Calanen wrote on Jun 18
th, 2009 at 2:16pm:
You were saying that all other ideologies were not required etc, and I wanted to focus in on the only one that is a significant threat - Islam and why it is.
Less ideologies and more peoples, but yes. Generally speaking mass immigration from any Third World population is a significant threat. I will grant you that Muslims are perhaps the worst Third World immigrants the West has thus far received.
Calanen wrote on Jun 18
th, 2009 at 2:16pm:
I admire Islam like I admire smallpox or botulinum. Just recognise its destructiveness, but want it eradicated nonetheless.
You want it eradicated? I certainly want it eradicated from the West, but do you really care about their own rubbish countries?
Calanen wrote on Jun 18
th, 2009 at 2:16pm:
It's not reductio ad absurdum at all. I'm very familiar with both the Third Reich and Islam. I would say why, but the manic Helian would add it to his "ID Calanen file' so, I'll take the 5th on that. But the insane hatred of Jews, the requirement to rule over all others, the fact that all others are inferior to the superior muslims - very very similar outlooks.
Anti-semitism in Europe was not some kind of insane movement, but one based on typical material resentment and secondarily on the disproportionate involvement of Jews in negative radical politics, such as communism. Granted, the Nazis..."excelled" in anti-semitism to the point of insanity.
Nazism did not posit a requirement to rule over all others, quite unlike Islam. Nazism in fact presented an orderly continuation of long-standing German geopolitical goals of eastern expansion, the reason for which was quite clear from Germany's geography.
Lastly, Nazi supremacist ideology was predicated on Nordicism, which of course is exclusive and hereditary. Islamic supremacism is predicated on a religious-social system that can be adapted by anyone. A Slav can't become an "Aryan", but anyone can become a Muslim.
Calanen wrote on Jun 18
th, 2009 at 2:16pm:
No, let's forget all of that as more moral relativist rubbish. We have a problem with Islam, not the Kali cult.
What moral relativism? I was describing a despicable practice in another culture.
Calanen wrote on Jun 18
th, 2009 at 2:16pm:
Comparaitvely few problems with muslims? Have you seen how many have been arrested in terror plots? You have few general law and order problems with muslims (like violent demonstrations), because America strikes hard in law and order so anyone that pokes their head up is squashed quickly - also the populace in the US would stand for it like the polite Swedes do. What about all the Holy Land Foundation trial? And these are what, some insignicant percentage of the entire population? 9/11? The attempt to overrun a US Army base?
Terrorism is a nuisance. Bad as 9-11 was, it's nothing that threatens to dispossess us from our nation or cause mass destruction or suffering. We all know of course that Muslims are significantly more likely to commit acts of terrorism against us and that's one of many reasons they shouldn't be here.
Calanen wrote on Jun 18
th, 2009 at 2:16pm:
Blacks are disorganised rabble,
Precisely, and they blame us for it. They commit half the murders in the country and consume huge amounts of public resources.
Calanen wrote on Jun 18
th, 2009 at 2:16pm:
and whatever Mexicans might be - they are Catholics. They are not going to strap a bomb to themselves and ride the subway.
This is a Protestant nation, not a Catholic one. Catholicism is better than Islam, far better, but we have far too many Papists here already. Mexicans are also predominantly non-white and once here display similar levels of social disorder to blacks. Unlike Muslims, Mexicans threaten to dispossess us from our own homeland due to their sheer numbers. This is our number one threat in the way Muslims are to Europe.
Calanen wrote on Jun 18
th, 2009 at 2:16pm:
To say there is any other problem in the US, does not lessen the problem, the huge problem with Islam.
The most important problem is that people are not even free to discuss the problem.
Protected by the First Amendment here--for now.
Calanen wrote on Jun 18
th, 2009 at 2:16pm:
Islam is the only culture that can destroy the US economy. A few well timed terror attacks spread acrosss the country and its all over. You'd only need 50 or so people and a few million dollars. They've tried again and again, and the FBI has always caught them. One day it will not.
Neither Pearl Harbor nor 9-11 destroyed our economy. A catastrophic stock market crash is ultimately a temporary event, even if bad, as the Panic of 1893 and the Great Depression showed. If we didn't have a fiat currency then there would also be far less scope for harm. The only country that can destroy our economy besides us is Russia, as they can quite literally destroy all our physical resources.
Calanen wrote on Jun 18
th, 2009 at 2:16pm:
And the millions being raised in US mosques for terror. Already, muslims have angrily been asking for assurances that mosques will NEVER be bugged by the FBI, and probably Mr Hopey Changey man will give them that assurance.
We'll see. Bush once made similar promises.