They did a reinactment on lifetime channel for their new movie.

It involved a beautiful, flawless woman getting beheaded by some drunken male with zits all over his face.

All the other men in the movie were depicted as just completely oblivious or doormats, and ultimately come running to their mary sue main character's aid but it is too late. The dreaded alpha male has struck again! When will men learn that women are the surpirior gender?!

You can watch it again on Lifetime channel this weekend right after the color purple and sister act.

mantra wrote on Feb 18^th, 2009 at 8:11am:

Hey, if you're going to murder someone. You might as well make use out of the corpse.

I'd rather give the corpse to some necrophyliac to have his way with. Seeing as I definitely would not ingest anything involving my enemies..

But atleast that woman was thinking with portals!

Whoosh, there goes another point, flying straight over mantra's head.

Do you believe there is any cultural imperative for stabbing someone 37 times, and then feeding the corpse to his children, Mantra?

Quote:


Of course not, only the culture of Muslims affect their behaviour. Westerners only do such things if they're mentally deranged. Muslims aren't mentally deranged though, it's just their culture.

abu_rashid wrote on Feb 19^th, 2009 at 7:52pm:


The UN report says that "The report says that "honour" killings tend to be more prevalent in, but are not limited to, countries with a majority Muslim population."

How do you explain the prevalence of "honour" killings in muslim countries?

Quote:


What on earth do 'honour' killings have to do with this case??

If a Western man kills his wife cos she is going to divorce him, is that an 'honour' killing? Or is it only if a Muslim does it?

These claims are truly ridiculous.

A man killed his wife in a domestic dispute end of story (for the normal sane people), but for the Islamophobes noooo it's all about Islam isn't it. Every single thing any Muslim ever does is always about Islam isn't it?

You people aren't even worth debating with, really,

Honour killing has nothing to do with Islam, even if 100% of cases were by Muslims.

And it likewise has nothing to do with this issue we're discussing.

You're simply throwing it in for good measure.

abu_rashid wrote on Feb 20^th, 2009 at 8:13am:

You are truly delusional and an out-right liar.

Honour killing has nothing to do with Islam, even if 100% of cases were by Muslims.

Except for things like death for apostasy, death for cheating etc, right Abu? Why is it that you think this guy is a nutcase, but you are not when you call for the stoning to death of apostates, blasphemers and straying child brides?

Deflect deflect deflect.

Answer the question for once, abu, you bloody pathetic coward.

abu_rashid wrote on Feb 21^st, 2009 at 8:55pm:


You are in sore need for someone to grab you by the scruff of the neck, shake you, slap you around and scream into your face from very close-up: 'wake up, snap out of it!!  And then hang you on a peg somewere miles away from this wrethed miserable nonsense that you have been sucking up for far too long.

What the hell is wrong with you?!!? What damned dehumanising, delusional  fog has taken possession of your faculties?!?

Quote:


Yes he did. Just not in this thread.

Quote:


Abu would like to see it become legal to stone people to death for things that are not even considered crimes now. He thinks the government should organise the stoning, truck in a load of suitably small stones (so the victim doesn't die and miss out on the prolonged suffering), then round up members of the public and get them to throw the stones. It would be a good occasion to socialise and maybe pick up a fourth wife.

Quote:


It's got nothing to do with racism. I think abu is of Anglo decent. It's about ideology.

Maybe you're right sprint. I'll have to ask Abu about that. Maybe it becomes sort of like a sport, where the big men line up and see who can do the most damage to the little girl. You can imagine the Muslim men getting embarassed if they missed by a couple of meters or something like that, in front of all their mates. Then afterwards they can gather round the milk bar and recount how they gave that nasty bitch what she deserved.

Quote:

How are Jews a race?

Quote:


There is that bit about beheading in the film "Fitna" where one of the hate crazy islamic preachers works a crowd of devoted muslims into murderous frenzy reciting koran and brandishing sword over his head. He talks about beheading of Jews.

"I think that Abu does need to acknowledge that Islamist extremists, do indeed interpret koranic texts to justify their, not infrequent, beheadings, but I do not know that it is really fair to then extrapolate that, to include muslims who do not have their life influenced by extremist thinking.

This is where people like calanen and I part ways, in that I regard Islam, as having many negatives, but I regard muslims, as just normal people, who are badly misrepresented due to the horrible extremism of the zealots who claim to champion Islam, and all muslimhood.

I think Abu would probably know the statistics, but the numbers of muslims, who have never condoned, or given succour in any way, to extremism, would undoubtedly be the massive majority, and that is going to be well over a billion people.

So to vilify over a billion people, because you don't like their religion, and unfairly extrapolate a link to terrorism, because of it, is pretty dogmatic, and not something that people of good conscience would want to do.


He can maintain his campaign to try and let people know of the aspects of Islam he finds distasteful, but it should never spill over into wholesale denigration of the muslim people, because it just is not a fair thing to do." (c) mozzaok

mozza, Nick Berg was just like you only younger 

Quote:

Oh it has everything to do with Jews.

Jews are the pretencious assclowns who took hollow ground from The Muslims. On the basis they were God's chosen people, and simply declared that land as their's.

They take this "God's chosen people" pretty seriously and expect other countries to wage war on their behalf. Where as Muslims believe in submitting to God. Humility eludes The Jew.

Jews believe themselves to be a race, that's why they keep bringing up the holocaust, rather then the possibility that Hitler knew Judaism presented a great threat to his rule as they were just as batshit as he was...


Jews potray themselves as a religion, as a nationality, as a race. And nobody bats an eye. They commit atrocious acts, they have huge influence on many powerful nations, and they're are radical Zionists everywhere occupying more places in general then Muslim Jihadists.

And yet noone bat's an eye. Everyone just condemns The Muslims. Who, conviently enough, are the only people who standup against The Jews.

Not a history student are you Jim.

Pssst. careful, don't let the joos hear you. There'll be hell to pay if they find out you are against them. Look what happened to the muslims.
Keep your head down if you know what's good for you. Just keep playing with your willy, there's a good boy.i

Do you really think that Mo Hassan "honourably" cut Aasiya's head off because she was related to the spreading of Zionism? 

Would you do the same if you find your girl in bed with a Zionist? 

Jim Profit wrote on Feb 24^th, 2009 at 6:13pm:

No.

Quote:

Hey, wasn't it you guys who invented the machete?

That's a perfect beheading weapon if I ever saw one.

Quote:

No. I was under the impression you said if she cheated on me for a Zionist.

If she spread zionism I'd punish her by with-holding sex. It'd be a battle of wills.

I'm pretty darn lazy, I can go without physical extersion for a very long time. Hell, I'm too lazy to masturbate.

Jim Profit wrote on Feb 24^th, 2009 at 7:51pm:


Let me say this to you AGAIN, so it is very clear to you.

You dont have a girl. You chat with someone on the internetz, that you have never met. You cant have sex with her. You cant even kiss her. She is not your girlfriend.

Calanen wrote on Feb 24^th, 2009 at 9:40pm:


And your NOT A LAWYER, YOUR A LOSER!

Oz Politics: Trolls trolling trolls

Christ, sure are alot of grammar nazis in here.

I don't think you aussies have any room to talk about spelling errors considering you can't even pronounce "danger" correctly.

Jim Profit wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 8:20am:


hehe...its an act of desperation Jim. They have no other response so they have to resort to grammar. The irony is this tosser has been made to look foolish time and time again, and even though his own grammer is rather poor to say the least, there is so much more to laugh at him about, that I just don't even bother.

By the way Calanen, speaking of grammer...in your post aimed at Jim....'dont' actually has an apostrophe. It is 'don't'....haha, being a lawyer and all I would of thought your grammer wouldn't be so poor.

You know...people in glass houses....

HAHAHA...is that the best you can do.

Quote:


Don't think I ever claimed to be a 'hot shot'. Maybe that's just your own idolization of me speaking. I don't claim to be a lawyer - I am a lawyer.  And if legal matters come up, I will give a legal opinion.

You for example, could, give an opinion on the best way to scrub toilets - and we would all defer to your experience.

Quote:


If me saying what I do is enough to make you regret your own miserable existence, then mission accomplished. I'm not going to hide what I do because of your frail ego and childlike insecurities.

Quote:


You see, I don't need validation from you or the internet forum. Credibility for what?  Go on challenge me to a fight at Preston Mosque again. It will make you feel better.

tallow - not surprising the islamic society would refuse to listen to a woman and continue to revere the man she calls a "monster."

They will not change, even given this.
islams a dead dog.



calanen - good on you for making more of your work life than I have made of mine. Congrats.

Calanen wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 2:14pm:


I don't think I have ever read anyone else here ever reveal their occupation or trade..except you. Then again, the rest of us don't need approval or 'respect' from a bunch of strangers on a message board.

The fact that you felt the need to tell us all that your a 'lawyer' in the first place is rather telling.

Calanen wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 2:14pm:


HAHAHA. I'd have to be very desperate to seek legal opinion from you. Given your rather evident poor debating skills, and your almost comical attempts to provide 'evidence' to support your ludicrous opinions...I suspect that those seeking legal opinion from you are the very desperate, or those who cannot afford any better. If you are a lawyer (and thats a big if) no doubt you would be bargain basement.

ffs...Abu has wiped the floor of you, and made you look stupid (though your to thick to realise it). I can only imagine what another experienced lawyer would do.

Calanen wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 2:14pm:


wow...good one. Are you going to put that in your book.

Calanen wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 2:14pm:


Unlike you, I'm very comfortable with my life, and don't need to share my occupation with strangers from the internet to give validation to my life (or opinions). You forget...thats you. Your the one telling us what you do like its supposed to change our opinions..not me.

Its not about you hiding what you do...you've announced it at every opportune moment. Like being a lawyer is supposed to validate your pathetic opinions. Unfortunately for you....your posts and your regular ridiculous and erroneous claims continuously make your 'lawyer' claims look dubious to say the least.

Like really....I didn't realise that lawyers could be so dumb.


Calanen wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 2:14pm:


haha...but thats just it. By bragging about being a lawyer (cause thats exactly what you are doing...not sure why though, cause really, its not much to brag about) and telling us that your 'writing a book' (how funny is that)...that is exactly what you doing...seeking validation from strangers on an internet forum. Really...its quite pathetic. I'm not sure whether to laugh at you or pity you.

Calanen wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 2:14pm:


I never challenged you to a fight. Seems your adding 'liar' as well as 'ignorant' to your portfolio.

I challenged you to a debate, in person. I suspect that in person you would be a coward. That it is much easier for you to spread your lies on a forum, but in person you'd melt butter, I suspected you were a coward, and you have confirmed it. Is yellow your favorite colour?

Why would I want to fight you. Why would I care. Your irrelevent...quite frankly not even worth the waste of effort or time.

I wonder if muslims feel good when they do "honour" killings?

tallowood wrote on Feb 27^th, 2009 at 8:52am:


I wonder if Tallowood feels good when the mental institution he resides in gives him access to a computer for a couple of hours.

"I'm sure you can appreciate the difference between doctrine and practise." (c) abu

"Beheading is a method of killing. It's irrelevant. ... Method of killing is a minor detail. It's got nothing to do with the Qur'an, as I mentioned above it's hardly if ever mentioned in the Qur'an at all." (c) abu


Interesting, abu admits that beheading is mentioned in koran.
It also seems that abu suggests to leave koran, (may be in libraries in fiction section), but to purge his numerous brothers who use the methods of "honour" killing. 

abu, what is the best method to do that?