Gaybriel wrote on Nov 22
nd, 2008 at 1:41pm:
....something I have noticed is that whenever someone tries to reveal a different point of view, tries to clarify a word's definition or reveals it multiple meanings- there is no tolerance for this at all. this is seen as playing games and avoiding the truth- rather than a reflection of the fact that the truth is often hard to find and involves some level of complexity.
Gaybriel,
'Credibilty', is a lovely word.
credible = = able to be believed; convincing.
'Muhammad was the last prophet of God.'
It just doesn't have any ring of credibility for me.
If you read the account of Muhammad's life,
even from ISLAMIC sources, he isn't a person i can give any credence to.
He is not a person i would want to be
inspired by.
Devout muslims say he was their prophet.
To me, he just reads like a politician, a despot, a tyrant, a deceiver, a liar, a warlord, a murderer and pirate.
What troubles me, is that muslims follow Muhammad's life example.
....and ppl such as yourself seem to see nothing wrong with that.
In my world view, muslims [along with others] are my brothers and sisters.
The 'world view' of a devout muslim, is that a person such as myself is a vile animal, and that i should be killed.
Gaybriel,
Read your own words again...
Quote:....something I have noticed is that whenever someone tries to reveal a different point of view, tries to clarify a word's definition or reveals it multiple meanings- there is no tolerance for this at all. this is seen as playing games and avoiding the truth- rather than a reflection of the fact that the truth is often hard to find and involves some level of complexity.
Is the TRUTH really so hard to understand?