Soren wrote on Jun 23
rd, 2009 at 8:18pm:
muso wrote on Jun 2
nd, 2009 at 9:25am:
We already know how much cooling is caused by CFC's and other ozone depletants.
Interesting. Green policies (getting rid of CFCs) are major contributors to warming. What next? Bring back leaded petrol?
The greens said we'd die from the hole in our socks - I mean the ozone layer. So we rushed in, preventative-like, changed our ways - and waddaya know? we are going to die from warming (or cooling) !!!
CFC, or chlorofluorocarbon, gases were widely deployed in air conditioning and refrigeration units before they were found to destroy the ozone layer and banned under the 1987 Montreal Protocol. They were replaced by HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons) gases that have far less effect on ozone but have since been revealed as extremely powerful greenhouse gases. A tonne of HFC-23 used in refrigeration has the same global warming potential as 14,800tonnes of CO2.
Got that?
1 tonne of HFC23 'green' gas = 14,800 tonnes of CO2. Fourteen thousand and eight hundred TONNES of CO2.
That's what a wag would call a smacking inconvenient truth.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,25669015-5013404,00.html Hmmm Let's compare apples with apples though.
All this is true, but the
mass of HFC23 that is actually released into the atmosphere is miniscule compared to that of CO2. Like we put out roughly 27,000Tg (teragrams) of CO2 every year. By comparison, we emit something like 0.005Tg of HFC23. Those figures are 'near enough' estimates. I could probably look them up.
So even given the higher GWP(Global Warming potential), it's insignificant in the scheme of things. The figure usually quoted is the 100 year time horizon, and for HFC-23, that is actually
11700 (CO2=1).
You have to look at the total impact. Let's not confuse ozone depletion with the greenhouse effect. The world actually did something about the Ozone depletion with the Montreal protocol. That was one crisis that we averted.
By the way, the CFC's that were gradually replaced from 1987 onwards generally had high GWP's too, so the implication that the HFC's were worse, is misleading.
The highest GWP that I know of is sulphur hexafluoride, which is used as an insulator in some High Voltage transformers. The GWP for SF6 is 23900 (CO2=1), but again the total global emission is miniscule - even less than for HFC23.