Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Muslims refuse to fight (Read 5795 times)
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 6800
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #15 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 8:37pm
 
Quote:
"It is not for a believer to kill a believer unless it be by mistake" -- Qur'an 4:92.


That is very strange considering that more muslims kill muslims then anybody else.
Anyway, don't they ask people joining an army if there can be any religious, ideological, dietary, etc reason that would make fighting problematic for them?
Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #16 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:02pm
 
freediver,

Quote:
It depends how you define Jew. I think most would support Australia.


Then I'd suggest you don't really know much about Jews in foreign countries. They are much harder workers in support of Israel than Muslims are in support of any foreign entity. Look at movements like AIPAC and AIJAC and the intense work they do in support of Israel. Also consider that Australia has had many Jews who've made Aliyah (Jewish nationalist/religious immigration), also consider  that Mark Regev, the Israeli propaganda minister, was actually born and raised here in Australia, and was educated in Melbourne University.

You're gullible fd, that's about all I can say. Or you're deliberately denying it, just to get your argument through.

Quote:
But if you restrict your definition to conservative religious Jews, it might go the other way


Actually Zionism is usually stronger amongst non-religious Jews. In fact there's some orthodox groups who even oppose the existence of Israel. I guarantee you if you ask most Jews if they are Zionists, in Australia, the bulk would say yes. Zionism is "Israeli Nationalism".

Quote:
]Also, Islam is the only religion that confuses state with religion


Actually all religions were like this prior to the renaissance, including Christianity. Judaism is one of the most state based religions. No doubt you'll keeep denying it to keep your argument alive. Read the Bible, read the Talmud. Both detail quite clearly a state. Also Israel is a state based on a religious  group. So your argument is shot right there.

Quote:
Sure, depending on how you define it of course. Plenty of Australians of Italian and German descent fought for Australia in WWII.


Did they? How many exactly? I can tell you this much, 4721 of them got herded into internment camps, as they were considered a security threat to the country....

Also the Anglo's had race riots regarding them (so Cronulla wasn't the first? Aussies have a history of this kind of vile behaviour)

Quote:
In Australia, anti-Italian riots occurred on numerous occasions since Italian immigrants, or "wogs" (an Australian English slang for Southern Europeans/Eastern Europens), first began arriving to the country in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Many Australians viewed the Italian immigrants as "immoral", "low", and "dirty".
Wikipedia
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 6800
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #17 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:07pm
 
Abu, why would Australia go in war against Israel? We are not taken over by your lot yet and hopefully never will be.
Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
Calanen
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2241
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #18 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:11pm
 
Quote:
That is very strange considering that more muslims kill muslims then anybody else.


Ah yes. But those who support the puppet governments are not true believers, so it is ok to kill them.

Also, any innocent people who get killed (and I mean real innocents in Islamic terms, other muslims) are called 'involuntary martyrs' by the terrorists.
Back to top
 

Quote:
ISLAM is a vicious [un-reformable] political tyranny, which has always murdered its critics, and it continues that practice even today.
Yadda
 
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 6800
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #19 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:12pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:02pm:
...
Then I'd suggest you don't really know much about Jews in foreign countries. They are much harder workers in support of Israel than Muslims are in support of any foreign entity. ...


That is sounds misleading after all your talk about how all muslims are brothers. You would never condemn any muslim terrorists so it is reasonable to assume that you don't think about them as foreign entities.

Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
Calanen
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2241
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #20 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:12pm
 
tallowood wrote on Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:07pm:
Abu, why would Australia go in war against Israel? We are not taken over by your lot yet and hopefully never will be.


We'd lose too, just quietly.
Back to top
 

Quote:
ISLAM is a vicious [un-reformable] political tyranny, which has always murdered its critics, and it continues that practice even today.
Yadda
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 52178
At my desk.
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #21 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:14pm
 
Quote:
Then I'd suggest you don't really know much about Jews in foreign countries.


I'd suggest you are hopelessly biased. The protocols were a fake, remember?
Quote:
Look at movements like AIPAC and AIJAC and the intense work they do in support of Israel.


Are they a majority, or a minority? Would they still be a member if Israel attacked Australa?

Quote:
Actually Zionism is usually stronger amongst non-religious Jews.


So many religious Jews are not Zionist? What percentage would you class as Zionist? You seem to be characterising Jews by a tiny minority.

Quote:
I guarantee you if you ask most Jews if they are Zionists, in Australia, the bulk would say yes. Zionism is "Israeli Nationalism".


This is about whether they would fight against Australia, not whether they support the right of Israel to exist. Even I support the right of Israel to exist.

Quote:
Judaism is one of the most state based religions.


It's got nothing on Islam.

Quote:
Read the Bible, read the Talmud. Both detail quite clearly a state.


Crap. Like I said, if I want to find out about Judaism or Christianity, an extremist Muslim would be the last person I ask.

Quote:
Also Israel is a state based on a religious  group. So your argument is shot right there.


That has nothing to do with my argument.

Quote:
Also the Anglo's had race riots regarding them (so Cronulla wasn't the first? Aussies have a history of this kind of vile behaviour)


Good piont. Perhaps now you can understand our views on Islam.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #22 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:15pm
 
Calanen,

Quote:
I'd still expect any Jews in the army to do their job.


The fact that you avoided whether you thought they would or wouldn't is noted.  Smiley

Nice double speak there, seriously you should try to get a job with Regev.

Quote:
Yes more Zionist conspiracy stories.


That's right, Jonathan Pollard isn't really sitting in a US prison for stealing military secrets for Israel, it's all just a conspiracy isn't it. And Israel never got military secrets from France via Jews who were French citizens. And Egyptian Jews never blew up British/American interests in Egypt to try and sour relations between Egypt and the West did they... all just Zionist conspiracy stories... Someone's being deluded by stories here, and it ain't me.

Quote:
They already have. WW2.


As pointed out above, 4721 of them were considered to possibly have split loyalties and were interned.

Quote:
The Irish have served in the UK military for a very long period of time, despite other Irish being 'at war' (or believing they were) with the English.


Served in Ireland, fighting against their fellow Irish? I think not.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 6800
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #23 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:19pm
 
Calanen wrote on Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:11pm:
Quote:
That is very strange considering that more muslims kill muslims then anybody else.


Ah yes. But those who support the puppet governments are not true believers, so it is ok to kill them.

Also, any innocent people who get killed (and I mean real innocents in Islamic terms, other muslims) are called 'involuntary martyrs' by the terrorists.


I see, they had covered all aspects. That muslim chaplain who talked the soldier to change his mind must've knew it all and probably some more.



Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
Calanen
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2241
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #24 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:25pm
 
Quote:
Served in Ireland, fighting against their fellow Irish? I think not.


Yes, they did. A lot.

Look up the Easter Rebellion for a more recent example. Even the local Irish police fought with the UK on that one. The Royal Irish Regiment, raised and commanded and quartered in Ireland, fought the rebels in Dublin.
Back to top
 

Quote:
ISLAM is a vicious [un-reformable] political tyranny, which has always murdered its critics, and it continues that practice even today.
Yadda
 
IP Logged
 
easel
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3120
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #25 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:26pm
 
Calanen wrote on Jan 15th, 2009 at 7:17pm:
Certain crimes warrant the death penalty. Martin Bryant should have been executed. Killing 38 people and wounding a 100 or so,


No way he did it. IQ less than 80, firing from the right hip when left handed, shooting out engine blocks, locals saying it wasn't him, judge refused it to go to trial, wasn't allowed to plead innocent, evidence destroyed, witnesses not allowed to testify.

Quote:
The just penalty for some crimes is death. But only, some crimes. These would be, in my view:

- treason
- rape of children
- mass murder;
- murder with heinous circumstances, for example, committing a murder in a gruesome manner, say, through causing long and painful suffering to the deceased.


I disagree for treason, also sedition. It would be very handy to have execution available for those crimes in the event of a hostile government.

Rape of children, I propose castration, genital mutilation, forehead tattoo, removal of tongue, ear drums, eyes, sense of smell and limbs.

Mass murder, depends. If someone has killed 30 people, they would be a mass murderer/serial killer. But what about the circumstances? Say there was a gang war, fighting to survive, it's not the same as just killing people for fun.

I have no problem with torture. If someone raped and killed your sister, would you have an issue with torturing them till they died?

Quote:
Yes more Zionist conspiracy stories.


Dismissing factual evidence as a conspiracy theory doesn't help your cause. Denial and disinformation causes you to lose credibility.

Quote:
They already have. WW2.


I thought the influx of these immigrants was after ww2. Sure there were a couple, but how many is a couple.

I'd be very surprised if the majority of these multicultural society members would bear arms against the culture they live in in Australia. Forget the ones who integrate, it's the ones who live amongst themselves and speak their languages, and bring hatred to this country, they aren't bearing arms if required.

Quote:
There were no Irish here joining in the terror attacks of the IRA against the Queen. None.


So you are saying no Australian citizens or residents have ever left the country to fight against the British crown in Northern Ireland? None have ever lent monetary or material support to the cause? You are wrong.

Quote:
And while I would like a united Ireland, resorting to terror, should never have occured. Anyone who did so, should have been executed. On both sides.


Killing innocent women and children is wrong. Laying down and allowing the British to steal your land, treat you like dirt, kill, maim and rape, subjugate you and just generally bastardise you without fighting back is also wrong. If singing songs and distributing pamphlets doesn't work, break out the Semtex and rifles.

I'd like to see you not resort to guerrilla tactics if your enemy, Islam, decides to wage war in Australia, chaos takes over and there are gun battles and bombings in the street.

Then again, I'd be surprised if you did. Saying something is much easier than actually doing it.
Back to top
 

I am from a foreign government. This is not a joke. I am authorised to investigate state and federal bodies including ASIO.
 
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 6800
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #26 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:28pm
 
abu said

Quote:
"Actually Zionism is usually stronger amongst non-religious Jews."

"Judaism is one of the most state based religions. "


Sounds contradictory. So which one is it, or is it again a wrong translation from an arabic manual? Smiley
Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
Calanen
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2241
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #27 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:28pm
 
tallowood wrote on Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:19pm:
Calanen wrote on Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:11pm:
Quote:
That is very strange considering that more muslims kill muslims then anybody else.


Ah yes. But those who support the puppet governments are not true believers, so it is ok to kill them.

Also, any innocent people who get killed (and I mean real innocents in Islamic terms, other muslims) are called 'involuntary martyrs' by the terrorists.


I see, they had covered all aspects. That muslim chaplain who talked the soldier to change his mind must've knew it all and probably some more.



The way you'd try to change his view is to convince the recruit that the government of Karzai was more properly Islamic than that of the Taliban, and so it was right to support it and put down the Taliban. Which on one level wouldnt be such a stretch, given the insanity that went on under the Taliban.

The problem would become however, if you were just say, fighting Indonesia, and not an insurgent force while assisting allied Islamic governments - that you'd have no room to move.
Back to top
 

Quote:
ISLAM is a vicious [un-reformable] political tyranny, which has always murdered its critics, and it continues that practice even today.
Yadda
 
IP Logged
 
easel
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3120
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #28 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:31pm
 
Calanen wrote on Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:25pm:
Quote:
Served in Ireland, fighting against their fellow Irish? I think not.


Yes, they did. A lot.

Look up the Easter Rebellion for a more recent example. Even the local Irish police fought with the UK on that one. The Royal Irish Regiment, raised and commanded and quartered in Ireland, fought the rebels in Dublin.


Make the distinction now. A lot of Irish in years past who were C of E identified as British, and a lot of Irish who were Catholic identified as Irish. Not so strong these days, but that's how it was.

You will notice RUC was also helping UVF/UDA whatever with immunity and support.

Don't mislead the facts. We aren't in a courtroom here.
Back to top
 

I am from a foreign government. This is not a joke. I am authorised to investigate state and federal bodies including ASIO.
 
IP Logged
 
Calanen
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2241
Re: Muslims refuse to fight
Reply #29 - Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:38pm
 
easel wrote on Jan 15th, 2009 at 9:26pm:
[quote author=Calanen link=1232003795/0#11 date=1232011065]

Certain crimes warrant the death penalty. Martin Bryant should have been executed. Killing 38 people and wounding a 100 or so,


Quote:
No way he did it. IQ less than 80, firing from the right hip when left handed, shooting out engine blocks, locals saying it wasn't him, judge refused it to go to trial, wasn't allowed to plead innocent, evidence destroyed, witnesses not allowed to testify.


He did it. I've read his police interview transcript. It's on the web somewhere, I'll see if I can dig it up.

I dont know about locals saying it wasnt him. But in every crime scene, all the locals will have a different view about what happened.

The judge didn't prevent the matter from going to trial. He pleaded innocent, and then reversed his plea. I think because, his lawyer told him, that any mercy you might expect to have *may* be granted to you if you just pleaded guilty.

Quote:
The just penalty for some crimes is death. But only, some crimes. These would be, in my view:

- treason
- rape of children
- mass murder;
- murder with heinous circumstances, for example, committing a murder in a gruesome manner, say, through causing long and painful suffering to the deceased.


Quote:
I disagree for treason, also sedition. It would be very handy to have execution available for those crimes in the event of a hostile government.


Do you think if there was a hostile government, that it would care about what the law said for these things?

Quote:
Rape of children, I propose castration, genital mutilation, forehead tattoo, removal of tongue, ear drums, eyes, sense of smell and limbs.


May not go that far. I'd just put a bullet in their head and bury them in lime so they dissolve.

Quote:
Mass murder, depends. If someone has killed 30 people, they would be a mass murderer/serial killer. But what about the circumstances? Say there was a gang war, fighting to survive, it's not the same as just killing people for fun.


A bit unlikely, and in which case, it wouldnt be murder.

Quote:
I have no problem with torture. If someone raped and killed your sister, would you have an issue with torturing them till they died?


While it might seem like the good thing to do, it's kind of pointless. Execution, neat and simple, is the appropriate penalty. Firing squad is my preferred method.



Quote:
Yes more Zionist conspiracy stories.


Quote:
Dismissing factual evidence as a conspiracy theory doesn't help your cause. Denial and disinformation causes you to lose credibility.


He was going on with the same crap about how Jewish NGOs control the world. It's cliched, old, and with no basis in fact. I've looked at a hell of a lot of government documents, and I've never seen anything about scary Jewish organisations.

Seen a lot more about other scary organisations.

Quote:
They already have. WW2.


I thought the influx of these immigrants was after ww2. Sure there were a couple, but how many is a couple.

I'd be very surprised if the majority of these multicultural society members would bear arms against the culture they live in in Australia. Forget the ones who integrate, it's the ones who live amongst themselves and speak their languages, and bring hatred to this country, they aren't bearing arms if required.

Quote:
There were no Irish here joining in the terror attacks of the IRA against the Queen. None.


Quote:
So you are saying no Australian citizens or residents have ever left the country to fight against the British crown in Northern Ireland? None have ever lent monetary or material support to the cause? You are wrong.


I know that people have sent money.  But I dont know anyone who has left the Australian army, or refused to serve for this reason. I also havent seen or heard of any Irish attacking people *here*. That's a bit different from Islam, which seems to make local attacks on people.

Quote:
And while I would like a united Ireland, resorting to terror, should never have occured. Anyone who did so, should have been executed. On both sides.


Killing innocent women and children is wrong. Laying down and allowing the British to steal your land, treat you like dirt, kill, maim and rape, subjugate you and just generally bastardise you without fighting back is also wrong.

Quote:
If singing songs and distributing pamphlets doesn't work, break out the Semtex and rifles.


Fine - but they should never have deliberately targetted civilians, which they did. Shopping malls, high streets, bars. That was really messed up.

Quote:
I'd like to see you not resort to guerrilla tactics if your enemy, Islam, decides to wage war in Australia, chaos takes over and there are gun battles and bombings in the street.


It's not going to happen. But if it did, I wouldnt be blowing up shopping malls and cafes. I'd be blowing up the Hamas militia riding around. Or more probably, I'd just leave - that's a personal thing however.

Quote:
Then again, I'd be surprised if you did. Saying something is much easier than actually doing it.


Who can say. 200 years down the track, your scenario is far more conceivable.

Back to top
 

Quote:
ISLAM is a vicious [un-reformable] political tyranny, which has always murdered its critics, and it continues that practice even today.
Yadda
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print