Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 13
Send Topic Print
Multiculti death of Australian National Identity (Read 20760 times)
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Jun 10th, 2009 at 8:21pm
 
ASSIMILATION, THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL IDENTITY, AND THE MULTICULTURALIST LOBBIES

Multiculturalists oppose the idea of assimilation (whereby immigrants would be encouraged to become Australian) as they want immigrants to retain their own cultures and pass those cultures onto successive generations. While it is understandable that immigrants would have an attachment to their place of birth and native culture, assimilation does not demand that immigrants should forget their origins; but asks that they, and their offspring, become part of Australia and adapt to the Australian culture and way of life; rather than give impetus to ghettos and ethnic divisions within the country.

Multiculturalism, however, demands that immigrants remain attached to their place of birth and native culture. In fact, this demand even extends to the offspring of immigrants: people born in Australia, of immigrant parentage, are told not to join "mainstream" Australian culture, but to become multicultural "ethnics".

Multiculturalism is a political policy to actively encourage the strengthening, building, and promotion of separate cultural units within Australia. Multiculturalism is a political device to discourage immigrants, and their offspring, from becoming Australians.

The aim of internationalist-thinking liberals, academics, and "lefties" is - in effect - to destroy the Australian national and cultural identity. This "aim" is not the design of some well-organised conspiracy, but is rather the "logical" outcome of the thought-processes of liberal-internationalists, whose actions will cause such devastation; however, since these "trendies" are, or should be, well aware of the effects their policies will have on our national culture, their actions can only be regarded as deliberate. This intended destruction of the Australian identity is being carried out by a two pronged attack:

Firstly, the Australian identity is denied. Many academics, trendies and "lefties" maintain that Australia does not have its own national and cultural identity. They argue that Australian culture is either "British", or a multicultural mish-mash; they tell us that Australia has no culture of its own.

Ignored are the poets like Henry Lawson, Banjo Paterson, Rex Ingamells, and Mary Gilmore; painters like Arthur Streeton, Frederick McCubbin, Sydney Nolan, and Russell Drysdale; architecture such as the Federation style; music from Waltzing Matilda, to the Seekers, to the Bushwhackers, to Skyhooks; our heroes and heroines, for instance, Ned Kelly, Nellie Melba, Don Bradman, the ANZACs, and the men of the Kokoda Track; the Australian way of life, including the bush barbeque, Australian Rules Football, and games of Two-Up; Australian icons such as Vegemite, Goanna Oil, Hills Hoists, and Akubra hats; our entertainers and characters like Ginger Meggs, Chips Rafferty, Paul Hogan, Dame Edna Everage and Sir Les Patterson; our distinctive language, accent, and colloquialisms; the Australian character, styled as easy-going, fair and democratic, having a healthy disrespect for authority, and with a laconic humour; all shaped and influenced by the distinctive Australian landscape and our unique history.(10)

Secondly, the destruction of our identity is being carried out by multiculturalism itself. From politicians and academics comes the cry "we are all ethnics", no-one is an actual Australian - everyone is an "ethnic". The origin of your parents or forebears dictates what type of "ethnic" you are: if you have English parents then you're an English "ethnic", if you have Irish parents then you're an Irish "ethnic", German parentage produces a German "ethnic", and so on. If one parent is French, and the other Russian, then it could be assumed that you have to pick just one ethnicity, or perhaps you could become a multicultural schizophrenic? Australia's culture is being undermined by the effects of the continual push for multiculturalism (especially in our educational institutions); we are now being taught to see ourselves as "ethnics", rather than Australians, and this cannot help but to adversely affect our national cultural output and development.

The aim of this two-pronged attack is simple: no more Australians! Everyone becomes an "ethnic"; and the Australian identity and culture becomes treated as worthless and second-class, or gets twisted around to take on a multicultural slant. This destructive "aim" is the consequence of the actions of liberalistic internationalists of various shades; and, even if such destruction is not their actual intent, their ideology certainly manifests itself as an assault on our national well-being.(11)

As Loring M. Danforth, a Professor of Anthropology, has stated, "Multiculturalism, with its emphasis on community languages and ethnic media, promotes the development of these ethnic identities and impedes the development of a strong Australian national identity."(12) However, rather than being just an impediment, the long term results are actually destructive of the Australian national identity.

pt1
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Reply #1 - Jun 10th, 2009 at 8:23pm
 
pt 2

If this attack on Australia's heritage was being carried out by liberals, academics, and "lefties" only in their capacity as private individuals or groups, then we would not have too much to worry about as they are a minority opinion on the subject. But this is not how these people operate. They lobby and push their ideas through academia, the media, and the political machines; their ideas are then shoved into official acceptance, until they finally become "official policy". Once the "official policy" stage is reached, these lobbyists go into "overdrive"; "official policy" becomes the rationale to enable them to force their ideas onto the community: the public service is retrained and restructured to accommodate the new ideas; a veritable public service "industry" is created to build, promote, and propagate their ideology, encroaching as far as possible into other public service areas, as well as into private enterprise, and even affecting private individuals, becoming a self-serving, self-sustaining industry hell-bent on pushing its new ideology and justifying itself (they begin to wonder how we ever got along without them). In tandem with all this is the creation of new laws (enacted by self-serving politicians, assisted by the new "Multicultural Industry" and their allies) which sets up the new ideology as "right" and "respectable", whilst painting any opposing views as "wrong", "unworthy" and, in certain circumstances, "illegal". The new policy has now become "politically correct"; and with the media, academia, and the parliamentary political parties being full of small "l" liberals, the public receives the impression that such views are not only "correct", but are held by the majority of the people (when, in fact, these ideas are held only by the majority of journalists, academics, and politicians). In such a climate, it then becomes "politically incorrect" to hold opposing views, with active opponents being effectively labelled as cranks, if not downright criminals ("racial vilification" laws will see some opponents jailed and/or scared off). Opponents in prominent positions are harassed; while those in the public service, self-employment, or any other assailable position, stand to lose their job or livelihood if they speak out.

The most serious aspect of all this is that of education. It is during the formative years of our young children that they are heavily indoctrinated by the education system into believing in multiculturalism (such indoctrination being made by both subtle means and overt means). No opposing viewpoints are given any credible airing (if given any "airing" at all), and multiculturalism is presented as a fact, rather than as a particular biased political viewpoint. As in the days of Galileo Galilei, our school children now believe that "the sun revolves around the earth", and that it is "dangerous heresy" to believe otherwise; in our modern context, that "multiculturalism is good for us", and that to oppose it is "dangerous" and "wrong", perhaps even "illegal".

The ultimate aim of the internationalist liberals is to destroy the Australian national and cultural identity (whether this aim be deliberate or incidental). The general idea is that Australia will have no national identity of its own; that all of the population will be "ethnics" who owe their cultural allegiance to cultures all over the world; creating a situation where, en masse, the people will be loyal to all nations and, paradoxically, will therefore be collectively loyal to none; that Australia will become an internationalist state (maybe even a building block, or a springboard, for an internationalist world). It would seem that Australia has become a multiculturalist experiment, as the place to create the United Nations' vision of the "brown man": a human creature belonging to no identifiable race, nation, or culture; the new citizen of the cosmopolitan internationalist multicultural world.

That most, if not all, multiculturalists are actually internationalists is beyond doubt. As an example, the government-sponsored document, Australia as a Multicultural Society, saw fit to propagate the belief that Australia's interests may have to be overridden by so-called international interests: "we also wish to emphasise that questions of immigration policy (like many other questions) are embedded in a much wider concept of social cohesion than this: namely, the `social good' of humanity as a whole. From this point of view, Australia may be a sectional group in a wider international system and the good of the wider system may override the well-being of Australia considered in isolation" (emphasis added).(13)

What began as a trendy liberalistic idea, and was picked up and carried along as a "migrant vote winner" for politicians, has become a huge menace to Australia's society and culture.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Reply #2 - Jun 10th, 2009 at 9:38pm
 
Quote:
While it is understandable that immigrants would have an attachment to their place of birth and native culture, assimilation does not demand that immigrants should forget their origins; but asks that they, and their offspring, become part of Australia and adapt to the Australian culture and way of life;


I don't know who determines the meanings of multiculturalism, and assimilation, but I believe that misunderstandings about these terms is a root cause for much unnecessary dispute in this whole debate.

The fact of the matter is that many anti-multiculturalists do not agree with the definition of assimilation quoted, many regard any loyalty to, or fondness for, a cultural or ethnic heritage, other than australian, is an act of disloyalty to australia.

If all people accepted the quoted definition then I would not expect that there would be much dissent at all, as it seems eminently fair and reasonable, and acceptable to australians, both new, and old.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Reply #3 - Jun 10th, 2009 at 9:52pm
 
Yss many who blindly accept multiculturalism have no idea what it's about.

Many people also confuse assimilation and intgration the 2 proceeding policies.

But no one can deny the reality of multiculturalism and the harm it does society and National culture.

how you can agree with anything that promotes this...

Multiculturalism, however, demands that immigrants remain attached to their place of birth and native culture. In fact, this demand even extends to the offspring of immigrants: people born in Australia, of immigrant parentage, are told not to join "mainstream" Australian culture, but to become multicultural "ethnics".

Multiculturalism is a political policy to actively encourage the strengthening, building, and promotion of separate cultural units within Australia. Multiculturalism is a political device to discourage immigrants, and their offspring, from becoming Australians.


is beyond me.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Calanen
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2241
Re: Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Reply #4 - Jun 10th, 2009 at 10:00pm
 
Quote:
But no one can deny the reality of multiculturalism and the harm it does society and National culture.


In one sense while it's merely annoying, the combination of global jihad plus multicultist dhimmitude is incredibly harmful. At the same time that Islam pushes for our destruction, multicultists teach us to be cowards and ashamed of who we are. What a calamitous combination that has brought us to the brink of ruin.

But nothing is inevitable. Once leftism and multicultism were just radical ideas, now they are mantras chanted by everyone. It can be different - people just have to want it.

I suspect the ordinary person knows something is wrong, they just don't know quite what. They just have to learn for things to be better. Australia would be a far better place, a far better place without the muslims that have been let in here. They fill our prisons, rape our women, now have brought us shame on the world stage by attacking Indians. Even the moderates just wait for the day when they can take over.

Again the multicultist state lets whites take the blame, as this is preferable to ever offending the muslims.

Talk to any coptic, any serb, any maronite catholic, any Nigerian christian, hell, any Jew - and they will describe Islam as a cancer. You do not know your society is unwell, until the cancer has spread and you are riddled with it. Then it is too late, your society is dead, and you are dead. We need to cut the cancer out now, before it is too late. And it will be too late, very soon.

The UK now has a Police force that is corrupted by muslims. A Parliament corrupted by Muslims. Courts corrupted by muslims, and even sharia courts now.  Islam will bring us nothing that can be of any assistance to a secular state, except an extreme supremacist ideology that will constantly work to disrupt, destroy, and negate anything good that could ever come of Australia.

Back to top
 

Quote:
ISLAM is a vicious [un-reformable] political tyranny, which has always murdered its critics, and it continues that practice even today.
Yadda
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Reply #5 - Jun 10th, 2009 at 10:10pm
 
Quote:
Multiculturalism, however, demands that immigrants remain attached to their place of birth and native culture. In fact, this demand even extends to the offspring of immigrants: people born in Australia, of immigrant parentage, are told not to join "mainstream" Australian culture, but to become multicultural "ethnics".

Multiculturalism is a political policy to actively encourage the strengthening, building, and promotion of separate cultural units within Australia. Multiculturalism is a political device to discourage immigrants, and their offspring, from becoming Australians.



Where does that come from?
That does not bear any resemblance to what I consider multiculturalism to mean.

The first quote about assimilation is far more accurate in describing what multicurlaism really means to most aussies.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Reply #6 - Jun 10th, 2009 at 10:14pm
 
yes but you've never got it right and close your eyes and ears to reality.

Even that well know socialist and scoial scientist from the left Putnam had to admit his 5 year study showed that diversity policy otherwise known as multiculturalism weakened a society by increasing disharmony and causing social withdrawal.

Assimilation is nothing like multiculturalism...  shows just how WRONG you are in your belief.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41243
Gender: male
Re: Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Reply #7 - Jun 10th, 2009 at 10:52pm
 
Calanen - multiculturalism IS inviting anyone else in to take over if they want.

In effect, the society is throwing their hands up in the air and saying "We don't know what to do, so anyone can come here."
No wonder it works well on a inferiority defeatist mentality.
Some would term that kind, "softcocks".
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Mercedes With Square Wheels
Ex Member


Re: Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Reply #8 - Jun 10th, 2009 at 10:55pm
 
Quote:
Even that well know socialist and scoial scientist from the left Putnam had to admit his 5 year study showed that diversity policy otherwise known as multiculturalism weakened a society by increasing disharmony and causing social withdrawal.


Indeed. Putnam initially was disgusted with the results of his experiment, deciding to hide it from view.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Calanen
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2241
Re: Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Reply #9 - Jun 10th, 2009 at 11:05pm
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 10th, 2009 at 10:52pm:
Calanen - multiculturalism IS inviting anyone else in to take over if they want.

In effect, the society is throwing their hands up in the air and saying "We don't know what to do, so anyone can come here."
No wonder it works well on a inferiority defeatist mentality.
Some would term that kind, "softcocks".


Massively. The disappointment I feel at how people just give in without any fight at all is perhaps the worst thing. If I only had to fight the muslims that would be bad enough, but I have to fight my own people who are pretending that the muslim problem isn't there? One day in a 100 years or so, people will pity us for our stupidity, if there is anyone left who is not a muslim to reflect upon it.

As has been said, history repeats itself because there was no one listening the first time. And in every single place that Islam has been introduced into a society, it has destroyed or attempted to destroy that society, for 1400 years.  All through the Middle East. All through Africa. In Europe for about 800 years all the way up to the Battle of Vienna when the Turks were defeated. Now, the Turks dont need to invade Vienna, they can move straight into Europe and take over whole suburbs.

As a colleague said to me at a recent meeting, it is not just the muslims we have to defeat - but our own leftist elites.  My vote is, that I don't want to have to live in the same society as a bunch of people who want to make me a dhimmi under their rule. Sorry if that seems a bit rude, but I have this aversion to slavery.
Back to top
 

Quote:
ISLAM is a vicious [un-reformable] political tyranny, which has always murdered its critics, and it continues that practice even today.
Yadda
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41243
Gender: male
Re: Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Reply #10 - Jun 10th, 2009 at 11:22pm
 

muslims are leaving that belief soon as they can.
Soon as people realise they CAN have freedoms and rights, they take them.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 22642
A cat with a view
Re: Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Reply #11 - Jun 11th, 2009 at 10:45am
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 10th, 2009 at 11:22pm:
muslims are leaving that belief soon as they can.

Soon as people realise they CAN have freedoms and rights, they take them.



Yes, some moslems are leaving ISLAM.



But, ISLAM is very appealing, and offers so much to the natural man.
  • sex on tap for the brothers,
  • self aggrandising power,
  • the more devout you portray yourself as, the more you are afforded 'respect' within your community,
  • the promise of hegemony over your perceived enemies.



ISLAM is very alluring, to the man of the flesh.

Who is 'the man of the flesh'?






"Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves. Thou (O Muhammad) seest them bowing and falling prostrate (in worship), seeking bounty from Allah and (His) acceptance. The mark of them is on their foreheads from the traces of prostration. Such is their likeness in the Torah and their likeness in the Gospel - like as sown corn that sendeth forth its shoot and strengtheneth it and riseth firm upon its stalk, delighting the sowers - that He may enrage the disbelievers with (the sight of) them. Allah hath promised, unto such of them as believe and do good works, forgiveness and immense reward."

Koran 48:29

"....bowing and falling prostrate   ....seeking bounty from Allah     ....and immense reward."







Matthew 4:8
Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;
And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.
10  Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.


Luke 4:5
And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.
6  And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it.
If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.
8  And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.





...





...





Ephesians 6:12
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.




Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Reply #12 - Jun 11th, 2009 at 11:01am
 
You realise Muslims and their culture is not the only problem...  there are other cultures and nationalities who do not wish to assimilate or fit in.  Even though I must admit that Muslim based nationalities are by far the worst, due to the fact that their culture espouses staying apart from all others.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
NorthOfNorth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male
Re: Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Reply #13 - Jun 11th, 2009 at 11:05am
 
Judaism requires that Jews do not assimilate.
Back to top
 

Conviction is the art of being certain
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Multiculti death of Australian National Identity
Reply #14 - Jun 11th, 2009 at 11:11am
 
yet many jews marry outside their religion.

Ah how do you explain the Americans that are Jews then if they have not assimilated?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 11th, 2009 at 11:19am by Grendel »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 13
Send Topic Print