Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Neo-con terrorist cells (Read 3354 times)
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Neo-con terrorist cells
Aug 5th, 2008 at 8:17pm
 
For some balance....

Judeo-Christian Extremist Militants Hiding Nukes in USA

Neocon terrorist cells have been waging a global war of terror and error for the past 6 years; laying waste to entire countries; rolling back civil liberties, ravaging their own economy and instituting fascism in the heart of Empire and “full spectrum dominance” elsewhere; training and deploying brainwashed kids (or just poor kids with no other prospects in life, disproportionately drawn from less privileged backgrounds) and broadcasting their supremacist ideology of corporate greed and unlimited unsustainable consumerist entitlement in banal infotainment broadcast by the compliant, complicit mainstream media.

Ignoring the peaceful central tenets of the very religion they profess to follow (Thou Shall Not Kill! Thou Shalt Not Covet Thy Neighbour’s Land/ Oil/ Resources!) they whip up fear and hatred against mostly Muslim (not that Christians are exempt, especially in the oPt) brothers and sisters and contrive war against innocents.

Once, weapons were manufactured to sell for war. Now, wars are manufactured to sell weapons.

Paul Craig Roberts notes:

Neoconservatives have called for World War IV against Islam. In Commentary magazine Norman Podhoretz called for the cultural genocide of Islamic peoples. The war is already opened on four fronts: Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, and Iran.

The nukes they harbour in secret locations continue to proliferate. The Strategic Security Blog (a project of the Federation of American Scientists) reports that:

North Korea may have gotten all the attention, but all the nuclear weapon states were busy flight-testing ballistic missiles for their nuclear weapons during 2006. According to a preliminary count, eight countries launched more than 28 ballistic missiles of 23 types in 26 different events. … including the [USA's] 117th consecutive successful launch of the Trident II D5 sea-launched ballistic missile.

The busy ballistic missile flight testing represents yet another double standard in international security, and suggests that initiatives are needed to limit not only proliferating countries from developing ballistic missiles but also find ways to curtail the programs of the existing nuclear powers.

Strategic Security have also posted a valuable article on Where the Bombs Are (9 Nov 2006; appended below).

As he announced plans for a peace conference to create an international movement to criminalise war, former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir has recently said war criminals Bush and Blair should be tried.


Ever wondered where all those nukes are stored? A new review published in the November/December issue of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists shows that the United States stores its nearly 10,000 nuclear warheads at 18 locations in 12 states and six European countries.

The highest concentration of nuclear warheads is at the Strategic Weapons Facility Pacific in Bangor, Washington, which is home to more than 2,300 warheads – probably the most nuclear weapons at any one site in the world. At any given moment, nearly half of these warheads are on board ballistic-missile submarines in the Pacific Ocean.

Approximately 1,700 warheads are deployed on Ohio-class ballistic missile submarines operating in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans, and about 400 warheads are at eight bases in six European countries – Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey and Great Britain (for more information on U.S. warheads in Europe, go to http://www.nukestrat.com/us/afn/nato.htm). The United States is the only nuclear weapon state that deploys nuclear weapons in foreign countries.

Consolidation of U.S. nuclear storage sites has slowed considerably over the past decade compared to the period between 1992 and 1997, when the Pentagon withdrew nuclear weapons from 10 states and numerous European bases. Over the past decade, the United States removed nuclear weapons from three states – California, Virginia and South Dakota, and from one European country - Greece.

The overview finds that more than two-thirds of all U.S. nuclear warheads are still stored at bases for operational ballistic missiles and bombers, even through the Cold War ended more than 16 years ago. More than 2,000 of those warheads are on high alert, ready to launch on short notice. Only about 28 percent of U.S. warheads have been moved to separate storage facilities. The largest of these, an underground vault at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico, stores more than 1,900 warheads.

The 10 U.S. sites that currently host nuclear weapons are: the Strategic Weapons Facility Pacific, Bangor, Washington; Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada; Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming; Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico; Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana; Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota; Pantex Plant, Texas; Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana; Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri; and the Strategic Weapons Facility Atlantic, Kings Bay, Georgia. (See map.)


http://peoplesgeography.com/2007/01/10/christian-extremist-militants-hiding-nuke...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: Neo-con terrorist cells
Reply #1 - Aug 5th, 2008 at 8:52pm
 
Quote:
Once, weapons were manufactured to sell for war. Now, wars are manufactured to sell weapons.


Good point. Especially considering the revelations about the 10,000 nuclear warheads and the network of bases needed to house them. It's not good economics to have so much hardware lying around and no good reason to use it for.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: Neo-con terrorist cells
Reply #2 - Aug 6th, 2008 at 5:46pm
 
Quote:
It's not good economics to have so much hardware lying around and no good reason to use it for.


Agreed - and this is where I have some sympathy for Muslims.  Terrorism has to be fought with terrorism (apparently) and in many countries practising jihad - the greater the sophistry of their enemies' weapons, the more duplitious and violent they have to become to protect what they believe belongs to them.

The damage, destruction and toxins the US leaves behind them in each country they occupy, plant their military bases, arsonal and oil wells encourages terrorism.  It's a pity Australia had to be complicit and many of us feel resentment towards the US and the previous government - so it's not too hard to imagine how those in the occupied countries feel.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Neo-con terrorist cells
Reply #3 - Aug 6th, 2008 at 6:05pm
 
You cannot revile neocons, without reviling Islamists as well.
They are opposite sides of the same coin, fundamentalist religious nuts, with megalomanic aspirations.

The main difference is from the support or opposition, that they receive from their respective cultures.

While the vast majority are extremely opposed to the lunatic neocons, unfortunately Islam cannot make similiar claims, and that is a real concern.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 52819
At my desk.
Re: Neo-con terrorist cells
Reply #4 - Aug 6th, 2008 at 6:15pm
 
Does that explain why the neocons were democratically elected to government, while the terrorists are hiding in caves?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: Neo-con terrorist cells
Reply #5 - Aug 6th, 2008 at 6:21pm
 
My sympathy lies only with the victims Mozzaok.  Familes are literally torn apart, sanctions are imposed, basic infrastructure is destroyed, In many parts of Iraq & Afghanistan there is no electricity or fresh water and no decent hospitals, schools or jobs.  What is available to the Muslim youth in these ravaged countries?   What choice do some of them have?  Look at our idle and uneducated young men of no obvious religion.  They're not even in a warzone, yet they emanate hate and violence and we're supposed to be the lucky country.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: Neo-con terrorist cells
Reply #6 - Aug 6th, 2008 at 6:24pm
 
Quote:
Does that explain why the neocons were democratically elected to government, while the terrorists are hiding in caves?


I think it must FD.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mozzaok
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 6741
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Neo-con terrorist cells
Reply #7 - Aug 6th, 2008 at 7:40pm
 
Whoa up FD. Who said the neocons were elected?
Bush and the republicans were elected, but not all republicans are neocons, and vice versa.

There is an interesting movie online, which I can't tell you the name of,sorry, but it follows the parallel rise of the muslim brotherhoods revival, and the emergence of the neocons.
It traces back to WW2 and shows their influences etc.

Some egyptian immigrant got disenchanted with western decadence, and went home to revive fundamental islamic principles, and the US nuts were inspired by some professor who liked gunsmoke, and saw it as the perfect analogy for life,ie; you have to have a baddie, if you want to look like a goodie.
The civil rights movement, the anti-war movement, and the hippie movement convinced them they needed to steer the US away from liberalism.

I will try and find a link, but it was a while ago, so I am not sure how I will go.
Back to top
 

OOPS!!! My Karma, ran over your Dogma!
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print