Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Firebreaks pretty useless: green groups (Read 1606 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47366
At my desk.
Firebreaks pretty useless: green groups
Oct 22nd, 2007 at 8:37pm
 
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Firebreaks-pretty-useless-green-groups/2007/10/22/1192940974872.html

Environmental campaigners are calling for more independent scientific research to determine the best solutions for protecting Victoria's forests from bushfires.

In the aftermath of last summer's devastating bushfires that destroyed almost 1.2 million hectares across Victoria - the state government authorised a 600km network of fire breaks to protect water catchment areas and create better access for firefighters.

But the Wilderness Society is calling for a "dramatic rethinking" of current fire management policies, saying the fire breaks - including some up to one kilometre wide - amount to the "indiscriminate" and unnecessary destruction of pristine wilderness areas.

"We would prefer to see more expenditure and investment in infrastructure - for example, bring in more water-bombing helicopters - and a quicker response to fire outbreaks.

"Fire breaks and fuel reduction measures around populated areas is great for protecting people and properties and local communities but large-scale fire reduction measures in remote areas is very unnecessary and quite indiscriminate."

The disastrous fire season prompted the state government to launch a parliamentary inquiry to examine the impact of public land management practices on the frequency and intensity of bushfires.

The inquiry's brief also included examining the effectiveness of prescribed burns and permanent fire breaks, the provision of large water access points on crown land and the impact of climate change and land use on bushfires.

Mr McFadzean said bulldozing huge tracts of land to create fire breaks in remote areas also served to further the interest of the commercial logging industry.

"You cannot treat Victoria's forests as a single, homogenous landscape - different approaches are needed for different areas.

"We'd also like to see an end to logging, which destroys wetter old growth forests and replaces it with young, dry and more fire-prone regrowth over vast areas."
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
IQSRLOW
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 1618
Re: Firebreaks pretty useless: green groups
Reply #1 - Oct 22nd, 2007 at 9:30pm
 
I'm all for the govt spending more on scientific research...as long as they pull it from the Wanderlust Societies budget allocation.

This is just another ploy from extremists to isolate humans from the environment
Back to top
 

Political Animal has little moderation. It is the forum for free speech and free thinkers to converse passionately without the threat of being banned. It is a forum for adults.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print