Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
justice denied on DNA aquittals (Read 1733 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51693
At my desk.
justice denied on DNA aquittals
Aug 18th, 2007 at 2:23pm
 
Only the worst get chance at DNA acquittal

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22264641-2702,00.html

AUSTRALIA'S only DNA evidence review body has begun taking applications from convicts seeking to prove their innocence, but only the worst of the worst can apply.

The NSW DNA Review Panel, launched quietly in June, has received at least three applications from notorious criminals. Two applicants, whose identities have not been divulged, have had their forms sent back because of insufficient information.

While DNA technology has existed for 20 years and has helped convict thousands of criminals, Australia has been reluctant to use it to free the innocent. The 2001 quashing of Queensland man Frank Button's conviction for rape remains the only acquittal based on fresh DNA evidence.

While the new review panel may begin to redress the balance, its critics say it will be limited by its narrow guidelines. Only prisoners serving sentences of more than 20 years can apply, a rule described as irrational by the NSW Bar Association. Mr Button would have been ineligible because he was serving just seven years.

Those who have completed their sentence will also not be able to apply.

The NSW Bar Association said the DNA Review Panel's powers were insufficient.

"It's a toothless tiger," association president Michael Slattery QC said. "It doesn't have inherent powers to investigate whether biological materials exist. It doesn't have real teeth to find biological material and make sure it's preserved, which should be an important part of its function."

An inquiry into the previous Innocence Panel found that police continued to destroy evidence despite a commissioner's instruction that biological material be kept. Of the 13 prisoners who tried to have DNA exhibits tested via that panel, DNA exhibits were found for only one prisoner -- Jamieson.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
merou
Full Member
***
Offline


Less Tolerance, More Shooting

Posts: 193
Pilbara WA
Gender: male
Re: justice denied on DNA aquittals
Reply #1 - Aug 19th, 2007 at 8:29am
 
Well, sometimes it's more important to get a conviction than it is to find the perpetrator, Scapegoats are a bad cops best friend, on the books.
Back to top
 

Shoot the scum and let God sort em out.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print