Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
'practical' steps towards monoculturalism? (Read 14909 times)
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #30 - Oct 5th, 2008 at 11:23am
 
Quote:
And if we DO have religious freedom... why are prayers banned in public schools and politics?


Last time I listened to the parliament on newsradio they opened with the Lord's prayer (ie. the standard Christian prayer), and funnily enough, every other day I listened to it, they did the same...
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53211
At my desk.
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #31 - Oct 5th, 2008 at 1:52pm
 
Multiculturalism corrodes it because it relativises cultural practices and makes them out to be of equal value, especially in the sense that one cultural impulse (say, the maintenence of group solidarity) is as valid as another (say, freedom of conscience).  

Do you see that freedom as being somehow less valid than solidarity? Do you see them as mutually exclusive?

Do you have an answer to the original question? It's all well and good to bitch about what you think is wrong with our society, or blame it's faults on the latest buzzword, but unless you can come up with a cure that isn't worse than the disease, what's the point?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #32 - Oct 5th, 2008 at 3:08pm
 
soren,
Quote:
Civilisation (there is only one)


That's a little absolutist isn't it?

At any given time in the world, there's perhaps only one dominant civilisation, but to suggest all other civilisations are not civilisations is a little self-centred don't you think?
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #33 - Oct 5th, 2008 at 4:49pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Oct 5th, 2008 at 3:08pm:
soren,
Quote:
Civilisation (there is only one)


That's a little absolutist isn't it?

At any given time in the world, there's perhaps only one dominant civilisation, but to suggest all other civilisations are not civilisations is a little self-centred don't you think?


No. There are many cultures. There is only one civilisation.


Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 5th, 2008 at 5:00pm by Soren »  
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #34 - Oct 5th, 2008 at 4:59pm
 
freediver wrote on Oct 5th, 2008 at 1:52pm:
Multiculturalism corrodes it because it relativises cultural practices and makes them out to be of equal value, especially in the sense that one cultural impulse (say, the maintenence of group solidarity) is as valid as another (say, freedom of conscience).  

Do you see that freedom as being somehow less valid than solidarity? Do you see them as mutually exclusive?

Do you have an answer to the original question? It's all well and good to bitch about what you think is wrong with our society, or blame it's faults on the latest buzzword, but unless you can come up with a cure that isn't worse than the disease, what's the point?


I believe i said that multiculturalism relativises values and THEREBY presents them as equal. I DO NOT believe that values are equal. I do not believe that the values I gave as examples are equal.

I responed to the original question by pointing out that it is framed wrongly. Monoculture is not the response to multuculturalism, civilisation is - which is also the right response to monoculture.
I am trying to draw attention to the difference between culture (the local practices, customs, habits, etc) and civilisation.






Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 5th, 2008 at 5:23pm by Soren »  
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53211
At my desk.
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #35 - Oct 5th, 2008 at 9:37pm
 
Are civilisation and multi/monoculturalism mutually exclusive?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #36 - Oct 6th, 2008 at 7:21am
 
Another stupid bloody title fd?

How do we get rid of Multiculturalism.

Replace it with its former policies either assimilation or Integration

Stop the wasted spending on it and sell off SBS.


It'll save us billions, better spent on real things and real social harmony for a change.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #37 - Oct 6th, 2008 at 9:27am
 
freediver wrote on Oct 5th, 2008 at 9:37pm:
Are civilisation and multi/monoculturalism mutually exclusive?

No.
But they err on the two ends of the same spectrum - multiculturalism talks up the 'Other' too much, as if every cultural practice deserved  the same respect and room at the table  while monoculture, if practiced as an ideology, talks up the 'ein volk', ein reich'.

Civilisation, while grammatically a noun, signifies a quality. Or if the word is used to denote a thing, it is the stuff that makes a culture more or less civilised.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2008 at 9:33am by Soren »  
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53211
At my desk.
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #38 - Oct 6th, 2008 at 9:39am
 
multiculturalism talks up the 'Other' too much, as if every cultural practice deserved  the same respect and room at the table

Not exactly every one. Only those that fall within the law. At least, that's how it works in the west. Within that, most cultural practices are baggage that are fairly neutral in terms of 'civilisation'. Perhaps the law is equivalent to what you see as civilisation. Or maybe you should give an example of a cultural practice that is better than others.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #39 - Oct 6th, 2008 at 10:59am
 
freediver wrote on Oct 6th, 2008 at 9:39am:
[i] [quote]Or maybe you should give an example of a cultural practice that is better than others.


Buying your meat at the butcher's rather than slaughtering it in your bathtub.
Not having a bone in your nose is better than having one.
Loving life is better than loving death.
Providing for sustained free inquiry is better than not allowing it.
Freedom of religion is better than religious persecution.
Personal responsibility is better than collective responsibility.
Having aa father and a mother is better that having two of the same.
Being literate iss better than being illiterate.
Studying literature and history is better that not having either.
Making music is better than forbidding music.
Personal hygiene is better than lack of it.
Tolerance is better than intolerance.
Confidence in what is best in one's own culture is better than lack of confidence.
Recognitioin of human dignity is better than slavery.








Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53211
At my desk.
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #40 - Oct 6th, 2008 at 11:27am
 
Most of those are not 'practices'. The ones that are, are pretty trivial. The rest are values that tend to transcend culture.

If someone wants to stick a bone in their nose, why shouldn't they? Does it actually harm society?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Acid Monkey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Goth Father

Posts: 1064
EU
Gender: male
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #41 - Oct 6th, 2008 at 12:44pm
 
freediver wrote on Oct 6th, 2008 at 11:27am:
If someone wants to stick a bone in their nose, why shouldn't they? Does it actually harm society?


Seriously, I think you'll find that some people do stick bones and other pieces of metals in their nose as well as other body parts like ears, nipple, tongue, lip, peenis, rosebuds etc

Grin Grin Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #42 - Oct 6th, 2008 at 1:11pm
 
freediver wrote on Oct 6th, 2008 at 11:27am:
Most of those are not 'practices'. The ones that are, are pretty trivial. The rest are values that tend to transcend culture.

If someone wants to stick a bone in their nose, why shouldn't they? Does it actually harm society?



You asked about "cultural practice that is better than others".

Not every practice that is worse is to be prohibited. Sticking bones iin your face is primitive, sticking itemss of ironmogery in your face iss primitive and stupid. Corse, stupid and primitive and other inferior practices harm society by making it also corser, stupider, more primitive. But of course it is not possible to prohibit stupidity. Luckily for the rest of us, it is mostly its own punishment.

One significant drawback of being excessively deferntial to the cultural 'other' is that by now many people are unable to bring themselves to identifying primitive, backward or corse and stupid cultural practices out of multicultural piety.
As with almost every cultural aspect of our lives, we happen to speak in terms of categories when in fact things are, like colours, on a scale.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53211
At my desk.
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #43 - Oct 6th, 2008 at 1:28pm
 
Corse, stupid and primitive and other inferior practices harm society by making it also corser, stupider, more primitive.

They are decorations, nothing more. They don't make society stupider. This is like arguing that the Mona Lisa makes rich people stupid by bringing cave drawings into their living room.

One significant drawback of being excessively deferntial to the cultural 'other' is that by now many people are unable to bring themselves to identifying primitive, backward or corse and stupid cultural practices out of multicultural piety.

Either that, or it never was as clear cut as they assumed and they are now more enlightened.

I'm having trouble why you lump together such important values as personal freedom, life, education, tolerance, dignity etc with such trivial crap. It's almost like you want to raise your own set of personal cultural baggage to the same level of importance.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 8312
Gender: male
Re: 'practical' steps towards monoculturalism?
Reply #44 - Oct 6th, 2008 at 7:03pm
 
"Buying your meat at the butcher's rather than slaughtering it in your bathtub."

Fair few small Australian farmers do home kill and butchery for themselves and friends. Nothing wrong with saving some money and hassle.

As for "practical steps towards monoculturalism" canceling dual citizenship would help.
Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print