CREATING NATIONAL DISUNITY

Multiculturalism is an unsound political theory, advocated by liberals, academics, media personnel, social theorists, government officials, and politicians. While it is supported by a majority of those people, it is actually opposed by the overall majority of Australians.

It is a deliberate policy to actively maintain, support and build(1) foreign cultures in Australia, to the direct detriment of the Australian identity, culture and way of life.

Instead of allowing immigrants, and their native-born offspring, to naturally assimilate into the Australian culture, governments are knowingly creating bases of foreign culture in this country. These deliberately divisive policies are carried out in two areas.

First, through the multicultural policies themselves, whereby foreign cultures are sustained and encouraged. Large sums of money are granted to "ethnic" organisations, which boosts the abilities of such organisations to service and perpetuate their "ethnic culture". In schools, multicultural policies are actively pursued, whereby children are encouraged to identify with their "ethnicity", rather than to become "fully" Australian. Many, if not all, aspects of public life are touched in a myriad of ways by official multicultural policies, all of which actually encourage a "them and us" attitude between "new Australians" and "old Australians".

Secondly, immigration policies are based upon continuing mass immigration, which gives foreign cultures in Australia the ability to self-sustain their separate
development.

These deliberately divisive policies are turning Australians against each other, and are creating a country populated by a collection of separate communities, instead of a nation populated by a nationally unified society.

Multicultural Australia has thus become a breeding ground for a whole range of "micro-nations", each with their own political and cultural agendas. Indeed, Geoffrey Blainey has warned that "multiculturalism ... is a new form of colonialism, in which we are the colony of every nation on earth".(2) As Australia struggles to encompass the many little Chinas, little Japans, little Italys, and little Croatias, all determined to preserve their own national, cultural and ethnic peculiarities (including not only "lovely" dancing and foods, but sometimes strange, if not barbaric, customs; as well as some extremely strong ethnic hatreds), it is very easy to see the disunity created among these ethnic communities; as well as between them and those who see themselves as "Australians", foremost loyal to Australia.

Large-scale immigration programmes run the risk that ethnic enclaves will develop, a risk that is heightened by multicultural policies which give immigrants "little incentive to learn English and become socially and economically integrated with those outside their group". Such ethnic ghettos can provide a stimulus to the creation of "ethnic gangs that prey on their own community". Another dark side of this situation is that such enclaves "provide ideal bases for groups to engage in politically motivated violence. Indeed, the conflict over the former Yugoslavia has in Australia resulted in several incidents, including 11 unsolved fire bombings". The ethnic and political rivalry witnessed between the Greek and Macedonian communities in Australia involved "a demonstration outside Parliament House by 60,000 Greeks, a brawl at a soccer match and firebombings and vandalism", but such incidents are minor - compared with the potential for widespread inter-ethnic rivalry and violence. Such a situation is indicative of what multiculturalism can bring about.(3)

As Professor Blainey has stated: "Recent governments emphasize the merits of a multicultural society and ignore the dangers. And yet the evidence is clear that many multicultural societies have failed and that the human cost of the failure has been high. Many of our refugees actually come from multicultural societies that are faltering or in disarray". Also, Professor Loring Danforth has admitted that "Ironically, Australia's own commitment to multiculturalism may also encourage immigrants to involve themselves in the national conflicts of their homelands. This policy of multiculturalism ... defines people in ethnic categories and makes it possible for them to maintain their identities as Italians, Greeks, or Macedonians. Multiculturalism, with its emphasis on community languages and ethnic media, promotes the development of these ethnic identities and impedes the development of a strong Australian national identity."(4)

We do not need a crystal ball to see where multiculturalism will lead us. The future will bring a vast amount of inter-ethnic rivalry and resultant clashes, even leading to race riots reminiscent of those clashes in the UK and USA. Australia faces the spectre of being another disunified "multicultural" society like Sri Lanka, South Africa, Northern Ireland, Lebanon, the former Yugoslavia, Fiji, etc.; not to mention the USA and the UK, with their continually strained communities, and occasional race riots. The prospects of such a disunified nation are appalling.

http://www.gwb.com.au/gwb/news/pc/multi3.htm

Secondly, I view multiculturalism as a form of soft-totalitarianism, that is slowly becoming more and more "hard" totalitarian (especially in Europe) as time continues to go by. While multiculturalism masquerades as an ideology that is all encompassing and all tolerating, the disconnect between its pretenses and its practices can only be described as a figurative abyss. Multiculturalism is dogmatic and unrelenting, and exhibits nearly all of the characteristics of some of the strangest and most mendacious religious cults of the twentieth century. This is well evidenced in many of its mantras, the behaviors of its advocates and the garrote it has on the spoken and written word. Multiculturalism distorts the English language in the most sordid and Orwellian of fashions. "WAR IS PEACE" "LOVE IS WAR" and finally, "DIVERSITY IS UNITY".

Despite being an ideology that is supposed to tolerate dissent and provide a platform for all alternating viewpoints, multiculturalism cannot in anyway tolerate dissent of multiculturalism itself. Those who criticize it are immediately branded as "racists" (truly, the 21st century equivalent of "heretic"), or "ignorant". No matter how well reasoned the argument of the critic is, it cannot penetrate the mere ectoderm of the multiculturalist, for he has had the idea that anybody who would dare even criticize an ideology that is predicated upon the idea of universal tolerance is evil so thoroughly drummed into his mind that the eloquence and reasoning of his opponent makes no difference to him.

Multiculturalism is an ideology that posits that there are no universal truths, no sense of right or wrong, except this particular universal truth, posited by multiculturalism. A truly bizarre distortion of basic reasoning at any rate. Multiculturalism does not tolerate criticism of itself because it is itself built upon such flawed reasoning and faulty premises that allowed discussion of its strengths and weaknesses would lead to its swift demise. Period.

Quote:


Including one that has as its stated aim to make you a slave under its rule, and then you have to censor yourself from ever quoting those in Islam who say this - because its 'racist' apparently.

I think it will be all downhill from here for some in this volatile mixture of opposite self-interests.

Grendel wrote on Jun 20^th, 2009 at 1:55pm:


Everybody says it doesn't work, wherever it was tried it failed!

I wander what does it take to realise that it doesn't work?

Suppose only hope is to get elected several politicians strong enough to be able to call spade a spade.

Calanen wrote on Jun 20^th, 2009 at 6:35pm:



And where can we do that?

If every criticism is shot down, looks like the only way to get anybody's attention would be some kind of disobedience.

ROTFLMAO

Take your hands off your ears, open your eyes, and stop chanting "I can't hear you" Mozz..

Defenders of multiculturalism who oppose it reflexively wth racism make the same mistake as those racists who deny individual freedom. Both are deeply offensive and stupid.

It is a fact that multicultural policies exist ONLY in western liberal democracies. Debate about it is about self-government in western liberal democracies. Shouting down opposition to it reveals a reflexive oppositon to the very ideals of western liberalism. Equating it wth racism is a lazy short-hand by them saying, in effect, " I can't think about this, you should therefore shut up."

Culture and race are evidently not identical. Multiculturalists conflating culture and race are stupid, as are racists who deny that an indiviual of a given race is capable to perceive the difference between cultures and also deny his his freedom then to cultivate in himself the one he perceives to be the best.