Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 
Send Topic Print
Cooling not warming... (Read 25738 times)
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #165 - Jun 12th, 2009 at 11:04am
 
The thicker it gets the heavier it gets the more likely to break off... but hey that'll be blamed on global warming too.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #166 - Jun 14th, 2009 at 9:50am
 
Happy wrote on Jun 12th, 2009 at 10:36am:
The only problem is that Southern icecap is actually shrinking in some parts and increasing in thickness in other parts of Antarctica.


That's not actually a problem. That's actually good. If East Antarctica were actually melting at this stage, we'd have extremely major problems. Fortunately, our problems are just major.

Let's get this right.

Deniers often use the 'A' word - Alarmist.

Listen up -

It's the message that's alarming, NOT THE MESSENGER!

THEOREM: Climate alarmism does not exist.
PROOF: You can't actually overdo the "alarmism", because very plausible scenarios are THE MOST ALARMING IMAGINABLE.

(And this is one reason why the GW debate is so messy and astroturfing sells so well.)  Grin
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #167 - Jun 14th, 2009 at 9:57am
 
Happy wrote on Jun 12th, 2009 at 10:36am:
While ago couple of scientists from Japan run computer model on climate change and they came to conclusion that up to 10 years melting icecaps would actually cause temporary cooling effect.

(Roughly 1 gram of ice at 0 C temperature needs about 80 calories to become 1 gram of water at 0 C)

Should their model be right, current seemingly cooling could be just model playing itself out in reality.


That's the problem with using simplified and incomplete 'models'. Does the so called 'model' take into account changes in albedo due to decreased sea ice? No? Well it's the main effect in play in the Arctic, and to some extent in the Antarctic Peninsula. (In plain language, seawater looks much darker from Space and absorbs more heat than ice, which tends to reflect radiation.)

As far as  East Antarctica goes, well come back in 3000 years and it might be an issue by then.

Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #168 - Jun 23rd, 2009 at 8:18pm
 
muso wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 9:25am:
We already know how much cooling is caused by CFC's and other ozone depletants.


Interesting. Green policies (getting rid of CFCs) are major contributors to warming. What next? Bring back leaded petrol?

The greens said we'd die from the hole in our socks - I mean the ozone layer. So we rushed in, preventative-like, changed our ways - and waddaya know? we are going to die from warming (or cooling) !!!

CFC, or chlorofluorocarbon, gases were widely deployed in air conditioning and refrigeration units before they were found to destroy the ozone layer and banned under the 1987 Montreal Protocol. They were replaced by HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons) gases that have far less effect on ozone but have since been revealed as extremely powerful greenhouse gases. A tonne of HFC-23 used in refrigeration has the same global warming potential as 14,800tonnes of CO2.



Got that?

1 tonne of HFC23 'green' gas = 14,800 tonnes of CO2. Fourteen thousand and eight hundred TONNES of CO2.

That's what a wag would call a smacking inconvenient truth.


http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,25669015-5013404,00.html

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #169 - Jun 24th, 2009 at 8:47am
 
Soren wrote on Jun 23rd, 2009 at 8:18pm:
muso wrote on Jun 2nd, 2009 at 9:25am:
We already know how much cooling is caused by CFC's and other ozone depletants.


Interesting. Green policies (getting rid of CFCs) are major contributors to warming. What next? Bring back leaded petrol?

The greens said we'd die from the hole in our socks - I mean the ozone layer. So we rushed in, preventative-like, changed our ways - and waddaya know? we are going to die from warming (or cooling) !!!

CFC, or chlorofluorocarbon, gases were widely deployed in air conditioning and refrigeration units before they were found to destroy the ozone layer and banned under the 1987 Montreal Protocol. They were replaced by HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons) gases that have far less effect on ozone but have since been revealed as extremely powerful greenhouse gases. A tonne of HFC-23 used in refrigeration has the same global warming potential as 14,800tonnes of CO2.



Got that?

1 tonne of HFC23 'green' gas = 14,800 tonnes of CO2. Fourteen thousand and eight hundred TONNES of CO2.

That's what a wag would call a smacking inconvenient truth.


http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,25669015-5013404,00.html



Hmmm Let's compare apples with apples though.

All this is true, but the mass of HFC23 that is actually released into the atmosphere is miniscule compared to that of CO2. Like we put out roughly 27,000Tg (teragrams) of CO2 every year. By  comparison, we emit something like 0.005Tg of HFC23.  Those figures are 'near enough' estimates. I could probably look them up.  

So even given the higher GWP(Global Warming potential), it's insignificant in the scheme of things. The figure usually quoted is the 100 year time horizon, and for HFC-23, that is actually 11700 (CO2=1).

You have to look at the total impact. Let's not confuse ozone depletion with the greenhouse effect. The world actually did something about the Ozone depletion with the Montreal protocol. That was one crisis that we averted.

By the way, the CFC's that were gradually replaced from 1987 onwards generally had high GWP's too, so the implication that the HFC's were worse, is misleading.

The highest GWP that I know of is sulphur hexafluoride, which is used as an insulator in some High Voltage transformers. The GWP for SF6 is 23900 (CO2=1), but again the total global emission is miniscule - even less than for HFC23.  
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 24th, 2009 at 8:57am by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #170 - Jun 24th, 2009 at 11:06am
 
We averted that crisis did we?
How big is the hole now.
last time I looked it was still there and as big as ever.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #171 - Jun 24th, 2009 at 11:44am
 
Grendel wrote on Jun 24th, 2009 at 11:06am:
We averted that crisis did we?
How big is the hole now.
last time I looked it was still there and as big as ever.


Almost as big - but if we had done nothing it would have been much bigger. Yes,  we averted a crisis.

The Ozone hole has actually decreased slightly in the last two seasons, but some of that is due to reduced solar activity. However the total Stratospheric chlorine has reduced.

The best you could say is that it is stabilising. The duration is shorter in recent years than for historical maxima.

On current predictions, it will start to close around 2050.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #172 - Jun 24th, 2009 at 11:47am
 
Sure..

We know its seasonal too don't we and that its almost that time now.
A natural variation you forgot to mention.

2050?  Well I probably won't be around then.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #173 - Jun 24th, 2009 at 12:07pm
 
Grendel wrote on Jun 24th, 2009 at 11:47am:
Sure..

We know its seasonal too don't we and that its almost that time now.
A natural variation you forgot to mention.

2050?  Well I probably won't be around then.


Yeah, it's seasonal in that the largest effect happens around September every year, and it's also affected by variations in the solar cycle.  I thought I already mentioned the solar cycle.

The main indicator is the slow decrease in stratospheric chlorine.

I might still be around in 2050. You never know. All that green tea must do something for me Grin
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Online


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 9512
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #174 - Jun 24th, 2009 at 12:25pm
 
muso wrote on Jun 24th, 2009 at 12:07pm:
Grendel wrote on Jun 24th, 2009 at 11:47am:
Sure..

We know its seasonal too don't we and that its almost that time now.
A natural variation you forgot to mention.

2050?  Well I probably won't be around then.


Yeah, it's seasonal in that the largest effect happens around September every year, and it's also affected by variations in the solar cycle.  I thought I already mentioned the solar cycle.

The main indicator is the slow decrease in stratospheric chlorine.

I might still be around in 2050. You never know. All that green tea must do something for me Grin



Correlation ... causation ...what was that again?

Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #175 - Jun 24th, 2009 at 3:46pm
 
tallowood wrote on Jun 24th, 2009 at 12:25pm:
muso wrote on Jun 24th, 2009 at 12:07pm:
Grendel wrote on Jun 24th, 2009 at 11:47am:
Sure..

We know its seasonal too don't we and that its almost that time now.
A natural variation you forgot to mention.

2050?  Well I probably won't be around then.


Yeah, it's seasonal in that the largest effect happens around September every year, and it's also affected by variations in the solar cycle.  I thought I already mentioned the solar cycle.

The main indicator is the slow decrease in stratospheric chlorine.

I might still be around in 2050. You never know. All that green tea must do something for me Grin



Correlation ... causation ...what was that again?



Tallow - Can you please be less vague for a change? Don't tell me that you're an ozone depletion skeptic  Wink - or are you talking about green tea ? LOL
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #176 - Jul 8th, 2009 at 4:34pm
 
muso wrote on Jun 9th, 2009 at 3:51pm:
Well it ain't going to happen. Solar Cycle 24 has already started. We've already had the solar magnetic field reversal, since the new sunspots were reverse polarity.  Besides, we had virtually no sunspots in the past couple of years, and it didn't exactly make a lot of difference.

Are we going to have another Maunder minimum? I don't think so.


Just to confirm that, here's some breaking news:

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/090706-sunspot-activity.html
Quote:
After one of the longest sunspot droughts in modern times, solar activity picked up quickly over the weekend.

A new group of sunspots developed, and while not dramatic by historic standards, the spots were the most significant in many months.

"This is the best sunspot I've seen in two years," observer Michael Buxton of Ocean Beach, Calif., said on Spaceweather.com.

Solar activity goes in a roughly 11-year cycle. Sunspots are the visible signs of that activity, and they are the sites from which massive solar storms lift off. The past two years have marked the lowest low in the cycle since 1913, and for a while scientists were wondering if activity would ever pick back up.


Looks like we're coming out of Solar minimum.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #177 - Aug 1st, 2009 at 5:49pm
 
It appears we are now entering a period of COOLING PREDICTIONS>>>

Quote:
In addition, in even more bad news for the Union of Concerned Scientists, many scientists are now predicting a coming global COOLING.

(See: Scientist: 'There is no possible global warming threat for at least next 193 years' -- Predicts possible COOLING;
Australian scientists declare climate change 'a natural phenomenon'...warn of 'severe COOLING';
Geologist warns of 'coming ice age';
The Sun: 'Lowest of any solar cycle since 1928' and 'Global temps have flat lined since 2001...This is nothing like anything we've seen since 1950...Cooling trend could last for up to 30 years' - June 22, 2009 )
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #178 - Aug 1st, 2009 at 8:07pm
 
Well, unfortunately we will probably not have to wait long for the loons to drop this line of cock and bull.
The latest studies show the exact opposite of what these denialist crackpots have been contending, contrary to ALL, respected scientific opinion.

A few years ago we expected to see slight cooling until 2011/12, but new studies expect the heat to be back on in force as early as next year, with new record highs exceeding 1998 predicted with it.

We may hope for two things from this, that governments will start to act more rapidly, and denialists will finally shut the heck up.
(At least until the next phase peaks, and then they will claim we are cooling again, the cretins)

Quote:
New estimate based on the forthcoming upturn in solar activity and El Niño southern oscillation cycles is expected to silence global warming sceptics

The Guardian, July 27, 2009

The world faces record-breaking temperatures as the sun's activity increases, leading the planet to heat up significantly faster than scientists had predicted for the next five years, according to a study.

The hottest year on record was 1998, and the relatively cool years since have led to some global warming skeptics claiming that temperatures have levelled off or started to decline. But new research firmly rejects that argument.

The research, to be published in Geophysical Research Letters, was carried out by Judith Lean, of the US Naval Research Laboratory, and David Rind, of Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

The work is the first to assess the combined impact on global temperature of four factors: human influences such as CO2 and aerosol emissions; heating from the sun; volcanic activity and the El Nino southern oscillation, the phenomenon by which the Pacific Ocean flips between warmer and cooler states every few years.

The analysis shows the relative stability in global temperatures in the last seven years is explained primarily by the decline in incoming sunlight associated with the downward phase of the 11-year solar cycle, together with a lack of strong El Niño events. These trends have masked the warming caused by CO2 and other greenhouse gases.

As solar activity picks up again in the coming years, the research suggests, temperatures will shoot up at 150% of the rate predicted by the UN
s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Lean and Rind's research also sheds light on the extreme average temperature in 1998. The paper confirms that the temperature spike that year was caused primarily by a very strong El Niño episode. A future episode could be expected to create a spike of equivalent magnitude on top of an even higher baseline, thus shattering the 1998 record.

The study comes within days of announcements from climatologists that the world is entering a new El Nino warm spell. This suggests that temperature rises in the next year could be even more marked than Lean and Rind's paper suggests. A particularly hot autumn and winter could add to the pressure on policy makers to reach a meaningful deal at December's climate-change negotiations in Copenhagen.

Bob Henson, of the National Centre for Atmospheric Research in Colorado, said: "To claim that global temperatures have cooled since 1998 and therefore that man-made climate change isn't happening is a bit like saying spring has gone away when you have a mild week after a scorching Easter."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jul/27/world-warming-faster-study


http://www.heatisonline.org/contentserver/objecthandlers/index.cfm?ID=7430&Metho...
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Cooling not warming...
Reply #179 - Aug 1st, 2009 at 8:27pm
 
LOL
The Guardian the biggest PC LW propaganda sheet in the world.
You gotta know your sources Mozz.
Someone forgot to tell him the El Nino effect doesn't count.  LOL.
Pity we'll have to wait to see if those alarmist predictions/guesses/wishful-thinking turns out to be right eh.

Now where were we oh yes you ridiculing and calling people with dissenting opinions loons.

How come the alarmists are now saying that warming has been good or those record cold temperatures we've been having would have been far worse?  LOL.  I do wish they'd make up their minds.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 1st, 2009 at 8:35pm by Grendel »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 
Send Topic Print