Australian Politics Forum - energy and the theory of relativity

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

(Moderator: Sprintcyclist)

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5

energy and the theory of relativity (Read 8956 times)

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 50548 At my desk.	Re: energy and the theory of relativity Reply #60 - Jan 15^th, 2009 at 2:44pm Quote: If energy only "shifts" then technically the universe is forever. None of this "implosion" death or "cold theory". None of that destroys the energy. The 'cold universe' idea is based on entropy, not energy.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

tallowood

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6048

Re: energy and the theory of relativity
Reply #61 - Jan 15^th, 2009 at 3:43pm

equal(=) and is(==) are not the same operators to start with

furthermore

E=MC^2 does not mean E=M but that E is linearly proportional to M

So on one hand easel is intuitively right there but his statement about the theory of relativity has not been proven is wrong

Albert Einstein's formula e=mc2 proven right, 103 years later

Here is the link for those interested in this
E = mc^2: What does it mean, and where did the equation come from?

ישראל חיה ערבים לערבים

IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: energy and the theory of relativity Reply #62 - Jan 16^th, 2009 at 3:09pm Interesting. Feynman said almost exactly what I said a few posts back: It is impossible to explain honestly the beauties of the laws of nature in a way that people can feel, without their having some deep understanding of mathematics. I am sorry, but this seems to be the case.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: energy and the theory of relativity Reply #63 - Jan 16^th, 2009 at 3:16pm tallowood wrote on Jan 15^th, 2009 at 3:43pm: So on one hand easel is intuitively right there but his statement about the theory of relativity has not been proven is wrong Danger Will Robinson - Can of worms alert.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5