Grendel wrote on Oct 19
th, 2008 at 5:58am:
I heard the other day that all the whinging and wining and complaining about the West was just people exercising their democratic rights.
But when is it just dissent or something worse?
Many people dissent from government policy, etc... but in doing so they don't feel hatred or animosity to their fellow countrymen or the country they live in or the civilisation in general that they are a part of.
They don't burn, spit or piss on their country's flag or burn ephigies of politicians here or abroad. They certainly don't celebrate tragedies like 9/11. Or the Bali bombings.
I think the difference between dissent and sedition is when it goes from
1) critiquing society in a constructive way and working within the system to bring about change
to
2) trying to incite others to do acts that are harmful to society and others, or to engender hostility towards particular groups of people/institutions etc with the intention of his hostility manifesting itself in destructive action
that's my very basic understanding anyway.
as abu_rashid said- there are double standards.
one can merely look at alan jones' comments around the cronulla riots to see this.
he said all of his filth on air and then gets the prime minister coming out saying he's an 'outstanding broadcaster'. but if alan jones was a muslim reading stuff out about bashing up 'kuffar' etc- you can bet he wouldn't have john howard defending him, and would have been much more harshly prosecuted (probably under the sedition laws, as opposed to under the broadcasting regulations)