The source of the story is Panama News. They've quoted the Israeli version from The Los Angeles Times and the Palestinian version from France Press.
Israeli version of the incident:
Quote:...at least three police officers struggled with Salah, held him face down and pulled off his shirt and pants. A bomb squad expert arrived and tried to defuse the explosive, but Salah rolled around trying to press the trigger button on his stomach against the cement, according to police.
Finally, the officers shot Salah in the head. Palestinian activists accused the officers of executing him in cold blood, saying he was under control when he was shot.
Israeli police, however, said the officers fired because they feared he would ignite the explosives. They argued that police hope to capture suspected bombers alive to assist their investigations.
A prosecutor's inquiry found no wrongdoing and the case was closed, according to Gil Kleiman, a national police spokesman."
Palestinian Society for the Protection of Human Rights and the Environment (LAW) of the incident:
Quote:However, accounts by eyewitnesses contradict the version given by the Israeli police. According to France Press, 12 Palestinians witnessed the incident from their homes. They asserted that Mahmoud Salah was handcuffed when he was killed. An eyewitness reported to LAW as follows:
On Friday, 8 March 2002, at 4 p.m., I heard noises outside the building where I live, which is Project 3 of the Nusseibeh Buildings in Beit Hanina. I looked out of the window that overlooks the road in front of the building; the road is only about 8 meters away. I saw how a military jeep stopped the two men.
....
Randy was taken at 4.15 p.m. in a military jeep to an unknown destination. Mahmoud was forced to lie flat on his face and had his hands cuffed behind his back. The special [police] unit tore down Mahmoud's clothes. He was wearing a light navy blue jacket and a yellow shirt and a dark yellow cotton pair of pants.
I didn't see any bags with Mahmoud as Israelis claim. I heard how he was questioned about his name and the place of residence. I understood that he was from Nablus and that his name was Mahmoud. There were three members of the special [police] unit surrounding the guy on the ground; they were dressed in dark gray. One of them placed his foot on the guy's head and another was holding his feet and a third was sitting on his knees pointing a gun at him from a distance of approximately 1.5 -2 meters.
At around 4.30 p.m., the third member shot the guy eight or nine times in the head. Then they left the place and left the guy bleeding. The guy was trying to move and to stand up. At around 5.15 p.m. he stopped moving.
At around 5.20 p.m. Israeli police brought a robot, which drew a black belt. The strange thing is that I did not see that belt when the police tore down the guy's clothes before he was killed.
....
The victim's fingerprints were then taken and photos of the corps were taken. An Israeli ambulance took the victim away from the scene of the incident.
Nb. Palestinian version is edited a little to fit into one post. However, you can read the full version from the link.
Source: http://www.thepanamanews.com/pn/v_08/issue_08/letters_01.html
You fail to disclose Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade confirming that Mahmoud Salah was a suicide bomber.
Here's why it is inconclusive. Can you definitely confirm that he wasn't trying to detonate the bomb while on the ground? You say that "obviously there was no bomb". Can you definitely confirm that? If not, then what was the robot doing?
If I, a neutral without bias (and with empathy for the Palestinians) cannot be convince either way which side is telling the truth then how can you expect people who already have hardened views to believe you. Your conclusion (like Sprint's) is preconcieved from your allegiances. You (like Sprint) only see and believe what you want to see and believe.
You strike me as an intelligent and well researched person (particularly when it come to the Qur'an). Therefore, I am surprised that you fail to disclose such obvioucs details such as that he was a confirmed suicide bomber (and not as innocent has you would have us believe) and missed an apparently damning photo such as the robot? If there are different versions of the incident then lets see the other 4 pictures. Who are you trying to convince?