I thought I had seen those photos before, is all. Must be mistaken, or de ja vu, or they are using the same ones still.

Gaybriel wrote on Jan 6^th, 2009 at 10:38pm:



Well, here's more crazy propaganda for you:

Israel pulled out of gaza in 2005. It was completely judenfrei. Still, since hamas was elected in 2006, they fired thousands of rockets into Israel - which was NOT occupying gaza.  Hamas had absolutely no justification to fire those rockets.

So - why do it?

Quote:


Tu quoque (IPA: /tu ˈkwoʊkwɛ/, Latin for "You, too" or "You, also") is a Latin term used to mean a type of logical fallacy. The argument states that a certain position is false or wrong and/or should be disregarded because its proponent fails to act consistently in accordance with that position; it attempts to show that a criticism or objection applies equally to the person making it. It is considered an ad hominem argument, since it focuses on the party itself, rather than its positions.

Contents [hide]
1 Illegitimate use
1.1 You-too version
1.1.1 Legal aspects
1.2 Inconsistency version
2 Legitimate uses
2.1 You-too version
2.2 Inconsistency version
3 See also
4 References

Illegitimate use

In many cases tu quoque arguments are used in a logically fallacious way, to draw a conclusion which is not supported by the premises of the argument.

You-too version

This form of the argument is as follows:

A makes criticism P.
A is also guilty of P.
Therefore, P is dismissed.
This is an instance of the two wrongs make a right fallacy.

Example:

"He cannot accuse me of libel because he was just successfully sued for libel."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

Soren wrote on Jan 6^th, 2009 at 11:02pm:


I think the plight of palestinians has been fairly covered here

the propaganda I refer to is the israeli govt denying what has been blatantly proven to be true.

Soren wrote on Jan 6^th, 2009 at 11:07pm:


I'm not-I've just said it all before and don't feel like repeating myself. read my other posts

Gaybriel wrote on Jan 6^th, 2009 at 11:11pm:



I had a look. I could see no reference in your posts to hamas rockets and the causes of the current israeli bombings.

You are dodging because you cannot justify why it is OK for hamas to fire rockets when gaza is NOT occupied by israel. So you state that you had said it all before when in fact you have not. Isn't that a form of propaganda? It is.

Calanen wrote on Jan 6^th, 2009 at 11:47pm:


no I was answering a question you put out there. yes it was to easel but I was giving my opinion. my opinion is that america also puts out propaganda and that some of that propaganda is produced in hollywood movies such as body of lies

so now you want staged photos? not just examples of propaganda? the criteria keeps narrowing. how convenient

again- where did I say this justifies pallowood as you call it.

wow- I'm using 'islamic tactics' am I. amazing- I must have taken a course somewhere