... wrote on Aug 11
th, 2010 at 1:55pm:
Quote:You just gave the example about Zulus. The greatest genetic diversity within homo sapiens sapiens is in Africa. In other words within that one 'race' as you call it there is much more genetical variation than there is between say typical Danes and typical Japanese. If you want to go on appearance, there are some native Peruvians that you wouldn't be able to tell from Koreans.
That's why I specifically said 'zulus' and not 'africans'
We might have got lazy with our 'white race' and 'black race' categories, when there are many races grouped together under these banners.
Well according to Anthropologists, race is not a scientifically valid biological category. It might be important as a socially constructed category, I guess in the same way as religions are used, but it has no biological basis.
You can certainly classify people into colour, eye types, hair colour etc, but it doesn't have a scientific basis. That's why you hear the same old thing from people who study humanity - the experts in the field, who say that there is only one race - the human race.
It's perhaps more useful to talk about
ethnicity from the point of view of cultural identity.