 9:29am
 
Grendel wrote on Jul 3rd, 2009 at 9:20am:
ROTFLMAO...

You are such a blowhard...  and disappointment.
You are going to have to try much harder.


I don't even need to try. You're the one who is going to have to do all the work considering that since 2007 no scientific body of national or international standing has maintained a dissenting opinion on the anthropogenic contribution to Climate Change.

The onus of proof is on you, Grendel. You're the one who is going to have to do the 'hard work'.

Hmm - Did you ever read about the legend of Sisyphus? You seem to like legends.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: The Questions the Alarmists couldn't answer.
Reply #34 - Jul 3rd, 2009 at 10:12am
 
Oh right hang on I'll collect my apparatus and get onto it right away.

Bozo...

You make the claim the onus of proof is on you.

You have no proof just a theory and models which have so far failed dismally.  Stop being so disingenuous.

No one I know says climate change doesn't occur.
No one I know says there is no such thing as the greenhouse effect.
No one I know says CO2 and other greenhouse gasses don't contibute to warming and a habitable climate.

Oh dear...  strawman all fall down.

YOU need to prove that man made CO2 or what ever you like to call it is going to produce catastophic warming.  

You need to prove that it is the primary driver of whatever you are calling it these days.  

You need to prove that by stopping man made emissions of CO2 that whatever disaster is going to happen will be averted.

Etc, etc, etc....  think you can do that?

Oh and if you can ever find the answers perhaps you'd like to answer all the questions already quoted here.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: The Questions the Alarmists couldn't answer.
Reply #35 - Jul 3rd, 2009 at 10:40am
 
[quote ]
Oh and if you can ever find the answers perhaps you'd like to answer all the questions already quoted here. [/quote]

I have answered all your questions ad nauseum. Here's a link to a site that has all the information that you need to come up to speed.

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/index.htm

First show me that you'll attempt to understand the basics and then I'll answer your questions.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: The Questions the Alarmists couldn't answer.
Reply #36 - Jul 3rd, 2009 at 11:03am
 
Sorry...  that was a lie..  do try harder.

BTW I have already read all IPCC reports as they are made available to the public.  I have even read the dissenting reports on the reports and the opinions of those who helped create them and their complaints about misinterpretation and misrepresentation and misquoting. (From the very first report)  If you base something on a false premise you are lying to yourself.  Unfortunately they've been lying to everybody.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: The Questions the Alarmists couldn't answer.
Reply #37 - Jul 3rd, 2009 at 11:11am
 
Oh  really - Actually I always knew that those guys at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology were lying.

It's all one big conspiracy to catch us in the rain without an umbrella.  Grin

Weather forecasting is all funded by the.... hair dryer and ....laundry powder manufacturers. It's all one big conspiracy.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: The Questions the Alarmists couldn't answer.
Reply #38 - Jul 3rd, 2009 at 11:52am
 
You do yourself no favours by being an idiot Bozo
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: The Questions the Alarmists couldn't answer.
Reply #39 - Jul 3rd, 2009 at 12:02pm
 
Now you're going to plead ignorance which in turn is just denial..

here...  

http://www.climatedepot.com/a/611/UN-IPCC-Scientist-No-convincing-scientific-arguments-to-support-claim-that-increases-in-greenhouse-gases-are-harmful-to-the-climate

http://www.warwickhughes.com/icecore/
Quote:
Conclusion

The basis of most of the IPCC conclusions on anthropogenic causes and on projections of climatic change is the assumption of low level of CO2 in the pre-industrial atmosphere. This assumption, based on glaciological studies, is false. Therefore IPCC projections should not be used for national and global economic planning. The climatically inefficient and economically disastrous Kyoto Protocol, based on IPCC projections, was correctly defined by President George W. Bush as “fatally flawed”. This criticism was recently followed by the President of Russia Vladimir V. Putin. I hope that their rational views might save the world from enormous damage that could be induced by implementing recommendations based on distorted science.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 3rd, 2009 at 12:11pm by Grendel »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print