Australian Politics Forum - suspending members

boxingkangaroo

Full Member

Offline

Posts: 129

suspending members
Feb 29^th, 2008 at 10:15am

mantra wrote on Feb 29^th, 2008 at 8:44am:

Cracticus - just ignore some of the comments made by IQ, if they're particularly annoying. IQ always has to have the last word, even after having lost an argument.

IQ woke up this morning too.."did i ever tell you whakco that you were a dud r......? He answers " you are!"

This is the reality in IQs world. Roll Eyes

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 6^th, 2008 at 10:04am by ozadmin »

IP Logged

IQSRLOW Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 1618	Re: Saying sorry Reply #1 - Feb 29^th, 2008 at 10:23am BK- you are a f@cking moron IQ woke up this morning too.."did i ever tell you whakco that you were a dud r......? He answers " you are!"
Back to top	« Last Edit: Feb 29^th, 2008 at 10:28am by IQSRLOW » Political Animal has little moderation. It is the forum for free speech and free thinkers to converse passionately without the threat of being banned. It is a forum for adults. IP Logged

athiest Ex Member	Re: Saying sorry Reply #2 - Feb 29^th, 2008 at 10:30am Queen Elizabeth 3 (4.1%)Our Prime minister 31 (42.4%)The British Prime Minister 3 (4.1%)Nobody-Forgive and Forget 36 (49.3%) Interesting figures, I wonder how many of you would agree with the japanese apoligising to Australian POWs? I mean WW2 was 60 + years ago, so why should they?
Back to top	IP Logged

IQSRLOW

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 1618

Re: Saying sorry
Reply #3 - Feb 29^th, 2008 at 10:38am

Nobody-Forgive and Forget 36 (49.3%)

Yep

Interesting figures, I wonder how many of you would agree with the japanese apoligising to Australian POWs? I mean WW2 was 60 + years ago, so why should they?

I don't think they should although equating the govt sanctioned removal of aboriginals from destructive environments to POW's is stretching things just a little don't you think?

Back to top

Political Animal has little moderation. It is the forum for free speech and free thinkers to converse passionately without the threat of being banned. It is a forum for adults.

IP Logged

athiest

Ex Member

Re: Saying sorry
Reply #4 - Feb 29^th, 2008 at 10:45am

IQSRLOW wrote on Feb 29^th, 2008 at 10:38am:

Nobody-Forgive and Forget 36 (49.3%)

Yep

Interesting figures, I wonder how many of you would agree with the japanese apoligising to Australian POWs? I mean WW2 was 60 + years ago, so why should they?

I don't think they should although equating the govt sanctioned removal of aboriginals from destructive environments to POW's is stretching things just a little don't you think?

No, the RSL are always belting on about it , in case you forgot the war was government sanctioned as well.

Back to top

IP Logged

IQSRLOW Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 1618	Re: Saying sorry Reply #5 - Feb 29^th, 2008 at 2:33pm The Japanese obviously aren't as hung up about past issues as the regressive looking ruddites are. But good luck with that- I'm sure kruddy will get to it right after he is finished trying to please the ignorant masses by vigorously shaking his finger at the Japanese over whaling
Back to top	Political Animal has little moderation. It is the forum for free speech and free thinkers to converse passionately without the threat of being banned. It is a forum for adults. IP Logged

Cracticus

New Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 35

Re: Saying sorry
Reply #6 - Feb 29^th, 2008 at 9:15pm

mantra wrote on Feb 29^th, 2008 at 8:44am:

Cracticus - just ignore some of the comments made by IQ, if they're particularly annoying. IQ always has to have the last word, even after having lost an argument.

Yes, I can see that. Well, none of it is to be taken too seriously. It's all just repartee. Some might think I'm encouraging IQ to make himself look foolish for my own amusement; but then again I might be encouraging him to reconsider some of the things he says and maybe learn from his mistakes.

You will always get people trolling by means of their own studied silliness. How about the one who reckons he knows more about hating all the people in the world because I'm a racist? The lack of logic in that beggars belief, and it's not even funny. IQ at least tries to be funny.

Back to top

IP Logged

Cracticus

New Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 35

Re: Saying sorry
Reply #7 - Feb 29^th, 2008 at 9:17pm

IQ, since you seem to want to promote understanding of English, consider the following.

Your words "Being a lefty, I would assume such-and-such"

Mean:

"I am a lefty, therefore I assume such-and-such"

It is a simple matter of English grammar and syntax. Suggestion — print this and take it to school with you on Monday; get your teacher to explain it to you.

Back to top

IP Logged

IQSRLOW

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 1618

Re: Saying sorry
Reply #8 - Feb 29^th, 2008 at 9:38pm

Perhaps you should go back to school and ask the teacher to explain context to you but first wash the sand out of your mangina otherwise you will find it hard to concentrate with all that chafing

The thought of a leftard such as ignorant as yourself teaching anyone anything is a joke in itself. The first thought that would come to mind with anyone reading any of your diatribe is 'ignorant blowhard'

The pathetic message that you may be trying to unsuccessfully convey is libel to be lost among the plethora of left wing ignorant blowhards that inhabit political forums.

...and you are a racist

Back to top

Political Animal has little moderation. It is the forum for free speech and free thinkers to converse passionately without the threat of being banned. It is a forum for adults.

IP Logged

deepthought Gold Member Offline In Defence Of Liberty Posts: 2869	Re: Saying sorry Reply #9 - Feb 29^th, 2008 at 9:42pm I'd like to say sorry for new members who pop up every now and again with the express purpose of flaming long standing members who actually contribute stuff. Father forgive them, for they know not what they do. I know what they do though and that is be sock puppets.
Back to top	IP Logged

IQSRLOW Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 1618	Re: Saying sorry Reply #10 - Feb 29^th, 2008 at 9:49pm Thanks DT, but I have been flamed better by others who are a couple of rungs above the evolutionary scale than Stickler here. Anyone is welcome to put there 0.02c worth in- but somehow I feel I owe him a refund
Back to top	Political Animal has little moderation. It is the forum for free speech and free thinkers to converse passionately without the threat of being banned. It is a forum for adults. IP Logged

Cracticus

New Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 35

Re: Saying sorry
Reply #11 - Feb 29^th, 2008 at 9:51pm

Acid Monkey wrote on Feb 29^th, 2008 at 10:06am:

merou wrote on Feb 28^th, 2008 at 7:19pm:

Cracticus wrote on Feb 28^th, 2008 at 6:41pm:

Ever heard of the Racial Discrimination Act, 1975? Or the Racial Hatred Act, 1995?

So if it's not hatred of a race, or discrimination against a certain race but pointing out the fact that a certain race has, as a majority, alcoholics, drug addicts, large majority in prison, violent etc etc in it's population, could you then just call it the truth? or do you still think that pointing out these facts is racist?

Sometimes the truth about a certain race is just fact, expressing these facts does not mean you are racist.

Sometimes truth or contructive criticism can be falsely labelled as villification.

For example, people offering facts or constructive criticism against Israel are sometimes brushed aside or labelled as "anti-Semitic". This ploy whether intentionally (or otherwise) is employed primarily to stifle debate or to discredit the commentator.

Truth is truth and facts are facts. However, generalisation and wholesale villification is discrimination

To say that there is a problem with alcoholism in the outback communities primarily among the aborigines is fact. To say that all aborigines are petrol sniffing alcoholics is villification.

"We apologise for giving you law and order which has helped
prevent you from slaughtering one another and using the
unfortunate for food purposes."

"We apologise for developing large farms and properties, which
today feed you people, where before, you had the benefits of
living off the land and starving during droughts."

Do you consider stuff like this and all the other putrid garbage accompanying it "truth" and "constructive criticism", then? I have already asked others to point out the alleged truth or facts in the aforesaid garbage. And another to point out the "information" he says it contains. So far nothing has been forthcoming. Only irrelevant rants from the keyboard mashers. Since you seem to want to defend it, perhaps you will oblige?

And please stop putting too many Ls in words.

Back to top

IP Logged

Cracticus

New Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 35

Re: Saying sorry
Reply #12 - Feb 29^th, 2008 at 9:59pm

IQSRLOW wrote on Feb 29^th, 2008 at 9:38pm:

Perhaps you should go back to school and ask the teacher to explain context to you but first wash the sand out of your mangina otherwise you will find it hard to concentrate with all that chafing

The thought of a leftard such as ignorant as yourself teaching anyone anything is a joke in itself. The first thought that would come to mind with anyone reading any of your diatribe is 'ignorant blowhard'

The pathetic message that you may be trying to unsuccessfully convey is libel to be lost among the plethora of left wing ignorant blowhards that inhabit political forums.

...and you are a racist

Sorry about the school quip. I can see you have a PhD in making a fool of yourself.

Back to top

IP Logged

IQSRLOW Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 1618	Re: Saying sorry Reply #13 - Feb 29^th, 2008 at 10:00pm And please stop putting too many Ls in words. Just had to add that you're an ignorant leftard spelling nazi as well- oh the shame
Back to top	Political Animal has little moderation. It is the forum for free speech and free thinkers to converse passionately without the threat of being banned. It is a forum for adults. IP Logged

IQSRLOW

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 1618

Re: Saying sorry
Reply #14 - Feb 29^th, 2008 at 10:05pm

Do you consider stuff like this and all the other putrid garbage accompanying it "truth"

If its lies and innuendo that you want to censor, then that would be slippery path to tread from your side of the fence...Mantra would have been banned from the internet along time ago. Or perhaps it's only propaganda from the socialists side that passes your lofty test Adolf?

Back to top

Political Animal has little moderation. It is the forum for free speech and free thinkers to converse passionately without the threat of being banned. It is a forum for adults.

IP Logged