Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
hybrid vehicles (Read 10912 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53324
At my desk.
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #30 - Jun 24th, 2008 at 11:10am
 
That's equivalent to 75c per litre of petrol.

Where did you get that from? It's a lot higher than I would have expected.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #31 - Jun 24th, 2008 at 1:55pm
 
freediver wrote on Jun 24th, 2008 at 11:10am:
That's equivalent to 75c per litre of petrol.

Where did you get that from? It's a lot higher than I would have expected.


I worked it out in my head. Let's do it carefully this time:

The Energy value of petrol is 34 MJ/L. Multiply by 0.278 and you get 9.4 kWh/L (Units/L). With petrol at $1.60 per litre, that's 17 cents /Unit.

Discounted Electricity is 9c per unit = 9/17 = 53c per litre.

Hmmm,  I might have used a slightly higher energy value on the previous calculation. (Or I might have made a mistake). Is that more like what you expected?

A bit of Googling shows that the AIP figures for energy content are 31.9 MJ/L for petrol and 21.2 MJ/L for ethanol. I guess we should be using those figures.

That gives us 17.9c/ Unit for Petrol  at $1.60 per litre and 18.2c/Unit for E10 at $1.57 per litre (wow!)
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 24th, 2008 at 2:00pm by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53324
At my desk.
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #32 - Jun 24th, 2008 at 2:37pm
 
That sounds more reasonable.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #33 - Jun 24th, 2008 at 3:28pm
 
I forgot to multiply through by the price of petrol:

9/17.9 x 1.60 = 80 cents/litre

That's closer to what I got before. I was right the first time round. I think I used $1.53/L before, which is what I filled up for on the weekend.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53324
At my desk.
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #34 - Jun 24th, 2008 at 3:31pm
 
Let us know when you figure it out. To get a meaningful result you would have to take efficiency (ie the various losses) into account as well. You will probably have to go by measured performance rather than trying to equate energy sources.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #35 - Jun 24th, 2008 at 3:35pm
 
I thought about efficiency, but it all becomes too hard when you consider the use of electricity. The efficiency of appliances varies enormously. Incandescent light globes are about 10% efficient in terms of light output.

Keeping with Units is close enough for me.

This is a good exercise though. I must develop a spreadsheet for it.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Acid Monkey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Goth Father

Posts: 1064
EU
Gender: male
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #36 - Jun 25th, 2008 at 12:55am
 
From today's The Age newspaper

"HYBRID CARS COST $50 MORE TO RUN"

Extract:
Fuel for thought for potential hybrid car buyers is the revelation that the Toyota Prius, which uses an electric motor to help the petrol engine, costs about $50 a week more to run than its closest petrol equivalent, a Toyota Corolla small hatch, and up to $5 a week more than a mid-sized four-cylinder Toyota Camry.

The Honda Civic hybrid costs about $23 a week more to run than its four-cylinder petrol equivalent, the survey shows.

That should change when the hybrid Camry stars rolling off Toyota's local assembly line in two years, Mr Case says.

The Camry hybrid is expected to cost about $4000 more than its petrol equivalent, compared with the Civic and Prius, which cost about $10,000 more than their petrol equivalents and add substantially to ownership costs.




(Source: http://www.theage.com.au/environment/hybrid-cars-cost-50-more-to-run-20080624-2w65.html)



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #37 - Jun 25th, 2008 at 9:45am
 
Acid Monkey wrote on Jun 25th, 2008 at 12:55am:
From today's The Age newspaper

"HYBRID CARS COST $50 MORE TO RUN"


Utter horsefeathers. Don't believe a word of it.  "costs about $50 a week more to run than its closest petrol equivalent, a Toyota Corolla small hatch" ????

Guess what ? The Corolla is a much smaller and less powerful car than the Prius. The cost of servicing a Prius is the lowest of any car I've ever owned. Apart from anything else, the reliability is far superior to anything else I've driven. I've seen the oil that comes out of an oil change for a Prius. It comes out clean, because the engine is built to tighter specifications. The wear is minimal. Even the brake disks never wear out, because most of the braking is inductive. I spoke to a Prius mechanic recently who told me that he had never replaced the brake disks on any Prius yet, and he had never replaced the rechargeable batteries either.  

The fuel consumption of a Prius is around 4.4 L/100km compared to about 7 for a Camry. Also, read what I said earlier about resale value.

What has happened to reporting standards these days? I always take anything I read in the mainstream media with a grain of salt .  
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 25th, 2008 at 9:51am by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Acid Monkey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Goth Father

Posts: 1064
EU
Gender: male
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #38 - Jun 25th, 2008 at 6:09pm
 
muso wrote on Jun 25th, 2008 at 9:45am:
What has happened to reporting standards these days? I always take anything I read in the mainstream media with a grain of salt .  


I'm of the same view.
Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Acid Monkey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Goth Father

Posts: 1064
EU
Gender: male
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #39 - Jun 25th, 2008 at 6:10pm
 
muso wrote on Jun 24th, 2008 at 1:55pm:
The Energy value of petrol is 34 MJ/L. Multiply by 0.278 and you get 9.4 kWh/L (Units/L). With petrol at $1.60 per litre, that's 17 cents /Unit.

....



What does the figure 0.278 represent?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #40 - Jun 25th, 2008 at 6:16pm
 
It's very basic.  You have a car, it needs fuel to run it.   Nobody gives a fig on how much YOU spend a week getting to work.   It will always be cheaper to stay at home and WORK than driving to the Orifice, should you be able to do that.   Or catch a bus or train.  Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53324
At my desk.
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #41 - Jun 25th, 2008 at 6:46pm
 
The best option is to live close to work and ride your bike. That way you get some much needed exercise as well. Assuming you are a desk jockey of course.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
RecFisher
Senior Member
****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 347
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #42 - Jun 25th, 2008 at 9:22pm
 
muso wrote on Jun 25th, 2008 at 9:45am:
Utter horsefeathers. Don't believe a word of it.  "costs about $50 a week more to run than its closest petrol equivalent, a Toyota Corolla small hatch" ????


Maybe they are including depreciation and other "whole of life" costs in their calculation.  There's a lot more to the cost of running a car than the fuel it uses.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #43 - Jun 26th, 2008 at 12:06pm
 
Acid Monkey wrote on Jun 25th, 2008 at 6:10pm:
muso wrote on Jun 24th, 2008 at 1:55pm:
The Energy value of petrol is 34 MJ/L. Multiply by 0.278 and you get 9.4 kWh/L (Units/L). With petrol at $1.60 per litre, that's 17 cents /Unit.

....



What does the figure 0.278 represent?


Energy unit conversion from MJ to kWh.

http://www.onlineconversion.com/energy.htm
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: hybrid vehicles
Reply #44 - Jun 26th, 2008 at 12:07pm
 
RecFisher wrote on Jun 25th, 2008 at 9:22pm:
muso wrote on Jun 25th, 2008 at 9:45am:
Utter horsefeathers. Don't believe a word of it.  "costs about $50 a week more to run than its closest petrol equivalent, a Toyota Corolla small hatch" ????


Maybe they are including depreciation and other "whole of life" costs in their calculation.  There's a lot more to the cost of running a car than the fuel it uses.


Maybe they are buying it on the highest available interest rate and trashing it after 1 year without any insurance. Read my previous posts on resale value.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print