Yes, so sorry. Two women, 72 and 39 years old, are sooooo dangerous, their very exsistence is an affront.

But, you know, it was the bad muslims that did it. True islam is peace and this sort of thing is so un-islamic and such an abberration. You never hear anything like this in a month of Sundays.

Actually, it was probably some Mossad or CIA stooges who did it anyway. Thailand is a well-known area of operation for them.

Jews and Americans, eh? How low can they stoop? Killing Buddhists now - ccould not happen under the Caliph. And for what? Oil and to blacken the muslims. That's all it is. Plus they are afraid of all their peeople converting to islam in droves.


(and so on and on and on and on and...)i

and more amd more


"A GIRL believed to be just 13 has detonated an explosives belt and blown herself up at a checkpoint in Iraq - killing four guards and injuring 15 civilians.

Police said the attacker activated her explosives belt at a checkpoint in Baquba, capital of Diyala province.

The checkpoint is manned by former Sunni insurgents, Sawha, who switched sides to battle al-Qaeda.

Fifteen people, including three women, were injured in the attack.

Dr Ahmed Fuad of Baquba General Hospital confirmed the number of killed and wounded and said the bomber appeared to be a 13-year-old girl.

Diyala is one of the most dangerous areas of Iraq. Insurgent groups and al-Qaeda have continued launching attacks there despite a massive military crackdown by US and Iraqi forces.
A number of attacks in Diyala, especially suicide bombings, have been carried out by women.

Since the beginning of the year more than 30 women have committed suicide in Iraq attacks, compared with eight in 2007.

Baquba, 60km north of Baghdad, is regularly hit by bombings as a result of fighting between members of al-Qaeda and the Sahwa.

Sahwa members are mostly former insurgents who fought US and Iraqi forces after dictator Saddam Hussein's fall in 2003, but have helped curb violence since late 2006 when they started helping the Americans to battle al-Qaeda."

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24634110-952,00.html


she was too young even to be a wife, unless to a paedophile

This is why I have such trouble understanding why Abu and Lestat object to my claim that Muslims should reign in Islamic extremists and terrorists. Even if you thought the US was to blame for invading Iraq, it would still be the right thing to do. Simply waiting for a Caliphate to restore order for you is absurd. This is starting to look like Northern Ireland, and at this rate it is going to take just as long for the Shiits and Sunnis to come to their senses. Maybe longer if even Muslims living in peace on the other side of the world object to the notion of Muslims taking responsibility.

this one only advocated murder, does he still get 72 virgins in the brothel in the sky ???




"A FORMER Qantas employee who became the second person convicted under Australia's tough anti-terror laws has been found guilty in absentia of terrorism charges in Lebanon.

At a sentencing hearing in the NSW Supreme Court yesterday, lawyers for Belal Saadallah Khazaal, who has been found guilty of producing a book knowing it could assist in a terrorist act, argued that his convictions in Lebanon should not be taken into account because he was never able to put his side of the case.

Khazaal, 38, of Lakemba in Sydney's southwest, was convicted in absentia in Lebanon for his alleged involvement in funding the 2003 bombing of a McDonald's restaurant in Beirut.

He was sentenced in absentia to 15 years for falsifying a passport for another Australian man who had fled to Lebanon from Australia.

This information was not revealed to the jury in his NSW Supreme Court trial, at which he was convicted in September of producing a book described as a "do-it-yourself terrorism guide" containing an assassination hit-list that included US President George W. Bush.

In the first conviction of its kind in Australia, Khazaal was found guilty of the offence of compiling a book knowing it could assist in a terrorist act.

However, the NSW Supreme Court jury failed to reach a verdict on a second charge against Khazaal of attempting to incite a terrorist act.

On that basis, Khazaal's barrister, George Thomas, argued that any sentence handed down to his client must be at the lower end of the scale.

Khazaal was arrested and charged in June 2004 over the publication on the internet of a 110-page book titled Provision on the Rules of Jihad - short judicial rulings and organisational instructions for fighters and mujahideen against infidels.

He was among the first people charged after the federal Government introduced tough new terrorism laws in late 2003.

Khazaal's conviction followed that in June 2006 of Sydney architect Faheem Khalid Lodhi, who became the first person convicted under the new laws.

The book listed various means of assassination, including letter-bombs, booby-trapping cars, kidnappings, poisonings and shooting down planes.

The book also contained a hit-list of officials and countries to be targeted, including Australia and the US.

In the Supreme Court yesterday, Khazaal's close friend and doctor Tamir Khalil said Khazaal was suffering from medical ailments including a possible neurological condition that might have affected his behaviour at the time of the offence.

Dr Khalil said he had known Khazaal for many years and had never known him to display any violent tendencies, or even to talk about violence. But the doctor said Khazaal's medical history indicated a possibility he might have a tumour on his brain and this should be investigated.

Khazaal's wife, Mervat, gave evidence, telling the court her husband spent a lot of time working with angry Muslim youths, trying to protect them from their own emotions.

"He tried to cool them down," Ms Khazaal told the court.

She described her husband as a lovely man who was honest and generous and respected her.

During the trial, US terrorism expert Evan Kohlmann described the book as a do-it-yourself guide to terrorism aimed at people who did not have Osama bin Laden's telephone number.

Khazaal will be sentenced at a date to be fixed next year."

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24654145-601,00.html

Being angry for God means being angry with that which God disapproves of. Are you not angry with what God disapproves of? Or are you happy and content with it? I'd say the latter judging by your views so far. You're happy with sin and filth and displeased with righteousness and piety.

Besides, in your Bible, when Prophets went to war, they supposedly killed old and young, men, women, maidens, ripped unborn babies from their mothers' wombs, yet you constantly see fit to criticise Islam? Because a man fought for that which displeases God??

I was just thinking about it recently, compared to the descriptions of Prophets (pbut) from the OT (adulterers, incestous, drunken orgies with their daughters, sending neighbours to war because they covet their wifes, building temples to pagan deities, keeping 700 concubines etc etc (which I believe is all slander anyway)) Muhammad (pbuh) is the most moral, upstanding prophet ever to walk the earth.

this is a good one, I'll prob get the boot though


"Ali (ra) was about to kill one of the quraish in battle when the man spat in his face.
So he lowered his sword and let him go since if he continued with killing the man at that point it would have been for the sake of his own anger and not because the man was an open enemy of the Muslims bent on wiping us out."

Imagine the battlefield after the fight .
It'ld be coated in spittle.